Jeffry I used the patch of Christophe to build up on 1.7
The SDK by default is suitable to JRE 1.5.4+ or better 1.6.1 without any
patch.
Regards
Igor Costa
www.igorcosta.com
www.igorcosta.org
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Carol Frampton wrote:
>
>
> On 7/14/
On 7/14/12 1 :00PM, "Jeffry Houser" wrote:
>On 7/14/2012 12:32 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
>> Jeffry,
>>
>> Where are you seeing that it simply says 1.5.0_13 or higher is
>> required? The README clearly says 1.5 or 1.6. We will want to make
>> sure that gets corrected for others.
>
> The
On Jul 14, 2012, at 8:55 AM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
> On 7/14/2012 11:41 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>> Anyway this is an example about why it is best to try to contribute upstream
>> and use the unaltered project code if possible.
> I have to admit I am not sure if this sentence is directed at me, at
>> The paragraph is attempting to say "any version of 1.5 greater than 0_13 or
>> 1.6". 1.7 is not supported.
>
> Understood [now]. Should we make that more overt and explicitly state
> that 1.7 is not supported? Or am I the only one who is going to make
> that mistake?
Feel free to chang
You are not the only one so far. There have been a few people on the
mailing list that have mentioned they had 1.7.
-Nick
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
> On 7/14/2012 11:57 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 7/14/12 8:55 AM, "Jeffry Houser" wrote:
>>
>> The project sh
On 7/14/2012 11:57 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
On 7/14/12 8:55 AM, "Jeffry Houser" wrote:
The project should note somewhere on the DL page that there are build issues
with Java 7 and what those are, but it is not a release blocker - IMO.
I might recommend adding this to the readme file. I'm s
On 7/14/2012 12:32 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
Jeffry,
Where are you seeing that it simply says 1.5.0_13 or higher is
required? The README clearly says 1.5 or 1.6. We will want to make
sure that gets corrected for others.
The only place I see version numbers mentioned in the readme is
]
Sent: 14 July 2012 17:32
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org; jef...@dot-com-it.com
Subject: Re: Package com.sun.image.* not Found when building Flex Source RC3
Jeffry,
Where are you seeing that it simply says 1.5.0_13 or higher is required?
The README clearly says 1.5 or 1.6. We will want to
Jeffry,
Where are you seeing that it simply says 1.5.0_13 or higher is required?
The README clearly says 1.5 or 1.6. We will want to make sure that gets
corrected for others.
Cygwin is a toolset that allows you to use certain unix/linux tools, such
as bash, on Windows. It does come with a pack
On 7/14/12 8:55 AM, "Jeffry Houser" wrote:
>
>> The project should note somewhere on the DL page that there are build issues
>> with Java 7 and what those are, but it is not a release blocker - IMO.
> I might recommend adding this to the readme file. I'm still under the
> belief that my in
On 7/14/2012 11:41 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Anyway this is an example about why it is best to try to contribute upstream
and use the unaltered project code if possible.
I have to admit I am not sure if this sentence is directed at me, at
Flex, or at Batik.
The project should note somewhere on
There is a patch in Jira that I submitted to build the SDK with Java 7. If
you have some spare minutes, it would be good to know if the patch works
for you.
Regards,
Christophe
Op 14 jul. 2012 17:42 schreef "Dave Fisher" het
volgende:
>
> On Jul 14, 2012, at 8:29 AM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
>
> > O
On Jul 14, 2012, at 8:29 AM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
> On 7/14/2012 11:28 AM, Clint Modien wrote:
>> need to build with jdk ver 1.6
>
> I'll try that; but if that is the case I misunderstood the release notes:
>
>Java SDK 1.5 (0_13 or greater)
>or Java SDK 1.6 (*1)
>
> I assumed that 1.7
On 7/14/2012 11:28 AM, Clint Modien wrote:
need to build with jdk ver 1.6
I'll try that; but if that is the case I misunderstood the release notes:
Java SDK 1.5 (0_13 or greater)
or Java SDK 1.6 (*1)
I assumed that 1.7 was greater than 1.5 and therefore it should work.
Was that an
need to build with jdk ver 1.6
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 14, 2012, at 7:59 AM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
>
> I'm still unable to build the Apache Flex SDK; and I'm guessing it is a
> configuration issue on my own machine; but I'm at a loss on what to look at
> next.
>
> I downloaded the RC3. (
I'm still unable to build the Apache Flex SDK; and I'm guessing it is
a configuration issue on my own machine; but I'm at a loss on what to
look at next.
I downloaded the RC3. ( The zip file from here:
http://people.apache.org/~cframpton/ApacheFlexRC/release_candidate_3/ ).
I'm using W
16 matches
Mail list logo
