On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> On 9/11/12 1:00 PM, "Om" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Carol Frampton <cfram...@adobe.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> 2.  When testing the installer I noticed the following.
> >>
> >>
> >> - On the License Agreement page, I can click, "I Agree, Install" without
> >> reading any of the licenses or even seeing which license applies to
> which
> >> component.
> >>
> >
> > This is a feature.  It was discussed here on the list [1] and approved
> via
> > lazy consensus.
>
> I'm not convinced many folks saw this discussion point as a [LAZY].  At
> least, I didn't notice it before.  Looking at it again, I would say the
> text
> should be more explicit as in "I agree to all options and license".
>
>
I cant force people to read my emails :-)  The point is, I raised the issue
and no one objected.  Silence is consent.

But now, I will make this change as you suggested.
I will also show the buttons for MPL and Adobe License by default.  That
way, the licenses are at least readily available for perusing.


>  >
> >
> >> - The Adobe embedded font support is listed as Adobe Fontswf utility
> which
> >> isn't really accurate.  I might want embedded font support but care less
> >> about the utility and I wouldn't know to install this component.
> >>
> >
> > I am not following you.  What should I change to fix this issue?
> Instead of calling it "Adobe Fontswf Utility", how about "Adobe Embedded
> Font Libraries and Utilities"?
> >
>

I am cool with it.

Thanks,
Om

Reply via email to