You are not the only one so far. There have been a few people on the mailing list that have mentioned they had 1.7.
-Nick On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Jeffry Houser <jef...@dot-com-it.com>wrote: > On 7/14/2012 11:57 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > >> >> >> On 7/14/12 8:55 AM, "Jeffry Houser" <jef...@dot-com-it.com> wrote: >> >> The project should note somewhere on the DL page that there are build >>>> issues >>>> with Java 7 and what those are, but it is not a release blocker - IMO. >>>> >>> I might recommend adding this to the readme file. I'm still under the >>> belief that my interpretation that 1.7 meets the "1.5.0_13 or higher" >>> requirement is not an unusual interpretation. >>> >>> The paragraph is attempting to say "any version of 1.5 greater than >> 0_13 or >> 1.6". 1.7 is not supported. >> > > Understood [now]. Should we make that more overt and explicitly state > that 1.7 is not supported? Or am I the only one who is going to make that > mistake? > > > > -- > Jeffry Houser > Technical Entrepreneur > 203-379-0773 > -- > http://www.flextras.com?c=104 > UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready! > -- > http://www.theflexshow.com > http://www.jeffryhouser.com > http://www.asktheflexpert.com > -- > Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust > >
