> > > > > > We consider WL to be a reliable source? > > > >> [1] http://wikileaks.org/cable/2006/01/06BELGRADE41.html > > > > (goes off to read) > > Leaked cables are primary sources, some of which pose problems because > they may contain non-public personal identifying information. Generally > the information in them becomes available for our purposes after they > have been analyzed by a peer-reviewed secondary source. > > Fred > > > Nevermind, thanks Fred.
-Dan _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
