-Original Message-
> From: Roland Zwaga [mailto:rol...@stackandheap.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 1:05 PM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Falcon and MXML 2006
>
> On 17 September 2012 20:25, Gordon Smith wrote:
>
> > Does anybody still ca
alcon and MXML 2006
On 17 September 2012 20:25, Gordon Smith wrote:
> Does anybody still care about the 2006 dialect of MXML or has
> everybody moved to 2009? Does Falcon need to support MXML 2006?
Doesn't Flex 3.6 work depend on MXML 2006? Since this will be donated as wel
dipisa [mailto:fili...@dipisa.net]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 12:57 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Falcon and MXML 2006
Does falcon work with the full set of MXML 2009?
On 17 September 2012 20:53, João Fernandes <
joaopedromartinsfernan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Gord
On 17 September 2012 20:25, Gordon Smith wrote:
> Does anybody still care about the 2006 dialect of MXML or has everybody
> moved to 2009? Does Falcon need to support MXML 2006?
Doesn't Flex 3.6 work depend on MXML 2006? Since this will be donated as
well, and a lot of enterprise apps are, appa
Does falcon work with the full set of MXML 2009?
On 17 September 2012 20:53, João Fernandes <
joaopedromartinsfernan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Gordon,
>
> I know a few that are still using the '2006' dialect but in my opinion I
> would make it a low priority to handle it.
>
Gordon,
I know a few that are still using the '2006' dialect but in my opinion I
would make it a low priority to handle it.
Does anybody still care about the 2006 dialect of MXML or has everybody moved
to 2009? Does Falcon need to support MXML 2006?
- Gordon
