README files are also handy when it comes to describing how to set up the
project, build it, list required dependencies etc.
Dirk.
I don't mind either approach (named folders or name in folder name) but I
think we can all agree that we should all add README files to our
whiteboard experiments just for courtesy, you never know how you might
inspire someone to make a new feature or improvement.
-omar
+1
Keep Walking,
~ Sandeep
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Michel Boudreau
wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> I run the #flex channel on freenode.net and would like to mention it on
> the
> website for people looking for help with Flex. We're a fairly active
> channel and the more people that join, t
If it comes to choose between having the BlazeDS project under Flex and
leaving it alone to die then I would personally agree with the above
statements. Bring it in Flex for now.
Either way, if the project evolves on its own then it might be possible to
separate the two. Am I missing something here
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Doug Arthur wrote:
> Why not just require a README.txt in each whiteboard folder, and the
> responsible developer can place valuable notes on the work being done,
> including if they want everyone else hands off.
>
Like the README.txt. Great addition.
I still wou
On Jan 9, 2012 5:01 PM, "Rui Silva" wrote:
> Yet another approach that is kind of middle ground would be to not
separate
> by username, but to include the author's username in the branch name
> alongside with the feature of the branch (I think it was Omar who
suggested
> this).
Why not just requi
Hi Peter,
I totally understand what you're trying to say and I have doubts myself
about the confusion that might arise not so much regarding ownership, which
is less important in such a project, but more regarding whether that
particular branch is open for contribution or if the author would pr
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Peter Elst wrote:
> I'm just asking because with the username in the folder, the situation
> could arise that the code was originally put in the whiteboard by own
> committer but 99% of the code got contributed by somebody else.
>
In my case I wasn't worried about
Quoting Peter Elst :
I don't think I have to say that I would never go into something and
delete stuff without talking to the contributor.
my mistake, sorry Mike - so in general lets say somebody wants to work on
something in the whiteboard, would you create your own copy of it or put it
in
> I don't think I have to say that I would never go into something and
> delete stuff without talking to the contributor.
>
my mistake, sorry Mike - so in general lets say somebody wants to work on
something in the whiteboard, would you create your own copy of it or put it
in the original folder?
Quoting Peter Elst :
Sounds like things need to be talked about here, I would suggest you list
out some other things if you have them.
Also agree with Jonathan on getting some structure in the whiteboard and
using username folders.
It would be good to know how we define the whiteboard stuff
> Sounds like things need to be talked about here, I would suggest you list
> out some other things if you have them.
>
Also agree with Jonathan on getting some structure in the whiteboard and
using username folders.
It would be good to know how we define the whiteboard stuff, I assumed it
was p
Quoting Jonathan Campos :
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Michael Schmalle
wrote:
Sounds like things need to be talked about here, I would suggest you list
out some other things if you have them.
I can't remember the exact response but I want to say it was shown in
previous examples to be
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
> Sounds like things need to be talked about here, I would suggest you list
> out some other things if you have them.
I can't remember the exact response but I want to say it was shown in
previous examples to be using the username.
I wasn'
On Jan 9, 2012, at 3:22 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
> Quoting Jonathan Campos :
>
>> I'm watching the whiteboard and it would be great if people could keep the
>> whiteboard separated by originator's name.
>>
>> whiteboard
>> > jonbcampos
>> > content
>> > etc
I would agree with Jon on this.
Quoting Jonathan Campos :
I'm watching the whiteboard and it would be great if people could keep the
whiteboard separated by originator's name.
whiteboard
> jonbcampos
> content
> etc
This way we don't conflict with:
whiteboard
> di
> di-idea2
> different-di-idea
> tabnavigator
> tab
I guess I'll have to chime in here then :)
Right now I think having AOP as a framework feature is the most realistic,
once Falcon fully drops
we might start to see compile-time weaving, but for run-time dynamic
proxies it might be an idea to
make it a framework feature.
I am the author of as3common
I'm watching the whiteboard and it would be great if people could keep the
whiteboard separated by originator's name.
whiteboard
> jonbcampos
> content
> etc
This way we don't conflict with:
whiteboard
> di
> di-idea2
> different-di-idea
> tabnavigator
> tabnavigator2
> nother-tabnav
>>AOP is probably a language thing, which we do not have control of.
Fair point Alex, AOP probably would better be a language feature rather
than a framework feature. Though we might see something sooner if we
implement it as a framework feature.
Having said that if enough f the micro-architecture
Jeff wrote:
> While Blaze would make most sense as its own project, I agree with
Alex's
> assessment that it would be better to bring it in under this, rather
than
> have it die on the vine if there are not adequate contributors to get it
as
> its own.
>
Definitely +1 on this. I'd rather have
Hey everyone,
I run the #flex channel on freenode.net and would like to mention it on the
website for people looking for help with Flex. We're a fairly active
channel and the more people that join, the better the help. It used to be
the "Unofficial Adobe Flex Channel"; maybe we can make it the o
Are we ready to start, can we blog the competition?
On 9 January 2012 19:37, Anne Kathrine Petterøe wrote:
> On 9 January 2012 18:20, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
> >
> > Don't you want to add some information about what people win?
> >
> > IMO the only prize is that we'll give credit somewhere
On 1/9/12 12:15 PM, "Doug McCune" wrote:
>
> Alex, does the Apache style of individual user contributions lend itself
> better to flushing this out? This is clearly something you've been working
> on at Adobe, but does the fact that Flex is now an Apache project and you
> are acting as an ind
>
> My current thoughts are to create a framework that is very granular and
> uses
> lots of composition. I have prototypes where HelloWorld is a 28K swf.
Alex, does the Apache style of individual user contributions lend itself
better to flushing this out? This is clearly something you've been w
ahh.. I didn't read it.
I replied to the address and it unsubscribed.
thanks
Shigeru Nakagaki
2012/1/10 Dave Fisher :
>
> On Jan 9, 2012, at 7:32 AM, Douglas Arthur wrote:
>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Pepe [mailto:pepe.f...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 8:18 AM
>>>
On 9 January 2012 18:20, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
> Don't you want to add some information about what people win?
>
> IMO the only prize is that we'll give credit somewhere on the Flex
> site to whoever creates the winning logo, I think it would be good to
> mention that.
I agree with Betrand
It doesn't have to be a cash prize - perhaps something useful for the
contributor? A limited edition t-shirt with the new logo signed by all the
initial committers... a years supply of bacon... a ride on a unicorn.
--
Rick Winscot
On Monday, January 9, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Jonathan Campos wrot
On 1/9/12 10:31 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
> Alex, can you say what your framework classes are based on? Is this
> something where mobile and multi-touch can be used/composed but the
> framework not dependent on them?
My current thoughts are to create a framework that is very granular and
Quoting Alex Harui :
On 1/9/12 8:15 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
* Dinamic View States
...We need the capability to create states on the fly and let
other parts handle this dinamic view states (transitions,...). Without
this, view states are a bit limited.
Adobe has some work in this area
On 1/9/12 8:45 AM, "Jonathan Campos" wrote:
> I agree that "dynamic view states" isn't exactly clear to me.
This is probably just MXML/AS equivalence. Can you do everything in AS that
you can do in MXML. It is not quite possible or very hard for states and
transitions today.
> I could see
On 1/9/12 8:15 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
> * Dinamic View States
>
> ...We need the capability to create states on the fly and let
> other parts handle this dinamic view states (transitions,...). Without
> this, view states are a bit limited.
>
Adobe has some work in this area that will lik
+1 global reformatting.
I am new to this but what I was thinking was to have a formatted style that
is for the project and then one for my own coding taste. When I
checkout/update, I would reformat it to my specifications/style. Once I am
done with the fix, I would then reformat it to the projec
On Jan 7, 2012, at 3:15 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe wrote:
>
> The vote should run for 72 hours:
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html -> the last sentence of
> the "Expressing Votes: +1, 0, -1, and Fractions" section.
>
> Once the vote is over, you can send a [RESULT] [VOTE] mail to the
On Jan 9, 2012, at 10:18 AM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
>
> Honestly I have had no experience with that so I am guessing it's a
> consolidation facility?
>
> Can you just explain a tad, I'm naive. :)
You create a feedback forum. In our case it would be "Apache Flex Logo -
Community Voting". Then
Quoting Greg Reddin :
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Michael Schmalle
wrote:
Any mentors willing to read this and answer by Sunday? I would like to get
this discussed quickly before I commit anything on the site.
I have not yet voted on this. For the record I am +1 on the contest
and the p
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Rick Winscot wrote:
> Any reason we can't take up a collection from everyone on the list - for
> say a few dollars each? Prize money couldn't hurt.
I wouldn't be into this. Bragging rights are more important. I wouldn't
want to set the precedent that being apart
Any reason we can't take up a collection from everyone on the list - for say a
few dollars each? Prize money couldn't hurt.
--
Rick Winscot
On Monday, January 9, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Michael Schmalle (mailto:m...@teotigraphix.com)> w
Might be a good idea for one of the initial committers to commit blank project
files, lock them, and restrict permissions on removing locks.
--
Rick Winscot
On Monday, January 9, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Jeff Tapper wrote:
> +1
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jun Heider [mailto:j...@realey
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
>> IOW, you don't have to list the names.
>
> In general I agree but when voting on committers or PPMC members,
> those votes must be forwarded to the Incubator PMC and there must be
> at least one +1 from a mentor, so some indication of
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Greg Reddin wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> wrote:
>> For instance like this:
>>
>> The vote passes with binding +1s from:
>>
>
> Or it might be easier to say "The vote passes with $X binding +1s, $X
> non-binding +1s, no -1s", et
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> FWIW, I have just removed the "send to" bit which I think was redundant.
I noticed that. Works for me.
Greg
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Greg Reddin wrote:
> ...2. The last lines of the page say: "The authors of the selected Apache
> Flex logo(s) will need to donate them to the Apache Flex project
> according to the Apache individual contributor license: ICLA.txt Send
> to the Apache Flex Mailing Lis
+1
-Original Message-
From: Jun Heider [mailto:j...@realeyes.com]
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 12:12 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: committing .* files
+1 to what Campos said. That's what README are for.
On Jan 9, 2012 9:01 AM, "Roland Zwaga" wrote:
> +1! :)
>
> O
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe
wrote:
> For instance like this:
>
> The vote passes with binding +1s from:
>
Or it might be easier to say "The vote passes with $X binding +1s, $X
non-binding +1s, no -1s", etc..."
IOW, you don't have to list the names.
Greg
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
> I created a new page located at [1]...
I've made minor edits to clarify that it's the development mailing
list that we're using to communicate.
Don't you want to add some information about what people win?
IMO the only prize is that we'l
On 7 January 2012 23:02, Jun Heider wrote:
>
> I'm sure Bertrand can correct me if I'm wrong, but I think we have enough
> binding +1 to call this voted?
The vote should run for 72 hours:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html -> the last sentence of
the "Expressing Votes: +1, 0, -1, and F
+1 (binding)
/Anne
On 7 January 2012 22:07, Peter Elst wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Peter
+ 1 individual dev set up should not be committed
On 9 January 2012 17:11, Jun Heider wrote:
> +1 to what Campos said. That's what README are for.
> On Jan 9, 2012 9:01 AM, "Roland Zwaga" wrote:
>
> > +1! :)
> >
> > On 9 January 2012 16:59, Jonathan Campos wrote:
> >
> > > I'd really love to s
I'm betting that they're porting over the entire flash API to JS to make
conversion nearly 1:1 from an API standpoint.
It seems that the file wasn't attached for some reason... here is the patch
Index: content/flex/mailing-lists.mdtext
===
--- content/flex/mailing-lists.mdtext (revision 1228345)
+++ content/flex/mailing-lists.mdtext (working copy)
+1 to the AOP idea
On 9 January 2012 17:06, Jonathan Campos wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Michael Schmalle >wrote:
>
> > I agree to, something that would deprecate the;
>
>
> It will probably be something I will focus on. So I can get ride of:
>
>
>
>
>
> . . .
>
> And all the o
bringing flex as-is into apache and making it available via standard maven
repository would be great
On 6 Jan 2012, at 15:56, João Saleiro wrote:
>
> On 06-01-2012 15:50, Carlos Rovira wrote:
>> now that we involved in the set up of Apache Flex and Apache is the same
>> house of Maven I would
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
> Any mentors willing to read this and answer by Sunday? I would like to get
> this discussed quickly before I commit anything on the site.
I have not yet voted on this. For the record I am +1 on the contest
and the page with the following t
Quoting Jun Heider :
I can set up a uservoice for voting if you want.
On Jan 9, 2012 10:04 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
Honestly I have had no experience with that so I am guessing it's a
consolidation facility?
Can you just explain a tad, I'm naive. :)
Mike
I can set up a uservoice for voting if you want.
On Jan 9, 2012 10:04 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I created a new page located at [1].
>
> Bertrand seems to agree that one week should be sufficient for entries. He
> also mentioned we could take entries through the hastag #flexlogo or
+1 to what Campos said. That's what README are for.
On Jan 9, 2012 9:01 AM, "Roland Zwaga" wrote:
> +1! :)
>
> On 9 January 2012 16:59, Jonathan Campos wrote:
>
> > I'd really love to see it that people don't keep committing the .* files
> > from Flash Builder.
> >
> > Those, typically, should b
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
> I agree to, something that would deprecate the;
It will probably be something I will focus on. So I can get ride of:
. . .
And all the other code required to make that work.
--
Jonathan Campos
How do you get an entry on that list? I must have missed this. I would
like to add my own.
Thanks
On 09/01/2012 01:25, "Sebastian Mohr" wrote:
>Oh ... I see!
>
>I thought I caught this case with this answer:
>
>"I have developed my own MVC Microarchitecture(s)"
>
>But you are right ... I should
Hi,
I created a new page located at [1].
Bertrand seems to agree that one week should be sufficient for
entries. He also mentioned we could take entries through the hastag
#flexlogo or I guess #ApacheFlex.
I think the easiest way for me to update the site is for any of you
reading this t
Quoting Jonathan Campos :
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
Do you have a use case for dynamic view states? I can honestly say I've
never been limited by the current implementation.
I agree that "dynamic view states" isn't exactly clear to me. I could see a
need to off
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
> Do you have a use case for dynamic view states? I can honestly say I've
> never been limited by the current implementation.
I agree that "dynamic view states" isn't exactly clear to me. I could see a
need to official support for "multi-di
Sorry, in my last email I deleted accidentally the first part:
On 09-01-2012 16:37, Nick Collins wrote:
Out of curiosity, what Maven support are you looking for that Flex-Mojos
doesn't provide, other than being natively integrated into the compiler,
perhaps?
- public repositories for the SDK
Do you have a use case for dynamic view states? I can honestly say
I've never been limited by the current implementation.
In the Flex 3 era you could define states on the fly; but it could be
a pain. I have never dug into the underpinnings of the Spark State
system, though.
On 1/9/2012
- public repositories for the SDK and other components
- plugin to generate flash builder / flashdevelop / FDT / etc project files
- Marvin Froeder subscribed here on the Flex mailing list :o)
João Saleiro
Out of curiosity, what Maven support are you looking for that Flex-Mojos
doesn't provide, other than being natively integrated into the compiler,
perhaps?
Nick Collins
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Carlos Rovira <
carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would want to share my though
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
PMC.
It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 18 January 2012, 10:00:00 PST. The
report
for your podling will
Hi,
I would want to share my thoughts about what changes would like to see in
forthcoming Apache Flex releases (far beyond 4.6.1 that would bring nothing
new AFAIK and will be only serve to put the project in the new Apache
rails). I'm referring to Apache Flex 4.7, 4.8, 4.9...and so on.
This is o
+1! :)
On 9 January 2012 16:59, Jonathan Campos wrote:
> I'd really love to see it that people don't keep committing the .* files
> from Flash Builder.
>
> Those, typically, should be not committed.
>
> --
> Jonathan Campos
>
--
regards,
Roland
--
Roland Zwaga
Senior Consultant | Stack & H
I'd really love to see it that people don't keep committing the .* files
from Flash Builder.
Those, typically, should be not committed.
--
Jonathan Campos
On Jan 9, 2012, at 7:32 AM, Douglas Arthur wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Pepe [mailto:pepe.f...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 8:18 AM
>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: unsubscribe mail address fails
>>
>> I unsubscribed from commit mailing list a
> -Original Message-
> From: Pepe [mailto:pepe.f...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 8:18 AM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: unsubscribe mail address fails
>
> I unsubscribed from commit mailing list and I got the mail of "confirm
> unsubscribe from flex-comm.
> -Original Message-
> From: Pepe [mailto:pepe.f...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 5:33 AM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: unsubscribe mail address fails
>
> ahhh
> The spelling is wrong in http://incubator.apache.org/flex/mailing-lists.html
>
> thanks
I unsubscribed from commit mailing list and I got the mail of "confirm
unsubscribe from flex-comm...@incubator.apache.org".
However still I get commit-mails.
thanks
Shigeru Nakagaki
2012/1/9 Pepe :
> ahhh
> The spelling is wrong in http://incubator.apache.org/flex/mailing-lists.html
>
> tha
>
> They are clearly different.
>
>
yes, you're right... strangely, I only had the FX logo in my mind's eye and
not the FB icon. But that's probably due to the fact that I use Eclipse
with FB linked to it and not standalone.
Dirk.
On 1/9/2012 4:30 AM, Dirk Eismann wrote:
Concerning a squared / minified icon: not sure if we need one. There are
lots of OS projects that do not have a small logo representation. Granted,
we are all used to have a square icon for Flex for years now. But actually
that icon typically referred to F
Regarding Doug's logo proposal, Carlos Rovira said:
>
> The only problem that I see is the close similarity to Plex app (that
btw
> has a very similar name to Flex)
>
> See this : http://www.plexapp.com/
>
There's definitely some resemblance. Not too much, but just enough to make
it somewha
FYI
If there are any other committers that want to get their CMS or svn
chops dirty, feel free to make those changes.
If it's not changed by the time I get back to my other computer, I
will update the site.
Mike
Quoting Bertrand Delacretaz :
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Michael Sch
Ha! True regarding the plex similarity :) good find, I hadn't seen that
before, funny how that works.
Quoting Bertrand Delacretaz :
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Michael Schmalle
wrote:
I just published the draft logo contest on the site [1]...
As I said in the other thread I'd suggest putting that in its own
page, with just an announcement on the front page. This allows us to
keep that p
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
> I just published the draft logo contest on the site [1]...
As I said in the other thread I'd suggest putting that in its own
page, with just an announcement on the front page. This allows us to
keep that page up for as long as we want, whi
You can put an announcement on the front page but I think it's better
to have a specific URL for the contest page, suggest
http://incubator.apache.org/flex/logo-contest.html
The left navigation is defined in
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/site/trunk/templates/leftnav.mdtext
if y
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
> Quoting Bertrand Delacretaz :
>> ...maybe
>> you could publish the contest page at http://incubator.apache.org/flex
>> with a big DRAFT - CONTEST HAS NOT STARTED YET warning, and we can
>> fine tune before announcing the contest?
>>
> ...Y
ahhh
The spelling is wrong in http://incubator.apache.org/flex/mailing-lists.html
thanks
Shigeru Nakagaki
2012/1/9 Doug Arthur :
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Pepe wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> I tried to unsubscribe Commits Mailing List
>> (flex-commmits-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org).
>>
Hi,
I just published the draft logo contest on the site [1]
We still need to figure out;
- How long 1 or 2 weeks (this was discussed but I feel like since it was
on the weekend it could quickly be rehashed again)
- Should we start the contest 01-10-2012
- How are we going to vote for
Quoting Bertrand Delacretaz :
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Michael Schmalle
wrote:
...Any mentors willing to read this and answer by Sunday? I would
like to get
this discussed quickly before I commit anything on the site
I missed that deadline and not sure what the current status i
Hi Dirk!
many thanks for your words!
I would really like to have some icon proposal along with the logo proposal
but this is a bit complicated since requires to get an idea an make it work
with the logo. But as you said, it's not critical and could happen later in
time...I' try to get something (
Hi Doug, great work!.
The only problem that I see is the close similarity to Plex app (that btw
has a very similar name to Flex)
See this : http://www.plexapp.com/
El lunes 9 de enero de 2012, Csomák Gábor escribió:
> Love them, Doug! Both the two-tone black, and the apacheified are awesome!
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
> ...Any mentors willing to read this and answer by Sunday? I would like to get
> this discussed quickly before I commit anything on the site
I missed that deadline and not sure what the current status is - maybe
you could publish the co
w00t - great work Carlos! I really like the horizon / new frontier
metaphor. Almost looks like the logo of a Sci-Fi blockbuster movie
(tagline: "Flex - New Horizons")
Concerning a squared / minified icon: not sure if we need one. There are
lots of OS projects that do not have a small logo represen
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Dimitri k. wrote:
> ...Last but not least, I especially wanted to thank Bertrand, our first
> mentor,
> who, in my opinion, has made a "pixel-perfect" mentoring for now, from the
> proposal and vote handling to this first week set up and support...
Thanks Dimitri
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> On 1/8/12 8:55 AM, "Doug Arthur" wrote:
>
>> Last thing on this note, if we do bring BlazeDS into Apache Flex, how will
>> release management take place, and how will the product remain to be its
>> own within another product? Especially since i
91 matches
Mail list logo
