On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 28 January 2011 20:33, phoebe ayers <phoebe.w...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Such a solution would make it easier to fold separate wikis >> (such as a conference wiki) back into Meta when we were done with >> them, too. > > Why fold them into meta afterwards rather than just use Meta from the > beginning? Isn't the whole point of the proposal that we stop creating > new wikis for everything?
Yes, we should start with integrating the most amenable material (ie the most stable/languishing material on side wikis) onto meta as a first step in the project. Changing the url from meta.wikimedia.org to plain vanilla wikimedia.org would be one of the last steps, actually. This should certainly be a multi-stage process, not something that's done all in one blow, but it would definitely be good to start a project for adapting new namespaces on meta soon. Thanks, Richard (User:Pharos) _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
