On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Kim Bruning <k...@bruning.xs4all.nl> wrote: > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:23:28AM +0200, Andre Engels wrote: >> Being educational should be just another word for being in scope, and >> in scope are, in my opinion, in the first place those files that are >> usable for the projects. That is the first thing that we should be >> judging things by. > > I've already emphasized that a bit already on the page, but more from > the WARNING angle.
That only says that pictures that are _used_ should not be deleted indiscriminately. Used and usable are not the same. > Could you edit or comment on the page in a way that reflects what you > just stated? :-) Hardly. The page as it is now seems to go from the point of view that we should not host any pornography, then restricts itself by trying to get a narrow definition of 'pornography'. For me, whether or not something is pornographic is at best a secondary issue. -- André Engels, andreeng...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
