On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Carol Frampton wrote:
> ...In our fork of the batik library, one of the files has an Apache 1.1
> license which is being flagged by
> RAT. Do I just upgrade that to an Apache 2 license...
According to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-57, yes.
-Bertra
On 11/19/12 12:53 PM, "Carol Frampton" wrote:
>
>
> On 11/19/12 3 :27PM, "Greg Reddin" wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Carol Frampton
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In our fork of the batik library, one of the files has an Apache 1.1
>>> license which is being flagged by RAT. Do I just u
On 11/19/12 3 :27PM, "Greg Reddin" wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Carol Frampton
>wrote:
>
>> In our fork of the batik library, one of the files has an Apache 1.1
>> license which is being flagged by RAT. Do I just upgrade that to an
>>Apache
>> 2 license or do I leave the license a
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Carol Frampton wrote:
> In our fork of the batik library, one of the files has an Apache 1.1
> license which is being flagged by RAT. Do I just upgrade that to an Apache
> 2 license or do I leave the license as-is and exclude it from RAT?
I don't know the answe
