Jeffry I used the patch of Christophe to build up on 1.7
The SDK by default is suitable to JRE 1.5.4+ or better 1.6.1 without any patch. Regards ---------------------------- Igor Costa www.igorcosta.com www.igorcosta.org On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Carol Frampton <cfram...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 7/14/12 1 :00PM, "Jeffry Houser" <jef...@dot-com-it.com> wrote: > > >On 7/14/2012 12:32 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote: > >> Jeffry, > >> > >> Where are you seeing that it simply says 1.5.0_13 or higher is > >> required? The README clearly says 1.5 or 1.6. We will want to make > >> sure that gets corrected for others. > > > > The only place I see version numbers mentioned in the readme is in the > >environment variables grid under Install Prerequisites. > > > > To quote: > > > > Java SDK 1.5 (0_13 or greater) > > or Java SDK 1.6 (*1) > > I think this is old wording which I unfortunately didn't improve - maybe > because I parsed it differently or maybe because I've looked at this stuff > so many times I don't even see it. Because it just mentioned the revision > number I think that was meant to imply the revision could be >= 13. If I > originally wrote this I would have written 1.5.13 or greater if I meant > any later version and I would not have included "or Java SDK 1.6". > > Trying to use Java 1.7 is very common mistake. And yes, we need to get > rid of our forks of batik and velocity if at all possible. There is also > an xerces patch as well but it hasn't been as problematic. > > Carol > > > > > > I think I asked this before, but it is wrong for me to assume that > >Java SDK 1.7.something is not greater than Java SDK 1.5.something ? > > > >-- > >Jeffry Houser > >Technical Entrepreneur > >203-379-0773 > >-- > >http://www.flextras.com?c=104 > >UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready! > >-- > >http://www.theflexshow.com > >http://www.jeffryhouser.com > >http://www.asktheflexpert.com > >-- > >Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust > > > >
