On 24 October 2011 17:48, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> Nobody disputes the facts regarding the image of
> Mickey Mouse, but we don't know the relevant law.
We do know the relevant law its just unclear what it actually means.
The interplay with commons policy is also an issue. For example it is
possible
On 24 October 2011 12:56, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> We wouldn't need a lawyer to look at every case - ones where the
> author has released it under a free license should be fine, for
> example.
Not remotely. Even at the most basic you would have the whole Freedom
of panorama issue and is the author
Hi all,
Since it hasn't really been mentioned, I just wanted to point out that this
image, never before available to the public in high resolution, was uploaded
to Commons as a result of our ongoing cooperative efforts with the US
National Archives (i.e., my residency). Its copyright status was li
2011/10/24 Carl Fürstenberg :
> It's a difference deciding if uploads of babes with big boobs are
> stolen from the Internet at large or not, than to figure out if a line
> drawing from World War II is free or not.
Indeed. In legal terminology, the difference is between a matter of
fact and a matt
Welcome, Fabrice and Oliver. :)
Maggie
On Oct 24, 2011 1:31 AM, "James Forrester" wrote:
> On 24 October 2011 08:40, Howie Fung wrote:
> > Everyone,
> >
> > I am pleased to announce that we have two contractors joining the
> Technology
> > team. Fabrice Florin will be joining us for the next s
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:25, Orionist wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure a consenus of
>> wikimedians is the best way to make legal decisions anyway, shouldn't we
>> consult an expert?
>
>
> In a perfect world we'd have a legal department that vets each and every
> image uploaded to Commons. The thing is
On 24 October 2011 09:25, Orionist wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure a consenus of
>> wikimedians is the best way to make legal decisions anyway, shouldn't we
>> consult an expert?
>
>
> In a perfect world we'd have a legal department that vets each and every
> image uploaded to Commons. The thing is, we'
And another one, sorry, I cannot find the mail in which it was proposed. But
generally I think a hide/show-all solution would be acceptable to everybode.
There is still a lot of bad blood going around. And it would certainly be
easier to implement it referring to technical reasons of low bandwith,
> With that in mind, I would humbly propose that we kill with fire at
> this point the idea of a category-based image filtering system.
>
> +1
d/sp
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/ma
Hi Eric,
thanks for your answers. For me they were really helpful, and I hope they
can lead to some understanding-
Some of these ideas are explored here:
>
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image_filter_referendum/Next_steps/en#Potential_models_for_hiding_images
>
> Is there a similar brainstormin
On 24 October 2011 08:40, Howie Fung wrote:
> Everyone,
>
> I am pleased to announce that we have two contractors joining the Technology
> team. Fabrice Florin will be joining us for the next six months as Product
> Consultant, leading the development of the next version of the Article
> Feedback
>
> I'm not sure a consenus of
> wikimedians is the best way to make legal decisions anyway, shouldn't we
> consult an expert?
In a perfect world we'd have a legal department that vets each and every
image uploaded to Commons. The thing is, we'd need at least 200 lawyers from
all around the world
Hi,
thanks for the extra info. It would be great if a more extensive timeline
could be entered into the actual information page. Dates I would be looking
for:
* When should translations be finished for the first batch
* When are relevant deadlines?
* When is the fundraiser scheduled to start full
Everyone,
I am pleased to announce that we have two contractors joining the Technology
team. Fabrice Florin will be joining us for the next six months as Product
Consultant, leading the development of the next version of the Article
Feedback Tool. Oliver Keyes (User: Ironholds on enwp) will be j
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Fundraising_2011#When_does_the_fundraiser_start.3F
Best,
Till
Am 19.10.2011 20:01, schrieb Chris Keating:
>>
>> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fundraising_2011 and don't forget to check
>> the discussion page for more places to discuss the fundraiser. As for a
15 matches
Mail list logo
