On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Carol Frampton wrote:
> ...In our fork of the batik library, one of the files has an Apache 1.1
> license which is being flagged by
> RAT. Do I just upgrade that to an Apache 2 license...
According to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-57, yes.
-Bertra
On 11/19/12 12:53 PM, "Carol Frampton" wrote:
>
>
> On 11/19/12 3 :27PM, "Greg Reddin" wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Carol Frampton
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In our fork of the batik library, one of the files has an Apache 1.1
>>> license which is being flagged by RAT. Do I just u
On 11/19/12 3 :27PM, "Greg Reddin" wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Carol Frampton
>wrote:
>
>> In our fork of the batik library, one of the files has an Apache 1.1
>> license which is being flagged by RAT. Do I just upgrade that to an
>>Apache
>> 2 license or do I leave the license a
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Carol Frampton wrote:
> In our fork of the batik library, one of the files has an Apache 1.1
> license which is being flagged by RAT. Do I just upgrade that to an Apache
> 2 license or do I leave the license as-is and exclude it from RAT?
I don't know the answe
I'm in the process of fixing some of the "code rot" in the kitting process.
Presumably we will want to release another kit shortly.
In our fork of the batik library, one of the files has an Apache 1.1 license
which is being flagged by RAT. Do I just upgrade that to an Apache 2 license
or do I
