> On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 08:32:59AM +0200, Milos Rancic wrote: >> So, to understand the circumstances around building community or >> chapter in particular country, I strongly suggest reading relevant >> cables. > > <3 > Lots of work. > >> >> And, BTW, Wikipedia articles could be improved thanks to those cables. > > We consider WL to be a reliable source? > >> [1] http://wikileaks.org/cable/2006/01/06BELGRADE41.html > > (goes off to read)
Leaked cables are primary sources, some of which pose problems because they may contain non-public personal identifying information. Generally the information in them becomes available for our purposes after they have been analyzed by a peer-reviewed secondary source. Fred _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
