On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 20:34, Fred Bauder wrote:
> Leaked cables are primary sources, some of which pose problems because
> they may contain non-public personal identifying information. Generally
> the information in them becomes available for our purposes after they
> have been analyzed by a peer
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 09:36:10PM +0300, Dan Rosenthal wrote:
> > Leaked cables are primary sources, some of which pose problems because
> > they may contain non-public personal identifying information. Generally
> > the information in them becomes available for our purposes after they
> > have be
>
>
> >
> > We consider WL to be a reliable source?
> >
> >> [1] http://wikileaks.org/cable/2006/01/06BELGRADE41.html
> >
> > (goes off to read)
>
> Leaked cables are primary sources, some of which pose problems because
> they may contain non-public personal identifying information. Generally
> the
Yeah whatever was the final ruling on that, as to whether wikileaks cables
can be cited?
Dan Rosenthal
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Kim Bruning wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 08:32:59AM +0200, Milos Rancic wrote:
> > So, to understand the circumstances around building community or
> > chap
> On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 08:32:59AM +0200, Milos Rancic wrote:
>> So, to understand the circumstances around building community or
>> chapter in particular country, I strongly suggest reading relevant
>> cables.
>
> <3
> Lots of work.
>
>>
>> And, BTW, Wikipedia articles could be improved thanks t
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 08:32:59AM +0200, Milos Rancic wrote:
> So, to understand the circumstances around building community or
> chapter in particular country, I strongly suggest reading relevant
> cables.
<3
Lots of work.
>
> And, BTW, Wikipedia articles could be improved thanks to those cabl
Contrary to the widespread meme that Americans are ignorant, [some of
the] US diplomatic cables are precious material for studying cultural
diversity.
Building global movement requires reading documents about societies,
like this one [1] is. Analysis is fully accurate, although 7 years old
and som
