On 24 October 2011 17:48, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Nobody disputes the facts regarding the image of > Mickey Mouse, but we don't know the relevant law.
We do know the relevant law its just unclear what it actually means. The interplay with commons policy is also an issue. For example it is possible to argue that the image is effectively PD-ND which would be difficult for commons to deal with. -- geni _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
