Hi,
I also sent it to the flex-users group it may be of interest the users as well.
Justin
Is there a reason why Spoon's monthly emails (Apache Flex Community Revue)
are not sent to this group? The monthly emails provide a ton of
information in a short and easy to read format and would be a good thing
the members of this list to read through.
Thanks,
Om
Hi,
> Okay then, is there a road-map or a plan in this project??
Being an open source project there is no roadmap as such. People are free to
work on whatever they want when they want.
If enough users of the SDK think a feature is important it's probably more
likely that it gets implemented.
>
Adobe does not control Flex any more. The future of Flex is up to the Apache
Flex community. Some Adobe employees, including me, are merely members of this
community.
I'm new to the Apache process, but I don't think it involves imposed goals,
milestones, or schedules. Instead, contributors cont
Hi,
Thanks Peter for clearing things regarding `mobile`.
Still... have a few more things that I would like to know.
1) In regards with `-apollo` and `-browser`
If a test has been done by `Projector content debugger`(standalone)
do we still need to test them on `-apollo` and `-browser`?
Can I e
Hi,
Not wanting to feed the troll too much, I'm just going to direct you
to the archives of this mailing list [1] and the Spoon website [2].
The issues you bring up have already been adequately addressed and the
project is moving forward.
If you do not agree, you are free to join the community an
Hi,
Plz do some paperwork before asking questions.
Here you can find some information about Apache Flex.
http://www.spoon.as/
http://incubator.apache.org/flex
You can follow the mailing list and help apache flex grow.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Pepe wrote:
> Hi, Omar
>
> hmm, good poi
Apache Flex road-map is available at:
https://cwiki.apache.org/FLEX/roadmap.html
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Pepe wrote:
> Hi, Omar
>
> hmm, good point.
> Okay then, is there a road-map or a plan in this project??
> I don't know exactly what is a open source project.
> But the project whi
Hi, Omar
hmm, good point.
Okay then, is there a road-map or a plan in this project??
I don't know exactly what is a open source project.
But the project which I know has a plan and a schedule always.
I have heard that the purpose of this project-members are paperwork,
management of community and
On 9/11/12 8:55 PM, "pepe.f...@gmail.com" wrote:
> Hi, Alex
>
> Which one is not correct? And Which one is correct?
> 1. Flex SDK team was already broke up a few months ago.
> 2. There is no main developer for unfinished Flex 4.6 components.
>
Both are incorrect. And, it doesn't really
What is your point exactly? This list is meant for developers that want to
contribute to the advancement of the Apache Flex SDK. If you have questions
for Adobe I would suggest you post on their forums. If you wish to help
with Apache Flex SDK development you can checkout the code and submit
patche
Hi, Alex
Which one is not correct? And Which one is correct?
1. Flex SDK team was already broke up a few months ago.
2. There is no main developer for unfinished Flex 4.6 components.
thanks
Shigeru Nakagaki
2012/9/12 Alex Harui :
>
>
>
> On 9/11/12 6:34 PM, "pepe.f...@gmail.com" wrote:
>
Glad to see Flex is making strides!
On 9/11/12 6:34 PM, "pepe.f...@gmail.com" wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I heard that Flex SDK team was already broke up a few months ago.
> And currently just two people(?) are working on development of
> unfinished Flex 4.6 components in their spare time. I mean the
On 9/11/12 6:34 PM, "pepe.f...@gmail.com" wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I heard that Flex SDK team was already broke up a few months ago.
> And currently just two people(?) are working on development of
> unfinished Flex 4.6 components in their spare time. I mean they have
> main tasks besides Flex.
>
On 9/11/2012 7:24 PM, Raju Bitter wrote:
I'd check a zipped version of the docs into Subversion.
I'm pretty sure that it is an "Apache Way" no no to put binary files
into the repository if it can be avoided. In this case, I don't believe
zipping up generated docs is an unavoidable approach.
On 9/11/2012 7:13 PM, Gordon Smith wrote:
How shall we make Falcon's Javadoc available?
1. Require developers to build it locally with 'ant javadoc'.
2. Have a build machine which builds it and posts it somewhere.
3. Check it into the Subversion repository somewhere.
- Gordon
I vote 1 and 2
On 9/11/12 7 :13PM, "Gordon Smith" wrote:
>How shall we make Falcon's Javadoc available?
>
>1. Require developers to build it locally with 'ant javadoc'.
I believe this choice would be the Apache way.
Carol
>2. Have a build machine which builds it and posts it somewhere.
>3. Check it into th
I'd check a zipped version of the docs into Subversion. Easy to
download, and you don't have a large number of generated files in the
repository. Most people interested in the docs will probably want the
code anyway, I'm not sure the docs need to be posted to a public URL.
- Raju
How shall we make Falcon's Javadoc available?
1. Require developers to build it locally with 'ant javadoc'.
2. Have a build machine which builds it and posts it somewhere.
3. Check it into the Subversion repository somewhere.
- Gordon
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/11/12 1:00 PM, "Om" wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Carol Frampton
> wrote:
> >
> >> 2. When testing the installer I noticed the following.
> >>
> >>
> >> - On the License Agreement page, I can click, "I Agree, Insta
On 9/11/12 1:00 PM, "Om" wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Carol Frampton wrote:
>
>> 2. When testing the installer I noticed the following.
>>
>>
>> - On the License Agreement page, I can click, "I Agree, Install" without
>> reading any of the licenses or even seeing which licens
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Carol Frampton wrote:
>
>
> On 9/11/12 3 :52PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
> >My main objection was about the content of Readme that Erik fixed
> >yesterday.
> >
> >Carol apparently fixed the FLEX_HOME issue. I will try to take another
> >look
> >today. The questio
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Carol Frampton wrote:
> +.9 - would prefer to see my first 3 items under 2. fixed
>
> 1. I just updated build.xml (and the README to reflect the change) so that
> FLEX_HOME can be set as an environment variable. You can chose to take
> this change or not.
>
> If
On 9/11/12 3 :52PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>My main objection was about the content of Readme that Erik fixed
>yesterday.
>
>Carol apparently fixed the FLEX_HOME issue. I will try to take another
>look
>today. The question is whether the FLEX_HOME issue and other stuff Carol
>found warrant a re-
My main objection was about the content of Readme that Erik fixed yesterday.
Carol apparently fixed the FLEX_HOME issue. I will try to take another look
today. The question is whether the FLEX_HOME issue and other stuff Carol
found warrant a re-kit and new vote or not.
-Alex
On 9/11/12 12:31
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> OK, figured out #6 was my problem (was picking up an Falcon file). So,
> changing my vote to +0.9 (because of the ReadMe and FLEX_HOME issues).
>
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>
>
Alex,
On 9/11/12 12 :10PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>
>On 9/11/12 8:57 AM, "Carol Frampton" wrote:
>
>>
>> 4. I can't find it in the docs at the moment so I'm not totally
>>positive
>> but I thought we were suppose to have a KEYS file along with all the
>>other
>> Apache files in the top-level src
On 9/11/12 8:57 AM, "Carol Frampton" wrote:
>
> 4. I can't find it in the docs at the moment so I'm not totally positive
> but I thought we were suppose to have a KEYS file along with all the other
> Apache files in the top-level src directory.
>
I think the mentors are ok with having a sin
+.9 - would prefer to see my first 3 items under 2. fixed
1. I just updated build.xml (and the README to reflect the change) so that
FLEX_HOME can be set as an environment variable. You can chose to take
this change or not.
If FLEX_HOME is not set with -DFLEX_HOME=/path/to/flex/sdk on the ant
co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13452996#comment-13452996
]
Raju Bitter commented on FLEX-33196:
The manifest file is generated as part of the Ant
Raju Bitter created FLEX-33196:
--
Summary: Incomplete classpath in MANIFEST.MF of falcon-mxmlc.jar
Key: FLEX-33196
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33196
Project: Apache Flex
Issue
I've created a new issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33196
Here is the corresponding snippet from the jar Ant target in
compiler/build.xml (line #281):
Should I file a bug?
- Raju
I found the problem: the classpath is not set correctly in falcon-mxmlc.jar.
Here is the content of MANIFEST.MF:
Manifest-Version: 1.0
Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.8.2
Created-By: 1.6.0_35-b10 (Sun Microsystems Inc.)
Sealed: false
Implementation-Title: ActionScript Compiler - MXMLC Command Line Compi
I've followed the README file, and manage to run the build process of
Falcon on Ubuntu 12.04 JDK 1.6.0_35 using the Ant target
ant dist.flex.sdk
A ZIP file with the SDK is is generated in compiler/generated/dist/falcon.zip.
When I unzip the SDK and try to run the mxmlc using the shell script,
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> ...That's
> what the convenience binaries are for, IMHO. Having those available
> from the Apache 'network' (which for all intends and purposes the
> mirrors act like) will make most people trust them implicitly (yes,
> not a good idea, agre
>> ...I'm thinking that even though binaries are not official Apache Flex
>> releases (http://incubator.apache.org/flex/about-binaries.html, thanks
>> Bertrand), people will still 'trust' them more if they are actually
>> hosted on an Apache mirror then on a random site
>
> That would be a big
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> ...I'm thinking that even though binaries are not official Apache Flex
> releases (http://incubator.apache.org/flex/about-binaries.html, thanks
> Bertrand), people will still 'trust' them more if they are actually
> hosted on an Apache mirro
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Jonathan Campos wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> Yeah, I've been wondering if Spoon could/should/would be that distributor
>> of binaries. They could even try to get distribution rights to Adobe stuff
>> as
>> well so the package
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bertrand Delacretaz resolved FLEX-33186.
Resolution: Won't Fix
According to Erik, this signing is only about convenience bin
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
>> That's assuming there are such signed files in the source release that
>> we're voting on, if that's only about convenience binaries we can
>> ignore all this for the release vote.
>
> It's only the binaries that are signed. The process to d
Hi
I'll be there ... really looking forward to meeting some of you guys :-)
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Justin Mclean [mailto:justinmcl...@gmail.com] Im Auftrag von Justin Mclean
Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. September 2012 00:28
An: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: [OT] ApacheC
Hi,
> I'll be there with my "OSGi for mere mortals" talk, so not much to do
> with Flex but I'd be happy to meet folks there!
Great - see you there.
I'd guess my talk is going to be the only one on Flex but we'll know when the
schedule comes out.
Thanks,
Justin
> That's assuming there are such signed files in the source release that
> we're voting on, if that's only about convenience binaries we can
> ignore all this for the release vote.
It's only the binaries that are signed. The process to do this from
source and the way to obtain the necessary keys a
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> ...Is anyone else intending on being at the conference? Be nice to put some
> faces to names
I'll be there with my "OSGi for mere mortals" talk, so not much to do
with Flex but I'd be happy to meet folks there!
-Bertrand
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Om wrote:
> ...Erik has fixed:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33188 and
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33195
Thanks, those look good to me. I'm still unclear about FLEX-33186, I
think a better explanation of why files need to be signed
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> ...What would we have to do to push the new KEYS file to dist? I can confirm
> it appeared to be correct in SVN (trunk/KEYS). Does any push to dist
> require a vote or other approval?...
You can update the KEYS file at http://apache.org/dist/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13452800#comment-13452800
]
Bertrand Delacretaz commented on FLEX-33188:
Looks good to me, thanks: the "di
48 matches
Mail list logo
