I think I would consider it educational. Travel itself is an
educational experience, and a fuller travel experience enabled by the
sharing of Wikimedia-style free knowledge all the more so :)
Thanks,
Richard
(User:Pharos)
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Patricio Molina
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 9,
Indeed, I would expect for the 'Sister Projects Committee' to have
both the options of project fission and project fusion within its
toolbag.
Thanks,
Richard
(User:Pharos)
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Tarc Meridian wrote:
>
> In some respects, that change would be quite good. My experience o
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Gregory Varnum wrote:
> Some modifications and requested info has been added to:
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Ask.wikimedia.org_(Q%26A_site)
>
> -greg aka varnent
There have also been a couple of other proposals on meta along these
same lines, and perhaps som
> new projects any more. It would be great to see one new project every year
> :)
I had suggested earlier that we might even run this as an annual
thing, with a Wikimania-style bidding process for the new sister
projects.
Thanks,
Richard
(User:Pharos)
> No dia 4 de Abril de 2012 05:53,
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Samuel Klein wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:38 AM, David Gerard wrote:
>> On 3 April 2012 07:47, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
>>
>>> We had started a stub table about this:
>>> https://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_things_that_need_to_be_free
>>
>> This is
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
> Samuel Klein, 03/04/2012 06:40:
>
>> - a global list of areas needing free knowledge, and how far we are
>> as a society towards reaching that goal
>
>
> We had started a stub table about this:
> https://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Lis
Hi folks,
I've started this page to help list the various themed multi-event
campaigns that have been popping up around the Wikimedia universe:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiWorldDays
Not sure if it's the best name, I was also thinking WikiSpring, or
WikiSeason, or WikiWhatnot.
(ye
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Erik Moeller wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Samuel Klein wrote:
>> That sounds reasonable. Most things discussed on this list are not
>> specially relevant to the Foundation.
>
> OK. Any strong objections to changing the list name and scope (the
> latte
Side question:
Does Chinese Wikipedia indeed have an elected or consensus "leader" or
some sort?
Thanks,
Richard
(User:Pharos)
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Yao Ziyuan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I think you guys can all see how useful it would be if the Chinese
> Wikipedia also has the ebook/PDF c
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Przykuta wrote:
>> >
>> I agree cities are probably better, but I don't think that's really the
>> best place to start editing Wikipedia either, because it's an area where
>> it's really easy for new users to mistakenly think that they should
>> write content based
I would pitch it as a simple appeal to edit the Wikipedia article on
your hometown (or home neighborhood if you're from a big city).
In my experience, something like this has been attractive to a very
broad spectrum of people, and gives them a nice "in" as a place to get
started.
Thanks,
Richard
Earlier this year, I helped organize and archive some of the past proposals
for new Wikimedia projects on meta, and those with an education focus
(including several for children's education) are collected here:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Proposed_projects_-_education
Perhaps these hi
I thought folks might be interested in this, which was created by
Moving Brands as a hypothetical project for rebnranding Wikimedia, and
published in Viewpoint Magazine in the UK:
http://www.movingbrands.com/?category_name=wikipedia-work
Note the very elaborate work on this, and the particular ro
I'd like to approach the "Unnamed Movement" idea from a slightly
different perspective.
What we really have emergent is a series of related movements, many of
which are nested inside of each other.
At the highest and most general level is the Free Culture Movement,
which is a real and active move
Informally, and in my own mind, I tend to think of like-minded free
culture wiki sites as part of a broader "Wiki Knowledge" movement.
Of course, this is not meant to be an exclusivist or trademarked term :P
Thanks,
Richard
(User:Pharos)
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Samuel Klein wrote:
> I
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 1:02 AM, John Vandenberg wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Pharos wrote:
>> ..
>>
>>
>> I agree, a focus on new namespaces (perhaps with differentiated
>> editing permissions, per Liam) certainly looks like the best path
>> fo
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Milos Rancic wrote:
> On 07/01/2011 11:52 PM, WereSpielChequers wrote:
>> One thing I find irritating and complex about our structure is the
>> proliferation of small wikis. Now I've no objection to the idea that
>> we have a wiki for every language on Earth, though
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:32 PM, MZMcBride wrote:
> James Forrester wrote:
>> On 2 June 2011 03:25, MZMcBride wrote:
>>> Samuel Klein wrote:
I'd like to see this for more than just the Foundation - any event
where wikimedians have a presence - but this is a great place to
start.
>>>
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Samuel Klein wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 8:37 AM, David Gerard wrote:
>> On 10 April 2011 13:14, David Moran wrote:
>>
>> For that matter, the contents of
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Wikipedia_ads might be nice for
>> the site notice.
>
> Yes, w
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Nikola Smolenski wrote:
> Дана Sunday 10 April 2011 06:36:22 MZMcBride написа:
>> featured article requirements or anything like that. They might be
>> inundated with too many links in welcome messages (which I view as a
>> largely separate issue from policy creep)
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Ray Saintonge wrote:
> Translation is an important problem, and it is also key to making
> material available in less developed languages. Linked with moral rights
> it gives too much leeway to those who would claim that a given
> translation is defamatory.
>
> It m
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> On 28 January 2011 20:33, phoebe ayers wrote:
>> Such a solution would make it easier to fold separate wikis
>> (such as a conference wiki) back into Meta when we were done with
>> them, too.
>
> Why fold them into meta afterwards rather tha
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Aaron Adrignola
wrote:
>>
>> I agree that the edit restrictions on the WMF wiki are very
>> unfortunate and there's still much more that can be done (perhaps one
>> day leading toward www.wikimedia.org as a single information,
>> collaboration and discussion hub, s
There's a high correlation between broadband and income levels that
probably has more to do with it.
Thanks,
Pharos
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Fred Bauder wrote:
> "Broadband use remains another predictor, as 59% of those with home
> broadband use the service, compared w
I actually tried to set up a geonotice to catch Wikipedian
Antarcticans a while back, but unfortunately the convergence of the
longitude lines kind of threw it off :P
Thanks,
Pharos
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Ray Saintonge wrote:
> On 01/05/11 4:52 PM, David Gerard wrote:
>> On
It would also be great if we could have banners inviting people to
participate in major local community events, like the many Wikipedia
10 celebrations planned for January.
http://ten.wikipedia.org
Thanks,
Pharos
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Daniel ~ Leinad wrote:
> One of Polish bann
tral ground: not
> necessarily tied to the values of our Foundation or anyone else's.
>
> What do you think? Does such a thing exist already? Would it work?
>
> -- Phoebe
Ourproject.org does something like this, but I thin
Perhaps an alternative strategy could be to hold a grand round-robin
vote to launch one new project per year, at least in beta phase.
This might ensure that the very best ideas get through and are
actualized, without quite opening the floodgates.
Thanks,
Pharos
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 11:47 AM
LocalWiki looks like a great project.
In a similar vein, Wikimedia NYC has been engaged with local free
culture and community groups on our joint 'NYCwiki' initiative:
http://nycwiki.org/wiki/Main_Page
http://nycwiki.org/wiki/NYCwiki:Community_portal
Thanks,
Richard
(User:Pharos)
Wikimedia NYC
h
Our 2nd annual Wiki-Conference NYC will be held over the weekend of
August 28-29 2010, hosted by ITP at NYU's Tisch School of the Arts,
and also supported by Free Culture @ NYU and Wikimedia New York City.
Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Sue Gardner will be giving a
keynote, and we will al
This is a pretty great embodiment of our copyleftism, that's for sure.
BTW, here's the guy's website:
http://humaneinfo.com/
Thanks,
Pharos
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 6:07 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> http://www.tomsguide.com/us/humane-reader-wikipedia-console,news-7706.html
>
so on. Well, it's a minor issue from out point of view, I
> guess. How would Mediawiki scale to 130 million articles? Gotta cover
> everything...
The number of notable subjects covered in all those books is much much
greater than >> 130 million.
Thanks,
Pharos
> ___
I presume the interview with Jimbo was in English? This would
probably be a good opportunity for collaboration with English
Wikinews...
Thanks,
Pharos
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Cristian Consonni
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm the coordinator of w...@home in Wikimedia Italia.
>
This is just wonderful.
Bravo, Italian Wikinews!
Thanks,
Pharos
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
> Ilario Valdelli, 04/08/2010 10:37:
>> A translation can be found here:
>> http://it.wikinews.org/wiki/Intervista_a_Umberto_Eco/Traduzione
>
> Yes,
l the projects in each language, for children"
That's an interesting conception, right there.
Thanks,
Pharos
> ___
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Uns
What about wikipediajr.org ?
And so we would have en.wikipediajr.org, fr.wikipediajr.org etc.
Thanks,
Pharos
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Ziko van Dijk wrote:
> Thanks for your very useful thoughts, Samuel. They lead us to these
> two key questions:
>
> - Create new Wikipedi
This is the best source of the "zeroth law" of Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Raul654/Raul%27s_laws#Laws_by_others
I believe people have tried to track down the original coiner, but
noone really knows.
Thanks,
Pharos
2010/6/17 Jon Harald Søby :
> Yes, it's commu
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Philippe Beaudette
wrote:
> tbh, I'm very fond of "Double check". It seems to imply exactly what
> we want: the edit isn't being accepted automatically, nor rejected,
> but simply getting a second look. It's fairly neutral in tone, and
> understandable to the ave
en, worthy bids that do not win Wikimania could still be funded and
supported by the Wikimedia Foundation as regional conferences.
Thanks,
Pharos
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> Wikimania 2011 has come, yet again another location in the middle-east.
>
> It see
ewiki is part of the "wiki knowledge movement" :)
Thanks,
Pharos
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
I believe this is the page that Phoebe is looking for:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Batch_uploading
Thanks,
Pharos
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Michael Peel wrote:
> Also see the 'content partnerships' page on the Wikimedia UK wiki
> that I've p
t; Serbian language - two different scripts are used and what it evoked.
> We are in a similar situation.
>
> At this moment Classical Chinese sources are hosted on zhwikisource
> whose default is simplified Chinese. Formerly some of them were in
> traditional and then we at Japanese wikis
for changing the abbreviation?
>>
>>
> You are right. I just noticed this name a couple of days ago and i also
> think that it's unfortunate.
>
> Be bold: raise this issue at
> http://wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Scriptorium and open the bug at
> bugzilla wi
The proposal in this instance seems to be for merging all of the
Wikinews language editions into one mega-project, which seems to me an
exceedingly radical and perhaps counterproductive step.
Thanks,
Pharos
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Milos Rancic wrote:
> I am cleaning Requests for
tional value in its own right, and even if someone were to donate
a textbook in a rather obscure language I don't think that we should
turn such a gift away.
Thanks,
Pharos
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Milos Rancic wrote:
> I am cleaning Requests for new languages [1] at Meta. Som
OmegaWiki was originally intended to be a multilingual Wiktionary project...
http://www.omegawiki.org
Has there been any thought on bringing it back somehow into the Wikimedia fold?
Thanks,
Pharos
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Milos Rancic wrote:
> I am cleaning Requests for new langua
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Bod Notbod wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Pharos wrote:
>
>>>> I was just wondering, how would you like to start an almanac, guys? That
>>>> would be neat, a wiki
>
>> Our friends at the allied project Ope
recent feature from the BBC about 'The volunteer
mappers who helped Haiti':
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/8517057.stm
Thanks,
Pharos
> --
> Casey Brown
> Cbrown1023
>
> ___
> foundation-l mailing list
> foun
e to spend that money
directly on special efforts to increase high-quality free content
about environmental topics on Wikipedia and the other projects.
Thanks,
Pharos
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Aryeh Gregor
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Tim Starling wrote:
>> It'
estly with just a handful of GLAMs, run
through a chapters "vouching" system, and move on from there.
If Wikimedia Australia were able to take the initiative on this and
start a pilot project, I personally think that would be fantastic.
Thanks,
Pharos
>
> wittylama.com/blog
> Pe
s.
Thanks,
Pharos
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:38 AM, Gerard Meijssen
wrote:
> Hoi,
> When they are blocked like it happened with the Tropenmuseum, I will ask the
> person who did this to reconsider... There has to be a reason for a block
> and these organisations do what they do and they do it
the Wikiversity and Wikijunior projects, both started as
"virtual wikis" on Wikibooks. Wikiversity eventually took its own
path, while Wikijunior after some discussion was still felt to be best
as part of the mother wiki.
I feel that this Wikiversity/Wikijunior model could prove valuable
s.
Thanks,
Pharos
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Laura Hale wrote:
> Erik suggested I post this to the list for further discussion.
>
> Sincerely,
> Laura Hale
>
>
>
>
>
> *Introduction*
> Fan History Wiki is a project dedicated to documenting the history o
FYI my comment was on the whole thread, not about any particular response.
Hence the "[general comment]" disclaimer.
Thanks,
Pharos
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Chad wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:56 AM, Ray Saintonge wrote:
>> Pharos wrote:
>>> I can th
I can think of approximately 500,000 other issues that it would
perhaps be more productive for us to argue about on this list.
[general comment]
Thanks,
Pharos
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Ray Saintonge wrote:
> Thomas Dalton wrote:
>> 2009/11/1 Anthony:
>>
>>> Here
ncludes a small subset of pre-approved articles.
Thanks,
Pharos
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Sean Moss-Pultz
> Date: Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:51 AM
> Subject: [openmoko-announce] WikiReader
> To: annou..
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Michael Snow wrote:
> John Vandenberg wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Brian wrote:
>>
>>> I propose expanding the notion of the Wikimedia Incubator to include
>>> entirely new projects that are very, very easy to create. They don't need to
>>> be approve
images into videos (with fading in/out) is fairly
> standard in video editing software. It's something that could be done
> by the community a) if they want, and b) if they have the software.
>
> Mike
In an ideal world, it might be nice to have a video of the speaker and
a slidesho
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> 2009/9/10 Sue Gardner :
>> Hi Thomas!
>>
>> Sorry to top-post, and to be late replying. I believe that all 26
>> proposals are up now on the meta page. Let me know if you can't find
>> it, and I can post the link tonight when I'm back on my l
uld also like to note, this image is a shiny example of the new
> annotations feature!
I agree, the scroll-over annotation and translation looks brilliant to my taste.
Thanks,
Pharos
> Cary
>
>
> ___
> foundation-l mailing list
> fou
Indonesians speak English
than Dutch, and if translation to English is relatively easy, this
will probably facilitate translation to Indonesian also.
Thanks,
Pharos
> 2009/7/15 John at Darkstar
>
>> At least the term base should be translated.
>> John
>>
>> Gerard M
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Sue Gardner wrote:
> Sure. Actually the New York chapter probably sends some press releases to US
> media too; I'm not sure.
FYI We have had a number of contacts with journalists, but so far we
have not been in the habit of putting out formal press releases. This
ove video playability without encouraging people to upload
> at low qualities which are completely unsuitable for editing.
I presume there's no way to thumbnail them in a way analogous to how
images are thumbnailed?
Thanks,
Pharos
> ___
> founda
ee it
working with supra-local efforts like "Wikimedia Working Group for
Catalan".
Of course, the "Working Group Organizer" can and should delegate
activities to other trusted persons, but the overall responsibility
(and the blame if things somehow go horribly wrong) is theirs.
Thanks
es for Commons? I'd personally like to deprecate the GFDL,
> but if it's a Commons-accepted free content licence then there's no
> reason not to accept it.
Of course, there are and always have been a wide range of free content
licenses used for images
Hi folks,
The 1st Wiki-Conference New York will be held over the weekend of July
25-26 2009 (confirmed!) at New York University, and hosted by Free
Culture @ NYU and Wikimedia New York City.
Jimmy Wales will be giving a keynote, and we'll also have several
dedicated panel discussions to be organi
al does not make much
sense to me.
Thanks,
Pharos
> Ziko van Dijk
>
> read more in German on
> http://groups.google.de/group/infobrief-wiki-welt/msg/21c9f6c00634d13c?
>
>
>
> --
> Ziko van Dijk
> NL-Silvolde
> ___
> found
useums participate.
>
> -- Hay
Hooray for Patricio and Wikimedia AR!
Looks like everything went brilliantly, and that you had a very
productive 'invasion'. Like Hay, I am very happy to see this
cross-fertilization of ideas, and I very much look forward to future
updates from everyone.
se cheap pendants colorful, make them collectible, let people
string dozens on a necklace, and soon you'd have thousands of copies
of books floating through society that can never be lost.
Wow, I can't believe they let us post this stuff on foundation-l :)
Thanks,
Pharos
>
>
s too. Devs like Aude can be be a real
asset in jumpstarting chapters activities as well, as she has shown
with her great organizing work in Washington DC.
Thanks,
Pharos
> It was all really great :-)
> Sue
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Dalton
>
> Date:
would be added -in addition- to the
encyclopedically-oriented Category:Museo_de_La_Plata. Possibly in the
future, with a growing archive of items in the museum's collection,
you will even find the need for more specific topical categories, like
Category:Dinosaurs_at_Museo_de_La_Plata.
Thanks,
P
pure review process by academic
experts would be of great value, and help to indirectly guide the
contributors to such articles along more productive paths.
Thanks,
Pharos
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:50 AM, Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote:
>> But I do not believe that experts should have any specia
ntributing
to.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:External_peer_review
Thanks,
Pharos
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote:
>
>> One of your points there was:
>>> 6. The current experience (or at least my current experience) is not
>>> really
ted, I believe the other language most suited to
such a project would be French, because of its lingua franca status in
large parts of the developing world.
Thanks,
Pharos
> 2009/2/25 Cary Bass
>
>> Ray Saintonge wrote:
>> > Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
>> >> However
dozen museums and cultural institutions
around the globe who will be participating next month.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Loves_Art
Thanks,
Pharos
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
n.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Takes_Manhattan
http://www.streetfilms.org/archives/wikis-take-manhattan/
If anyone anywhere is interested in helping their local museum to
participate in this project, please contact me and I'll help.
Thanks,
Pharos
___
a personal appeal, rather than an impersonal donation
> message, the letter seems more likely to resonate with people.
This is really important. Even the fact there was a picture is
helpful. It humanizes the process, and makes it much less anonymous.
When this letter has reached its audience
Maybe we the technical side of WMF could get a "communications
advisor", some trusted volunteer from among the regular Wikimedians,
like they've done at the Chapters Committee recently.
Thanks,
Pharoos
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:13 PM, Eugene Zelenko
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> There are
n, but hopefully adequate:
> http://toolserver.org/~nikola/mis.php
>
> Examples:
>
> http://toolserver.org/~nikola/mis.php?uselang=nl&search=paard
> http://toolserver.org/~nikola/mis.php?uselang=el&search=%CE%AF%CF%80%CF%80%CE%BF%CF%82
Something like this looks pretty goo
"14 articles on famous cows"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Famous_cattle
That's still gotta be way more than Britannica.
Thanks,
Pharos
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Chad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Pharos <[EMAIL PR
"2,434 articles on people born in 1908"
Ha!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:1908_births
Thanks,
Richard
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Rand Montoya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey All-
>
> If you have the time and energy, take a look at this site notice here:
> http://dev.donate.wikime
"260 languages"
This page says they are technically 264 Wikipedias:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Languages
But Herero and Tokipona have 0 articles, and Simple English, useful as
it may be, isn't really a separate language.
So, I say we go with 260.
Thanks,
Pharos
On Fri, De
l be the case that many students "quit" Wikipedia for the
summer, and only take it up again after winter break, when they are
more settled into their academic routine than in the fall.
Thanks,
Pharos
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Pharos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>&
s whats
> happened, any theories as to why?
>
> Nathan
Summer break for students would be the obvious reason.
Or just good weather, generally.
You might find the inverse if you look only at Southern Hemisphere IPs.
Thanks,
Pharos
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 5:32 AM, Robert R
I think it's good that this started after the election.
We would lose if we competed with Obama donations...
As it is, I think some of the donors may be looking for new places to give.
Thanks,
Pharos
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Chad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov
If the 'mo' language code is deprecated, then why not ro-cyrl.wikipedia.org ?
Thanks,
Pharos
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Brion Vibber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For quick background, it's pretty painful to rename a database in our
> system, and we currentl
hould also be a
great aid in improving literacy in English and other spoken languages.
Several SignWriting studies have focused on its use as an educational
tool that increases student's real literacy in spoken languages.
Thanks,
Pharos
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Gregory Maxwell <[EM
87 matches
Mail list logo
