On 11/19/12 12:53 PM, "Carol Frampton" <cfram...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/19/12 3 :27PM, "Greg Reddin" <gred...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Carol Frampton <cfram...@adobe.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In our fork of the batik library, one of the files has an Apache 1.1
>>> license which is being flagged by RAT. Do I just upgrade that to an
>>> Apache
>>> 2 license or do I leave the license as-is and exclude it from RAT?
>>
>>
>> I don't know the answer to that. I'm hoping Dave or Bertrand knows.
>>
Carol, we might need to get on batik's mailing list and see if anyone else
knows why that file as a 1.1 license. It could be third-party and the
copyright doesn't let Apache change the license. Or maybe you can figure
that out from their SVN history?
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
