> Sounds like things need to be talked about here, I would suggest you list
> out some other things if you have them.
>


Also agree with Jonathan on getting some structure in the whiteboard and
using username folders.

It would be good to know how we define the whiteboard stuff, I assumed it
was personal experimental work. Is it expected that others just contribute
to the same package and make changes?

Noticed earlier the .* files from Tink's navigators contribution got
removed by somebody - while that might turn out to be a good best practice
- is the whiteboard contributor not the one who should administer his
experimental area? Its just something for us to decide on how we handle
this and collaborate in whiteboards, not trying to specifically highlight
this as a problem.

- Peter

Reply via email to