Re: svn commit: r1428687 - /incubator/flex/utilities/trunk/installer/RELEASE_GUIDE

2013-01-04 Thread Om
Yup, that fixed it. Thanks! On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > That's a line ending issue. Run dos2unix on it. > > > On 1/4/13 2:24 PM, "Om" wrote: > > > BTW, this script does not work for me on windows (cygwin) This is what I &

Re: svn commit: r1428687 - /incubator/flex/utilities/trunk/installer/RELEASE_GUIDE

2013-01-04 Thread Om
pected token `$'do\r'' '/sign_and_hash.sh: line 50: `for file in *; do On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Om wrote: > So, should I just make a copy under utilities/trunk/installer? > > > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > >> I'd leave it where it is

Re: svn commit: r1428687 - /incubator/flex/utilities/trunk/installer/RELEASE_GUIDE

2013-01-04 Thread Om
So, should I just make a copy under utilities/trunk/installer? On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > I'd leave it where it is each imo you should be able to build each project > from its own trunk and not have to check out multiple trunks >

Re: svn commit: r1428687 - /incubator/flex/utilities/trunk/installer/RELEASE_GUIDE

2013-01-04 Thread Om
I meant to say: */utilities/trunk/build* On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Om wrote: > Thanks! I was looking for this a while ago but forgot about it. Do you > mind if I moved it into utilities/build directory? That seems like a more > appropriate location for this script . > >

Re: svn commit: r1428687 - /incubator/flex/utilities/trunk/installer/RELEASE_GUIDE

2013-01-04 Thread Om
Thanks! I was looking for this a while ago but forgot about it. Do you mind if I moved it into utilities/build directory? That seems like a more appropriate location for this script . Om On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Carol Frampton wrote: > Justin, > > This seems rather complica

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC2

2013-01-04 Thread Om
Nick, If you are planning to work on more locale strings, I strongly suggest that you check out this AIR app that Roland created. You can find it attached to the JIRA issue here [1] It will make your life much easier. Please feel free to provide feedback on the app as well. Thanks, Om [1

[DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 - RC2

2013-01-03 Thread Om
-installer-config-2.0.xml, modify the download urls to point to the required versions. Then run the app from command line mode with the optional command line parameter: -config= Thanks, Om & Justin

Re: Installer Button Truncation

2013-01-03 Thread Om
do "ant release". Once you let me know, I will put all the artifacts together and start a new [DISCUSS] thread. Thanks, Om

Re: Installer Button Truncation

2013-01-03 Thread Om
Looks very nice! Thanks for this fix. Justin, are you ready to cut an RC2? Om On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > OK, it's in. Rev 1428672. > > > On 1/3/13 3:36 PM, "Om" wrote: > > > Yes please :-) > > > > Om > >

Re: Installer Button Truncation

2013-01-03 Thread Om
Yes please :-) Om On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Hey Om, > > After looking at Nick¹s greek translations, I got motivated enough to code > up a way to get the buttons to grow in a nice way (at least to my eyes). I > just finished it and can check it in. Do

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 RC1

2013-01-03 Thread Om
Nick, Can you please create a .patch file so I can apply it directly via svn? You an create a JIRA task and attach it there. Thanks for our work on this. Regards, Om On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 2:11 AM, Nick Tsitlakidis wrote: > Om, > > Here are the changes I think the installer need

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 RC1

2013-01-03 Thread Om
Fixed RELEASE_NOTES and the issue that Carol raised with losing selections while changing languages. Thanks, Om On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Nick Tsitlakidis wrote: > Having a quick look it seems there are places where translation doesn't > exist. For example the next button keep

[LAZY] Planning to commit Installer Locale Editor to SVN

2013-01-02 Thread Om
check it out of svn and use it. Thanks, Om On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Roland Zwaga (JIRA) wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-0?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13540885#comment-13540885] >

Re: alternatives to flash builder

2013-01-02 Thread Om
, Om [1] http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/buy/buy.jsp#openSource On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Frédéric THOMAS wrote: > After a long time tweaking, building Flex / Maven project using eclipse/FB, > I prefer to use Intellij also because it doesn't need any m2e like tools to > map the m

Re: [DISCUSS] Continuing discussion on Installer 2.0 RC1

2013-01-02 Thread Om
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Om, > > Made the change to build.properties and fixed some typo's in the release > notes. I think RELEASE_NOTES typically also have lists of bugs fixed or > improvements made. Can you add that to the release notes? > > Will do! Thanks, Om

Re: [DISCUSS] Continuing discussion on Installer 2.0 RC1

2013-01-02 Thread Om
or > next week. > > Nick, If you can take a look asap, that would be great. We are probably going to have a couple more RCs and it would be nice to fix as many issues as possible for Installer 2.0. Thanks, Om > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:31 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > >

[DISCUSS] Continuing discussion on Installer 2.0 RC1

2013-01-02 Thread Om
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > > On 1/2/13 12:18 PM, "Om" wrote: > > > Thanks Greg. > > > > Alex, I think it is pretty clear from Greg's response on how we want to > > proceed. Do you have any more clarificat

Re: [MENTORS] Release Policy

2013-01-02 Thread Om
Thanks Greg. Alex, I think it is pretty clear from Greg's response on how we want to proceed. Do you have any more clarifications, or can we go ahead with the [VOTE] for RC1? Thanks, Om On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Greg Reddin wrote: > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Alex Haru

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 RC1

2013-01-02 Thread Om
> > > We don't 'release' the installer badge, but it consumes the same exact > > config xml. Are you saying that we need to release the source for the > > badge as well? > IMO, absolutely. Did we not do this in the prior version? Then we really > messed up that release. I thought the same sour

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 RC1

2013-01-02 Thread Om
On Jan 2, 2013 8:06 AM, "Carol Frampton" wrote: > > > > On 1/2/13 10 :44AM, "Om" wrote: > > >On Jan 2, 2013 6:37 AM, "Carol Frampton" wrote: > >> > >> flex/utilities/trunk/installer/build.properties needs updating > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 RC1

2013-01-02 Thread Om
ch the language in the middle of checking all the license > agreements, whatever I've already checked is cleared. > > Carol > > On 1/1/13 1 :23AM, "Om" wrote: > > >This is version 2.0 of Apache Flex SDK Installer. This version lets users &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 RC1

2013-01-02 Thread Om
4.6/sdks/4.8.0/ > > Carol > That is how I have named the directory for 4.9 on my machine. You are free to name it however you want and update build.properties before running ant. In any case, one cannot guarantee that the path would be same across computers. Thanks, Om

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 RC1

2013-01-02 Thread Om
On Jan 1, 2013 11:44 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > > > On 1/1/13 11:30 PM, "Om" wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> > >> On 1/1/13 11:09 PM, "Om" wr

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 RC1

2013-01-01 Thread Om
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > > On 1/1/13 11:09 PM, "Om" wrote: > > > On Jan 1, 2013 10:42 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > >> > >> Ok, here is my logic: > >> > >> -From [1], a release is &qu

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 RC1

2013-01-01 Thread Om
On Jan 1, 2013 10:42 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > Ok, here is my logic: > > -From [1], a release is "anything that is published beyond the group that > owns it.". Putting the config.xml on the site to be consumed by one of our > binaries makes it part of a release and requires a vote before it hap

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 RC1

2013-01-01 Thread Om
On Jan 1, 2013 9:49 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > > > On 1/1/13 2:18 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote: > > > Wouldn't we want to keep the config file on our website / SVN? It seems to > > me that placing the config file on any of the DISTS would be disasterious, > > as this contains the MD5 chec

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 RC1

2013-01-01 Thread Om
ne of your questions have anything to do with whether config.xml is source or not. I still maintain that it is not. Thanks, Om On Jan 1, 2013 10:49 AM, "Dave Fisher" wrote: > > On Jan 1, 2013, at 10:25 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > OK, so this looks like a recent change.

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 RC1

2013-01-01 Thread Om
On Jan 1, 2013 8:22 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > > > On 1/1/13 1:29 AM, "Om" wrote: > > > The config is not part of the source. There is only a reference to its url > > in the installer app. The installer was designed with this sce

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 RC1

2013-01-01 Thread Om
change the sdk version without having to push an update to the installer. Bundling the config xml with the source or binary will cause issues . Thanks, Om On Jan 1, 2013 12:06 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > Hi, > > > Apache only officially releases (and we are voting on) a sou

[DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK Installer 2.0 RC1

2012-12-31 Thread Om
would like to put up a vote asap and release this right away! Thanks, Om

Re: Prepping for Installer 2.0 RC1

2012-12-31 Thread Om
I have fixed those issues and checked it in. Please give it a run through and see everything works as it should. I have also created a tag for the RC: apache-flex-sdk-installer-2.0.0-RC1 Ready to start a [DISCUSS] Release Candidate 1 thread when you are. Thanks, Om On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 6

Re: Prepping for Installer 2.0 RC1

2012-12-31 Thread Om
On Dec 31, 2012 6:01 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > > Hi, > > > Great! So you mind tagging trunk with 2.0 RC1? > You might have to do it I got an SVN error. May because of my slow connection. I tried twice same error. > svn: '/repos/asf/!svn/bc/1427276/incubator/flex/utilities/trunk' path not found:

Re: Prepping for Installer 2.0 RC1

2012-12-31 Thread Om
Great! So you mind tagging trunk with 2.0 RC1? Thanks, Om On Dec 31, 2012 5:21 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > Hi, > > > Justin, any luck with your issue? > Yep sorted. Made a few minor mods to the build files and notes as well > (see checkins). > > Here y

Re: Prepping for Installer 2.0 RC1

2012-12-31 Thread Om
. Justin, any luck with your issue? Thanks, Om > > On 12/30/12 4:37 PM, "Om" wrote: > > > BTW, the app compiles and runs fine with Apache Flex 4.9/AIR 3.4 when I > run > > it from Flash Builder 4.6. > > > > On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Om wrote:

Re: Prepping for Installer 2.0 RC1

2012-12-30 Thread Om
o add into the SDK. > > Justin > Do you want build it using the installer to see if that problem occurs there as well? Either that or manually copy required dependencies to eliminate any doubts. Om

Re: Prepping for Installer 2.0 RC1

2012-12-30 Thread Om
On Dec 30, 2012 5:10 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm getting a different error: > > packagenative: > [java] SDK is missing file /Users/justinmclean/Documents/air/mac/AdobeAIRSDK/lib/nai/bin/naip > > BUILD FAILED > /Users/justinmclean/Documents/Adobe Flash Builder 4.6/Apache Flex Ut

Re: Prepping for Installer 2.0 RC1

2012-12-30 Thread Om
BTW, the app compiles and runs fine with Apache Flex 4.9/AIR 3.4 when I run it from Flash Builder 4.6. On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Om wrote: > This is the error I am getting when I run ant release. Error in *bold* > > I googled this issue, it looks like quite a few folks have t

Re: Prepping for Installer 2.0 RC1

2012-12-30 Thread Om
ttp://ns.adobe.com/air/applic* *ation/3.4* BUILD FAILED C:\p\flex_os\workspace\flexroot\utilities\trunk\installer\build.xml:291: Java re turned: 12 Total time: 11 seconds On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Om wrote: > On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Justin Mclean > wrote: > >> Hi, >>

Re: Prepping for Installer 2.0 RC1

2012-12-30 Thread Om
> Makes sense. i will get on it now. Mind posting what errors you are seeing? Om

Re: Prepping for Installer 2.0 RC1

2012-12-30 Thread Om
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Are you sure you have checked out utilities/trunk/common/ as well? > > OK it wasn't clear to me that you need to check out all of the utilities > trunk rather than just the installer directory. > > We'll need to add instructions to

Re: Prepping for Installer 2.0 RC1

2012-12-30 Thread Om
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Are you sure you have checked out utilities/trunk/common/ as well? > > Nope as that's not included in the build instructions. > > It says to check out source and just run this: > ant build [-DFLEX_HOME=/path/to/apache/flex/sdk] > [

Re: Prepping for Installer 2.0 RC1

2012-12-30 Thread Om
On Dec 30, 2012 2:54 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > > Hi, > > BTW for a RC we'd need to remove the incubating DISCLAIMER and RELEASE_NOTES need a license header. > > Justin > Feel free to make the changes and check them in. I will cut a new build once you are done. Thanks Om

Re: Prepping for Installer 2.0 RC1

2012-12-30 Thread Om
On Dec 30, 2012 2:34 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > > Hi, > > Looks like something isn't quite right in the build file on OSX. > > [mxmlc] command line: Error: unable to open '/Users/justinmclean/Documents/Adobe Flash Builder 4.6/Apache Flex Installer/../common/src' > > Any idea why the ".." is

Re: Prepping for Installer 2.0 RC1

2012-12-30 Thread Om
On Dec 30, 2012 1:40 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > > Hi, > > > Trunk is good to go. > Any reason we're working in trunk and not develop? Seems a little inconsistent. > We decided to work on trunk for the installer since it has low traffic. And this decision was made before the rules for sdk branc

Re: Prepping for Installer 2.0 RC1

2012-12-30 Thread Om
ow the steps in the RELEASE_GUIDE to cut a release build. Once you have the artifacts build, upload it to some location in your people.apache.org site and I will download them and put it in my people.a.o site along with the rest of the artifacts Thanks, Om [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33186

Re: Flex 4.9 announcement and the installer

2012-12-27 Thread Om
ally announce 4.9 if we go down this path. > That is correct. > Perhaps we just announce it now and say new installer coming soon? > > Thanks, > Justin I vote for announcing both at the same time. The extra time would probably help us with settling the release locations. Thanks, Om

Re: Flex 4.9 announcement and the installer

2012-12-27 Thread Om
Justin +1 I will try to work on the installer v2 RC very soon. Thanks, Om

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 release on web site

2012-12-27 Thread Om
to be promoted to a release before we cut the first RC for installer v2. Thanks, Om On Dec 27, 2012 7:27 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > The xml file for the installer will need to be changed then we will need a > separate vote on its release. I think we need to hold off on its release &

Re: undated built release notes

2012-12-25 Thread Om
ly end up in develop, > then revert it out of trunk. > > > +1 to selectively reverting from trunk as a special case this time. The better approach would be revert trunk to the 4.8 tag before merging the 4.9 branch. Thanks, Om > > Justin > > -- > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Team > Adobe Systems, Inc. > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9 RC7

2012-12-24 Thread Om
+1 (Binding) PGP signatures for src kit and binaries look good. ant main build successful Tested binary kit with Installer v2 (with FP 11.1 and AIR 3.4) Flash Builder 4.6 recognizes it as a valid SDK Smoke test projects for Flex and AIR projects compile and run fine Thanks, Om On Mon, Dec 24

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9 RC7

2012-12-24 Thread Om
rt of the release, in future, I think we should add the KEYs file to the release candidate to make things a little easier for committers to test. > > Thanks, > Justin You could upload the .asc file to your home directory on people.apache.orgas well. Thanks, Om

[DISCUSS] [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9 RC7

2012-12-24 Thread Om
Justin, I dont see your PGP key here [1] According to this page [2], the release manager's public key should be present on that page for users to verify the artifacts. Thanks, Om [1] http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/flex/KEYS [2] http://incubator.apache.org/flex/download

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] APACHE FLEX 4.9 RC6

2012-12-23 Thread Om
gt; Justin > I don't see a vote thread for RC7. It would be better if we have discussion about RC7 in its own thread. Thanks, Om

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] APACHE FLEX 4.9 RC6

2012-12-23 Thread Om
changes to the package has to be signed again which works need a new RC. Thanks, Om > > Thanks, > Justin

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 4

2012-12-22 Thread Om
And oh, the swfobject issue I had in earlier RCs have gone away now. Not sure what fixed that. On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Om wrote: > I tested with the installer and Flex 4.9 RC6 looks good to me. I switched > up the sdk-installer-config.xml file to point to RC6 in case anyon

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 4

2012-12-22 Thread Om
I tested with the installer and Flex 4.9 RC6 looks good to me. I switched up the sdk-installer-config.xml file to point to RC6 in case anyone else wants to test. Thanks, Om On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > We'll try to make RC6 work. I am downloading it now. >

Re: Installer language selection issue

2012-12-21 Thread Om
On Dec 21, 2012 2:10 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > Om, > Do you have any objections if I > re-arrange that to require the use of file:// URLs to speed up testing? > Then we'll always be using the same code paths. I will also use file:// to > skip the mir

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9 RC5

2012-12-21 Thread Om
6. > > Did you update the sdk-installer-config.xml in the src folder to point to RC5? Did you confirm by downloading the binaries manually and verifying that the signature doesn't match? Om > On 12/20/12 2:59 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > > > Hi, > > > >>

Re: [jira] [Updated] (FLEX-33326) RuntimeLocale.as for the Apache Flex Installer needs to be updated for the French language

2012-12-21 Thread Om
Frederic, please commit it into SVN yourself? That would be a much easier workflow. Thanks Om On Dec 21, 2012 6:51 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS (JIRA)" wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tab

Re: [FalconJx] New JavaScript runtime format prototype

2012-12-21 Thread Om
Obligatory xkcd reference ;-) http://xkcd.com/386/ On Dec 21, 2012 12:26 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: > Frank, > > I was writing a very long and detailed reply to your very long and > detailed reply to my ... (ad infinitum, it seems), debunking or > countering most of your claims, when I realised

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Flex_SDK_build #402

2012-12-20 Thread Om
ource code is shared however. Not 100% sure. > We have the "Discard Old Builds" option selected. Should we try keeping old builds? That should help with download issues, perhaps? Thanks, Om

Re: Installer language selection issue

2012-12-20 Thread Om
ing ones. > > It's been a while since I've worked around these, so maybe this is not the > solution at all... let me know what you think and how should this be > addressed. > Cheers, > Chema > > > I think your analysis makes sense. Please go ahead and make the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9 RC5

2012-12-20 Thread Om
r releasing as 'incubating' after we have graduated. Can we wait until our top level domain is up and running before we release? I am sure we are not going to get enough testing done with most of us gone for the holidays. Om

Re: Installer language selection issue

2012-12-20 Thread Om
Bump... The more people who can help test the Installer with other languages, the better it would be for us to make a confident release. Please take a look when you get a chance. Source code is available here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/utilities/trunk Thanks, Om On Thu

Installer language selection issue

2012-12-20 Thread Om
Commit 1424368 (hopefully) fixes this issue. Stefan Horochovec had provided this patch a while ago and attached it to the JIRA bug: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33223 Can you please test it and see if the issue is gone? Thanks, Om On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Chema Balsas

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 4

2012-12-19 Thread Om
I remember there was a fix submitted as a patch. I am not sure if that was committed. Erik, do you remember what happened to that patch? Om On Dec 19, 2012 12:22 PM, "Chema Balsas" wrote: > Hi, > > I was checking the installer, and was starting to add a translation for

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 4

2012-12-19 Thread Om
esponding config url. A pretty straightforward implementation. But this could wait until Installer 2.5 if we dont want to hold up Flex 4.9 release. Thanks, Om

OneClickMustella 0.1 - take it for a spin

2012-12-19 Thread Om
ou should also see the FP debugger player popping up and run tests. Sit back and enjoy the test run. In the end, you should see a tests success or failure message. As you will see, the UI is quite bad. I will worry about that later :-) This whole thing now runs end to end and I wanted to quickly share it with the team. More coming... Thanks, Om

Re: svn commit: r1423770 - /incubator/flex/sdk/branches/release4.9/mustella/MustellaResultsParser.java

2012-12-18 Thread Om
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > HI, > > > It is for checkintests to pass in French OS. I think it is ok to take. > > Sadly not - I think it just broke the check in test for english. > > https://builds.apache.org/job/Flex_SDK_checkin_tests/28/console > > Justin > BTW, thi

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3

2012-12-18 Thread Om
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > > On 12/18/12 10:37 PM, "Om" wrote: > > > > Well, we just enabled checkintests on Jenkins... > Yeah, but it will run in english, so his fix is not required. > > Got it. Missed that part.

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3

2012-12-18 Thread Om
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > > On 12/18/12 10:15 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Adding "else if (s.startsWith("Avertissement"))" to the > > MustellaResultsParser.java makes the checkintests pass, thanks Alex, > where > > am I suppose to check in that,

Re: Checkintests on Jenkins

2012-12-18 Thread Om
; Justin Yup, finally we have a cron job that actually tests the shit we check in! The copy job was predicated on the presence of the string "build timed out". I altered the job to add a search for "passed" or "build timed out" condition. Everything looks good now :-) Next up - getting the Mustella tests to work on Jenkins! Om

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 4

2012-12-18 Thread Om
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Using the Installer :-) > Well that would be likely a bug with the installer :-) > > makeApacheFlexForFlashBuilder.sh runs the swfobject-download target in the > framework/download.xml file, that downloads > http://swfobject.googlec

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 4

2012-12-18 Thread Om
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > I still have the swfobject.js issue with web based flex applications. If > > someone could take a look at that, it would be good. > > I've not see that issue nor can I reproduce it here. I tested several web > based applications. >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 4

2012-12-18 Thread Om
one could take a look at that, it would be good. Thanks, Om

Re: Checkintests on Jenkins

2012-12-18 Thread Om
It looks like it went through fine in the end. I am going to look at why flashlog.txt dint get copied over this time though. Om On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Looks like we're almost there. I think the tests were run and they passed, > but t

Fwd: Jenkins build is back to normal : Flex_SDK_checkin_tests #25

2012-12-18 Thread Om
Checkintests now pass on Jenkins! It was the absence of mm.cfg and the flashplayer trust files on the build machine that was causing the build to fail. I will start tweaking the two jobs to make them more efficient soon. Thanks, Om -- Forwarded message -- From: Apache Jenkins

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 4

2012-12-18 Thread Om
On Dec 18, 2012 2:34 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > > > On 12/18/12 11:15 AM, "Om" wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Carol Frampton wrote: > > > >> -1 The SDK is almost there but now that the README mentions the installer &g

Re: We need your help testing Flex 4.9 with various Flash Player versions

2012-12-18 Thread Om
On Dec 18, 2012 2:27 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > > Hi, > > > I would say that it is up to him (Justin, your thoughts?) I am all for > > releasing sooner than later, but we need to follow the steps in the right > > order. > > Given that most users of the SDK are going to use the default of FP 11

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3

2012-12-18 Thread Om
ime to its corresponding AIR runtime (ex. 11.4 goes with AIR 3.4) With these assumptions, the number of combinations would be more like: OS version (at least 2) x compile for FP/AIR (x8) = 16 combinations. More manageable, IMHO. Thanks, Om

Re: We need your help testing Flex 4.9 with various Flash Player versions

2012-12-18 Thread Om
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > > On 12/18/12 10:32 AM, "Om" wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> > >> On 12/18/12 9:50 AM, "Om" wro

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 4

2012-12-18 Thread Om
.org/message/ka5vmji5advcq7c7 Thanks, Om

Re: We need your help testing Flex 4.9 with various Flash Player versions

2012-12-18 Thread Om
In theory, yes. But the RCs are changing so fast that it is hard to keep track of. Since the next RC is going to be cut from the release branch, I think testing the release branch should be fine. Om On Dec 18, 2012 9:35 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > > On 12/18/12

Re: We need your help testing Flex 4.9 with various Flash Player versions

2012-12-18 Thread Om
ng on the* 4.9 release branch*: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/sdk/branches/release4.9 And let us stick to *en_US *for now. It seems that other locales cannot be tested easily. More on that later. Thanks, Om On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > On it,

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3

2012-12-17 Thread Om
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote: > I can't avoid it any longer ;P Karma always gets you in the end ;-) I can update the wiki for you in the meantime. Om

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3

2012-12-17 Thread Om
Perfect! Thanks for this. I have updated the page with assignments. I will start a new thread calling for folks to help with the testing. Om On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Sorry to do this, but can you please post a wiki page with detailed >

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3

2012-12-17 Thread Om
playerversion, swfversion and > > locale in flex-config.xml? > > Yep you change the properties then rebuild that correct. > > Thanks, > Justin > Sorry to do this, but can you please post a wiki page with detailed instructions (like I am a 5 year old)? Its hard to follow this thread :-) Thanks, Om

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3

2012-12-17 Thread Om
n in the > README, but all of them haven;t been tested yet to my knowledge. > > Justin If you could publish the steps for compiling and testing against a particular version of the Flash Player, I (and hopefully a few others) can chip in and test all the versions. Thanks, Om

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3

2012-12-17 Thread Om
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Carol Frampton wrote: > > > On 12/17/12 3 :00AM, "Om" wrote: > > >I was thinking of adding a dropdown box for the various Flash Players swcs > >(11.1 through 11.5) and AIR SDK versions (3.1 through 3.5) - so that it is >

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3

2012-12-17 Thread Om
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > I was thinking of adding a dropdown box for the various Flash Players > swcs > > (11.1 through 11.5) and AIR SDK versions (3.1 through 3.5) - so that it > is > > easy for users to chose the runtimes they want to target. > Nice idea

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3

2012-12-17 Thread Om
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > > On 12/16/12 2:45 AM, "Om" wrote: > > > > My smoke test Flex project compiled fine, but the app did not show up in > > the browser (tried on IE8, Firefox 17.0.1) This is the browser

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3

2012-12-17 Thread Om
I was thinking of adding a dropdown box for the various Flash Players swcs (11.1 through 11.5) and AIR SDK versions (3.1 through 3.5) - so that it is easy for users to chose the runtimes they want to target. Is it that simple, or should this selection happen during the compilation of the SDK? On

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3

2012-12-16 Thread Om
ml Line 69 The source code for the new version of the Installer is available here [1] Oh btw, I re-enabled the locale choosing functionality that we disabled for v1 release. If folks can start testing the various locales and fixing any related issues, that would be great. Thanks, Om

Re: Flash Builder issues and 4.9 release candidate

2012-12-14 Thread Om
I think that we should at least support FB 4.6 and 4.7 with a Flex SDK release. We don't know if this would work with any other IDE. This version of the SDK would be pretty much useless if we don't support FB. Thanks, Om On Dec 13, 2012 11:25 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:

Re: Flash Builder 4.6/4.7 and Apache Flex

2012-12-13 Thread Om
a Flex SDK". Anyone know exactly what FB 4.7 expects where? > > Thanks, > Justin > > Did you try the installer with 4.8? Does it work with FB 4.7? I remember Carol mentioning that the scripts are out of date. Thanks, Om

Apache Flex Community Revue December 2012

2012-12-13 Thread Om
...is available here: http://www.spoon.as/2012/apache-flex-community-revue-december-2012/ Thanks, Om

Re: Release target and Jenekins

2012-12-13 Thread Om
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Om wrote: > I believe that the mm.cfg file is missing on the windows slave. How would > I get this added on to that server? Should I send an email to > bui...@apache.org? > > Once we have that, we should at least get to know what is happening

Re: Release target and Jenekins

2012-12-13 Thread Om
I believe that the mm.cfg file is missing on the windows slave. How would I get this added on to that server? Should I send an email to bui...@apache.org? Once we have that, we should at least get to know what is happening by looking at the flashlog.txt dump. Thanks, Om On Thu, Dec 13, 2012

Re: Release target and Jenekins

2012-12-13 Thread Om
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Yeah, it seems like there is some secret place that the Global Settings > are > > stored. You might want to run a dummy swf and see what the right-click > > global settings say are trusted locations. > > Can you add a trusted locat

Re: Release target and Jenekins

2012-12-13 Thread Om
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Om wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > >> Ant main checkintests takes like 12 minutes for me. The checkintests take >> only the last two minutes or so. It sure seems like the player is hanging >> on >>

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >