Reminder that this is happening at 23:00 in #wikimedia-office.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Steven Walling
Date: Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:58 AM
Subject: IRC office hours with the WMF features team, Jan. 4th 2012
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
Hey everyone,
Since folks h
On 4 January 2012 16:24, Oliver Keyes wrote:
> Check the IP history; Jan-Bart added them ;p
Now I'm on an actual computer and not trying to go through page
histories on my phone, I've taken a closer look. The bit about being
truthful was in the initial version. The other bit is the result of
edit
http://gigaom.com/2012/01/04/how-spains-version-of-sopa-is-setting-the-web-on-fire/
2012/1/4 Federico Leva (Nemo)
> emijrp, 04/01/2012 18:59:
> > With this law, a special team in the Ministry of Culture of Spain can
> block
> > any (for-profit or non-profit) website, from Spain or overseas, that
A bit of context for those who haven't been following those pages -- a
draft of those principles (going hand in hand with funds dissemination
principles) was proposed by the WMF board and submitted for community
review and input. After a few months of this, the board is now voting
to approve a fina
emijrp, 04/01/2012 18:59:
> With this law, a special team in the Ministry of Culture of Spain can block
> any (for-profit or non-profit) website, from Spain or overseas, that
> _links_ to copyrighted works. Including Google, Wikipedia or whatever.
> Without a judge.
That's entirely different!
> F
With this law, a special team in the Ministry of Culture of Spain can block
any (for-profit or non-profit) website, from Spain or overseas, that
_links_ to copyrighted works. Including Google, Wikipedia or whatever.
Without a judge.
For further details, search for an analysis.
2012/1/4 Lodewijk
Check the IP history; Jan-Bart added them ;p
On 4 January 2012 16:21, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> Check the page history - I don't think those bits were added by the
> foundation.
> On Jan 4, 2012 3:26 PM, "WereSpielChequers"
> wrote:
>
> > Re Tom's suggestion that we have an RFC on meta to discuss
Check the page history - I don't think those bits were added by the
foundation.
On Jan 4, 2012 3:26 PM, "WereSpielChequers"
wrote:
> Re Tom's suggestion that we have an RFC on meta to discuss what we are and
> aren't prepared to do when fundraising; We already have a discussion at
> Meta
>
> http
We should be careful to start calling all copyright related laws evil (at
least you seem to suggest that) because then that would devaluate very
quickly. At least what I see quickly (but IANALawyer and IANASpaniard) this
law is not thát evil: the government can ask to close a website that is
actual
Re Tom's suggestion that we have an RFC on meta to discuss what we are and
aren't prepared to do when fundraising; We already have a discussion at
Meta
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Draft_Guiding_principles_with_regards_to_fundraising.
Funny thing is that debate has almost been the mirror of here
10 matches
Mail list logo