On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Carol Frampton <cfram...@adobe.com> wrote:
> In our fork of the batik library, one of the files has an Apache 1.1 > license which is being flagged by RAT. Do I just upgrade that to an Apache > 2 license or do I leave the license as-is and exclude it from RAT? I don't know the answer to that. I'm hoping Dave or Bertrand knows. However, it does raise another question. I'd assume the more recent versions of Batik are licensed ALv2. Could we: 1) Upgrade our fork to be based on a more recent Batik version... or 2) Preferably, work with the Batik community to get our customizations integrated in some way? I know #2 has been discussed before and I think it was deemed unlikely or even undesirable. But are our customizations too extreme to perform a #1? Short of all that, I'm hoping we can just upgrade the license of our fork. It seems to me that should work. Greg
