No. I'd estimate that we have about 85% of MXML 2009 functionality. I'll assume that the priority is on MXML 2009 and I won't work on MXML 2006 until MXML 2009 is in decent shape.
Falcon has an architecture to support various dialects of MXML, including a few changes for an experimental future MXML 201X dialect. I have an MXML spec, which I'll try to get cleared by Adobe Legal for donation to Apache, that talks about the more extensive changes I recommend to iron out various inconsistencies that I discovered. - Gordon -----Original Message----- From: filippo dipisa [mailto:fili...@dipisa.net] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 12:57 PM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Falcon and MXML 2006 Does falcon work with the full set of MXML 2009? On 17 September 2012 20:53, João Fernandes < joaopedromartinsfernan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Gordon, > > I know a few that are still using the '2006' dialect but in my opinion > I would make it a low priority to handle it. >
