On 7/14/2025 12:01 AM, Pragya Vu wrote:
I am having trouble with config the ffmpeg when trying to install it. I
tried to reinstall gcc, do whatever I found on internet but it just don't
work.
Is there a particular reason you can't use a pre-built package? That may
be a lot easier overall.
z!
On 7/4/2025 9:33 AM, thef...@icybiz.com wrote:
On 04.07.25 18:15, Ferdi Scholten wrote:
Why not use ffprobe?
Because I accept user videos and not all clips contain this information:
I've also found that more-than-occasionally the metadata is very wrong,
like a one hour file which says it's
On 6/26/2025 2:44 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
Do you have a URL? "Library of Congress"? About subtitles? I want to
read it.
See my earlier email-
On 6/26/2025 10:06 AM, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
> https://www.loc.gov/preservation/digital/formats//fdd/fdd000571.shtml
> "subtitles
On 6/26/2025 10:32 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
Z. please stop implying that I don't search for answers.
At least an appearance of doing that, the first email of this thread did
not; maybe tell us what you found, where, and why it doesn't answer the
questions. Even question your own assumptions, l
On 6/25/2025 7:01 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
The documentation says that dvdsubs are bit mapped. I don't think so.
I do think so, as do a lot of other people-
https://www.loc.gov/preservation/digital/formats//fdd/fdd000571.shtml
"subtitles are stored as Bitmap images,"
or
https://www.afterdawn.c
On 6/19/2025 7:55 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
You may have a strange idea of what an operating system is.
Ha, ha. You're probably right. I guess I'd say that a real operating
system, as opposed to a pseudo operating system or runtime executive,
must at least have an interrupt driven, preemptive
On 6/19/2025 7:07 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 19/06/2025 18.27, Rob Hallam wrote:
It is published. You can compile and distribute it to your heart's
content- that's one of the great things about Free software.
I'm on Windows. There's no compiler.
There are many compilers* for windows, includ
On 6/19/2025 4:33 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
Did you see the movie "THE MATRIX"? The pill was the blue pill that
evoked conformity.
No.
z!
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscri
On 6/19/2025 6:11 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 19/06/2025 18.09, Rob Hallam wrote:
The internet runs on Linux. Phones run on Linux. Embedded devices run
Linux.
Come on, Rob. The Internet doesn't run on Linux any more than companies
run on Oracle.
And what runs on phones and appliances could h
On 6/19/2025 11:44 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 19/06/2025 12.16, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 6/19/2025 3:37 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
Take a pill, Z.
what is that supposed to mean?
Please answer that.
Why would I search for 'ffmpeg "sost"', Z?
To find out what it could m
On 6/19/2025 3:37 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
I suggest you reread the basic ffmpeg manual at https://
www.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg.html; it's always good to reread the basics,
sometimes useful things pop out afresh.
Take a pill, Z.
what is that supposed to mean?
You folks will never understand a user
On 6/18/2025 2:41 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
Z, how am I or anyone to know what "sost#0:2" means? I don't even know
what "sost" means.
(does that specifically matter? I don't think so.)
After that RTFM? (I think you've used -map before so probably
understand the concept of stream specifiers.)
On 6/18/2025 4:42 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
It fails with a nonsense error message.
If you're referring to-
[sost#0:2 @ 04c5ec80] Automatic encoder selection failed Default
encoder for format mp4 (codec none) is probably disabled. Please choose
an encoder manually.
[sost#0:2 @
On 6/17/2025 10:31 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 17/06/2025 13.27, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
Consider "Quod Gratis Asseritur, Gratis Negatur"* (or "What is
asserted without proof can be denied without proof.") It's your
assertion that "It would make sense to automati
On 6/17/2025 10:10 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
Any of those might make sense in some circumstances, but always? No.
What circumstances, Z?
Don't know and it doesn't matter to me, and I'm not doing someone else's
homework.
Consider "Quod Gratis Asseritur, Gratis Negatur"* (or "What is asserted
On 6/17/2025 10:01 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
It would make sense to automatically decode to 16-bit rgb444.
For you.
That was not a 'Yes' or 'No' response.
OK then, No.
Any of those might make sense in some circumstances, but always? No.
Later,
z!
On 6/14/2025 10:22 PM, FFmpeg via ffmpeg-user wrote:
I can only imagine this means they're using a different version of
FFmpeg. But perhaps it's due to having something like Rogue Amoeba
Loopback installed, or some other application. I tend to doubt it.
Would whoever wrote that actually identi
On 6/10/2025 6:45 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
Now, you can discount what I write, but you can't discount that you code
by trial and error. It's up to you.
Everyone "codes" by trial and error and a part of that process is also
known as "debugging" - almost nothing more complicated than "Hello
worl
On 6/9/2025 1:17 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
what's wrong with you?
Y'know, you could have saved a lot of effort by sending one insulting
email instead of six.
z!
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo
On 6/8/2025 5:46 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
That's the so-called specification. I read it. It's vague. Compared to
MPEG's specifications, it's quite vague.
What's your point? It _is_ the spec for FLAC, no "so-called" about it,
and it does not seem that vague to me. Heck, people have actually
man
On 6/8/2025 12:50 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
I will go with FLAC due to endorsement by the US National Archives
BTW it took me under 2 minutes to find that; a little more research
before asserting things might be productive.
z!
___
ffmpeg-user mailin
On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 6:10 PM Mark Filipak <
markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
Am 08.06.2025 um 19:47 schrieb Mark Filipak:
FLAC is not a standard. I don't trust that it will be around in the
future.
It is, as already covered.
The Internet Engineering Task Force is not a
On 6/8/2025 10:50 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
Thanks, Carl.
Who?? We've been over this before.
How do I do pcm-in-m4a?
You don't, you leave them in well-supported wav files.
z!
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.or
On 6/8/2025 10:43 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
FLAC is not a standard. I don't trust that it will be around in the future.
Leave them in PCM then, that'll be around forever. Want them to be
smaller? gzip the files; sure, you can't just play those directly, but
'archival' doesn't necessarily also m
On 6/2/2025 11:21 PM, Milan Koradiya wrote:
I would appreciate any guidance or suggestions to help resolve this issue.
As mentioned in the mailing list FAQ, please post the complete command
and output to the list (not a screenshot, not as an attachment), then we
can see what you're doing.
h
On 6/1/2025 8:27 PM, Huspnet wrote:
Mediainfo default response will show that with a command line such as:
mediainfo /path/to/mediafile
Does that refer to the AVFoundation output? That's what I was referring to.
z!
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmp
I'm kind of wondering if AVFoundation is lying about the sample rate and
delivering 44.1k when you want 48k. Not sure how you would verify that
on a Mac.
Might also try moving "-ar 48000" to before the "-f" (or remove that
altogether and see what comes out).
Later,
z!
__
On 5/29/2025 11:35 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
117 A filtergraph has a textual representation, which is recognized by
the
118 @option{-filter}/@option{-vf}/@option{-af} and
119 @option{-filter_complex} options in @command{ffmpeg} and
120 @option{-vf}/@option{-af} in @command{ffplay}, and by
On 5/29/2025 9:40 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
I can't "make patches". I'm not a 'C' programmer.
HAVE YOU EVEN LOOKED AT THE DOC SOURCE???
Much of the doc is in textinfo format, not in c. but since apparently
you haven't looked, you might not know that. Try reading
https://git.ffmpeg.org/git
On 5/28/2025 9:33 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 29/05/2025 00.26, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 5/28/2025 2:37 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
There are probably extremely few instances where a name would
rationally
be reused;
Name even a single such instance, Carl. Name reuse to a better filter
could be
On 5/28/2025 2:37 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
There are probably extremely few instances where a name would
rationally
be reused;
Name even a single such instance, Carl. Name reuse to a better filter
could be covered by the
documentation.
Your mission is failed.
My challenge was to Carl.
Nop
On 5/28/2025 12:00 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
By continuing to carry obsolete filters, FFmpeg emasculates itself.
How?
That makes FFmpeg appear to be chaotic and ties up names that could
be, should be reused to better effect.
There are probably extremely few instances where a name would rationa
On 5/20/2025 4:15 PM, Terje J. Hanssen wrote:
And yes, I agree. I didn't tell that I actually have a legacy pretty
good TBC (built in a Videonics MX-1 videomixer)
That's really a consumer product, not a professional one (and not
broadcast quality). If you can get your hands on one, look for
D
On 5/19/2025 5:45 AM, Terje J. Hanssen wrote:
Now I am testing another backup method with purpose of best practical
video quality using ffmpeg to encode lossless compressed FFV1.mkv files:
Analog video camera/player --> S-video/HDMI converter --> HDMI/USB3
capture card --> v4l2 --> ffmpeg
On 5/15/2025 1:33 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
What if I don't have a GPU?
Then you have a 25+ year old video card? AFAIK all video chips for the
last few decades have had some form of GPU, although it may not be that
useful or not accessible for offload processing.
A better question might be "W
On 5/14/2025 11:31 AM, Edit 'B wrote:
The resolution is there, but the sides are supposed to be invisible.
The aperture to be shown should be even smaller.
(SD was an overscanned format. In the full frame you should often see the tip
of a boom mic, that is ‘as close as possible, without being in
Hello,
On 5/14/2025 7:45 AM, ron wrote:
The reason is that this second audio is not being used and removing it
from the TS will give us a bit more BW for the Video.
What's the actual bandwidth of that stream? If it's silent or low
bit-rate, the overhead and added complexity of removing the st
On 4/18/2025 6:07 AM, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
[mxg @ 0x562ffddf1540] Stream #0: not enough frames to estimate rate;
consider increasing probesize
Did you try that? probesize (in bytes) is usually a much larger number.
(When including command output, please don't use -hide_banner or trim
On 3/17/2025 2:08 PM, Steven Kan wrote:
I am still looking to replace the camera, but while I'm looking, is
there a way to modify my processing chain so that, when the RTSP
video stutters, the audio does _not_ pause?
This is a WAG :)
Since the outgoing stream needs constant video frames to clo
On 2/24/2025 6:02 PM, BloodMan wrote:
I tested many ffmpeg commands and tricks and nothing :/
And yet you haven't included any of them with the question, nor the full
output of them.
Later,
z!
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
h
On 1/31/2025 2:30 AM, KoSza wrote:
Have somedoby seen my naswer from yesterday? I am afraid not every answer
is delivered...
If you posted the command output/etc that Moritz asked for, it did not
get to the list. And do not post screenshots, cut/paste the command
output from the command windo
On 1/28/2025 11:48 PM, Avitrr Aparnesh via ffmpeg-user wrote:
We would greatly appreciate it if you could provide information on the
following:
Have you read https://www.ffmpeg.org/legal.html ? That should answer
many of the questions.
In general, if you do not _distribute_ code based on f
On 1/28/2025 8:18 AM, MrNice wrote:
have an audio file, with MediaInfo I get
Audio
Channel layout : L R Ls Rs
> ffmpeg -v error -layouts | awk '/quad /{print $2}'
FL+FR+BL+BR
What is the correct answer?
Both.
Left, assumed to be front (L) = Front Left (FL)
Left
On 1/24/2025 11:00 PM, Ramesh Kumar wrote:
Can anybody share the flow with commands?
It's entirely possible that nobody on this list knows or is willing to
share, asking repeatedly won't change that. If you have tried various
approaches that didn't work, tell us what those are and how they di
On 1/12/2025 6:28 PM, arthurpeabody wrote:
There is no banner and stream.
Hmm, the originally-posted command
ffmpeg -i
https://playerservices.streamtheworld.com/api/livestream-redirect/KUNMFM_32.mp3
-t 180 -reconnect true -reconnect_streamed true
-reconnect_on_network_error true -timelimit
On 1/12/2025 11:27 AM, arthurpeabody wrote:
There was nothing until I terminated the processes with kill:
That's missing the entire banner and stream info - "Always show your
actual, unscripted ffmpeg command and the complete, uncut console output
from your command." (the first point in faq s
On 1/12/2025 9:50 AM, dude bro wrote:
The ffplay version I am using is 4.2.4.
First, that's -quite- old, please try with a newer version.
Second, please read the list FAQ
(https://www.ffmpeg.org/mailing-list-faq.html) section 6 and follow the
guidance there; that will help with getting a res
On 1/12/2025 7:28 AM, arthurpeabody wrote:
I capture live streams.
Please always include not only the complete command but the command
output, it often contains quite useful info for debugging (see section 6
of https://www.ffmpeg.org/mailing-list-faq.html).
z!
(reply to the list, not to the person unless requested)
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFMPEG SLOW (new versions)
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 20:53:27 +0100
From: Giovanni Fast1
To: Carl Zwanzig
Dear mr. Carl,
the ffmpeg exe that is fast is the following
ffmpeg
On 1/9/2025 11:22 AM, Giovanni Fast1 wrote:
The ffmpeg.exe I use is an executable of 108.45 GB, filedate 25 Oct
2021, ant it does the job at 65-70 frames per second, pretty fast.
But if I replace the ffmpeg.exe file with a more recent one, including
the one released a few days ago (137.53 MB,
On 1/9/2025 3:34 AM, Gennaro Esposito wrote:
My company has a video wall whose decoder is essentially designed
only for cameras, so the only devices it can view, via IP, are those
with "protocols" like RTSP or Onvif. It also has 4 HMDI/DVI ports to
view any "normal" graphic output
The protocols
On 1/6/2025 10:16 AM, arthurpeabody wrote:
Yes. I get updates for all my packages daily.
For completeness, what version do you have? Just running ffmpeg provides
very useful info (and should always be included when asking questions):
This is a very old build
$ /c/bin/ffmpeg-6.1.1-full_
On 1/5/2025 6:49 AM, Mikhail Morfikov wrote:
There's an IP camera, and I can connect to its RTSP stream using the
following address:
Out of curiosity, have you tried RTMP instead to see if it behaves
differently?
(In general, I expect there is better software for this use case than
ffmpeg s
On 1/6/2025 7:17 AM, arthurpeabody wrote:
Your ffmpeg has switches mine doesn't.
Are you running the latest? (7.1 was released 4 months ago, and it
continually evolves)
z!
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mail
On 12/19/2024 6:18 PM, David Niklas via ffmpeg-user wrote:
I don't know what to put into the arch argument to configure. I thought,
znver2 would be sufficient. But I just get "warning unknown architecture
znver2" Is znver2 not supported or am I missing something?
What is znver2?
The architectu
On 12/19/2024 8:18 PM, Josh Mulligan wrote:
hi hello i am sorry for your troubles i am not a ffmpreg worker i use it to
eddit my animations and file and save them properly i understand that this
can be complicated but can i ask how did u get my email because i keep
getting messages like this and
Please do not top-post on this list.
On 11/8/2024 3:46 PM, Jim Ruxton wrote:
Thanks so much for the help. Not sure why but when I try to upgrade ffmpeg
using the ppa as you suggested I get:
ffmpeg is already the newest version (7:4.4.2-0ubuntu0.22.04.1+esm5).
however if I check with "ffmpeg -v
On 10/15/2024 4:42 AM, tarun singhal wrote:
What happens is often while vmaf is about to finish someone merges code and
it kills the old pod in which case I end up restarting the entire process
again.
Is there a way in ffmpeg world where I can keep a track of how much vmaf is
done and resume fro
On 9/10/2024 1:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
What exactly in "nonfree" is not clear?
...most of it unless you dive into the various licensing pages and
divine the meaning _in context_ of "non-free".
Or, it was a reasonable question for the OP to ask.
For the OP-
There are a lot of "it depend
On 7/17/2024 12:43 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
frame; some projectors would use a three-blade shutter to get
supposedly smoother-looking motion.
Actually, z!, a double or triple shutter doesn't improve motion. It
reduces/eliminates perceived flicker.
Please read that again, I did not say it "imp
On 7/17/2024 5:46 AM, Oliver Fromme wrote:
The typical cinema frame rate (23.976 fps) is the minimum that's
commonly accepted,
In a real film cinema it's an exact 24fps however the shutter is
quartered so there are two flashes per frame; some projectors would use
a three-blade shutter to get
On 7/9/2024 3:53 AM, Rui Gabriel Nunes via ffmpeg-user wrote:
For reference, this is the ffmpeg command we are using at the moment:
ffmpeg -probesize 5 -analyzeduration 5 -rtsp_transport tcp -i "rtsp://" -c:v copy -c:a aac
-hls_flags append_list+split_by_time+omit_endlist -hls_segment
On 7/3/2024 9:11 AM, Izhar Marinov wrote:
Has anyone had any experience with SDI output to Dektec device?
It seems to be working initially but the output delay to the SDI grows
by a few seconds per minute, eventually the circular buffer fills up.
I had a similar problem with BMD Decklink cards
On 6/29/2024 7:00 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
Everything is down to what your router does.
Which in the vast majority of small installations (e.g. homes) is _also_
working as a NAT device and performs some filtering and basic firewall
functions. Or, at least I hope the device you have does, it's ha
On 6/29/2024 5:37 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
The firewall is between them and the OS networking.
The firewall is between your ISP's terminal device and your PC's network
interface, and it's probably also performing routing and NAT; many
people call it just a router, but it's also performing othe
Mark Filipak wrote in various messages:
Open ports shine on the Internet like stars in the
sky. Open ports want to be found.
How does the world see those ports _inside_ your firewall? Please
explain. (You do have an Internet firewall, don't you? Which one?)
Blackmagic was created to comp
On 6/29/2024 12:56 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
I did. That's why I decided not to use it.
Your loss.
z!
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpe
On 6/29/2024 12:46 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
I have no respect to anything called 'Blackmagic'.
That's fine, but then it appears that you're not familiar with the video
production industry - BMD products are all over. Perhaps you also can't
respect anything from "Grass Valley" or "Decimator", o
On 6/28/2024 4:07 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
I have to consider Blackmagic DaVinci Resolve to be a virus hub that is
probably selling access to my system through those ports to outside clients.
You're welcome to consider it such, but that doesn't make it so.
BMD is a rather old and respected com
On 6/27/2024 4:21 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
Difference between I-frame and key frame is so subtle that is not relevant
for your project.
What are they? They may be relevant to another project.
z!
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
ht
On 6/25/2024 11:20 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
What are you arguing about, z!?
Do you not believe that VLC plays Track_11055.m2ts?
Sigh, read it again. You asserted without foundation that VLC does "do
not depend on ffmpeg" and I pointed out that it does. Nothing more,
nothing less.
You also as
On 6/25/2024 10:39 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
VLC and PowerDVD.
VLC? Right in their credits they list ffmpeg (along with many other OS
projects).
It's at the top of the trac page, in the "Summary of
the bug". Do you see it, z!?
Did you put it in the email that I was quoting? No. In the trac
On 6/25/2024 9:53 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 25/06/2024 12.28, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 6/25/2024 8:51 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/11055#comment:173
Ticket_11055.m2ts plays correctly and completely by two players
that do not depend on FFmpeg.
Which ones? That&#
On 6/25/2024 8:51 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/11055#comment:173
Ticket_11055.m2ts plays correctly and completely by two players that
do not depend on FFmpeg.
Which ones? That's part of traceability (and proper bug reporting).
When are we going to get on with
On 6/19/2024 11:19 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
From the sound of it, this _is_ a normal/medium (or even "low")
severity bug in that it doesn't affect the vast majority of ffmpeg use.
How do you know that, Carl?
Address me as I sign my email and no other way; that's why it's there.
How to I kno
On 6/19/2024 9:51 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
Thank you for the 'guide' but neither 'important' nor 'normal' are in
that guide.
The interpolate using normal English!
I can only say that if you take all the timestamp bug reports (which may
all be from the same cause) and total them together, it's
On 6/19/2024 6:22 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
MasterQuestionable has downgraded the timestamp bug from 'important' to
'normal'.
Yes, and???
From the sound of it, this _is_ a normal/medium (or even "low")
severity bug in that it doesn't affect the vast majority of ffmpeg use.
There is often a giv
On 6/16/2024 7:02 AM, Bouke / edit 'B wrote:
You are feeding a thread that should not exist, so you, z!, are also feeding
trolls.
A thread that -I- created for a real problem, along with a reason why
isn't a problam and with a solution. Deal with it.
Stop, just stop.
Please do.
And st
On 6/16/2024 6:54 AM, Phil Rhodes via ffmpeg-user wrote:
Isn't that a statement which fundamentally undermines the entire concept
of ffmpeg as an open source project with willing developers...
More than a few OS projects have professional (and paid, they're not the
same thing) developers. No
On 6/16/2024 6:58 AM, Bouke / edit 'B wrote:
Do not feed trolls.
How is calling out the use of top posting "feeding the trolls"?
(It isn't.)
z!
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
On 6/16/2024 2:33 AM, Binarus wrote:
to solve your problem.
... for the same reasons that annoy you
However, your behavior ... Do you really
...to communicate with you
I strongly advise you to
- You do not have
etc
We only find out who "you" might be until we read down throu
On 6/15/2024 1:30 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
What you even mean with above unclear statements?
Perhaps you might read the last 8-10 messages as Jim attempts to
decipher it.
z!
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mai
On 6/14/2024 5:31 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
You see. This is the type of discussion that needs to occur _before_ a
bug report is filed.
Respectfully, no. Unless you had filed the bug, we wouldn't be having it
now.
Perhaps it would have been better if you had read the filing guidelines
and lea
On 6/12/2024 2:44 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
I need someone more knowledgeable about FFmpeg to triage.
They're often called 'developers'.
For example,
Perhaps the sequence header has some information that conflicts with my
cuts (the way cutting out a lone open B-frame turns an ending open GOP
I might be confused here, but...
On 6/12/2024 11:15 AM, Vlad Negru via ffmpeg-user wrote:
ffmpeg -i Input.webm -c:a copy Output.opus
> Stream mapping:
> Stream #0:0 -> #0:0 (copy)
On 6/12/2024 11:57 AM, Ferdi Scholten wrote:
You need to have a version of the opus encoder that is specifical
On 6/12/2024 11:35 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
If no one corroborates my findings, I can't proceed with a bug report.
Why not? Nothing about that in https://ffmpeg.org/bugreports.html.
Usually one person files the bug report then interested parties try to
reproduce as a path to fixing it; or they
On 6/8/2024 5:46 PM, Media Mouth wrote:
ffmpeg version 3.1.11 Copyright (c) 2000-2017 the FFmpeg developers
First thing is to get a modern version of ffmpeg, that one is positively
_ancient_.
(And also not to top-post on this mailing list.)
Later
z!
___
Hi,
On 5/22/2024 11:16 AM, Lisa wrote:
ffmpeg version 4.0.6 Copyright (c) 2000-2020 the FFmpeg developers
First thing is to try a modern version of ffmpeg, that one is positively
ancient and pretty much unsupported.
Later,
z!
___
ffmpeg-user mai
On 5/22/2024 5:09 AM, Nikhil via ffmpeg-user wrote:
i have updated from 4.x to 5.0 here is the output requested
Save some hassle and get a 7.x version. (Or at least 6.x.)
z!
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mail
Please post the complete command output with all the options and error
messages, otherwise it's only guessing (see section 6 of
https://ffmpeg.org//mailing-list-faq.html).
z!
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailm
On 5/1/2024 7:55 PM, CMG DiGiTaL wrote:
How do I generate the log, but keep the conversion information on the
screen as well?
(really a windoze question, not ffmpeg)
cmd.exe doesn't have an equivalent of the unix 'tee' command, but
powershell does--
PS C:\Users\cpz> echo "asdsasad" |tee as
On 4/5/2024 11:24 AM, Odessa TV wrote:
But it is not text, it is pictures, Can I paste pictures to the body
of the email?
We don't know that it's pictures without a description of them (missing)
and often people include screenshots of the command output instead of
the text (also missing).
On 4/4/2024 12:17 PM, Odessa TV wrote:
Link to screenshots:
Please just copy/paste the text into an email. It usually takes up less
space and is searchable.
z!
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo
On 3/23/2024 11:06 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
loudnorm is low quality filter, do not use it.
What do you suggest instead?
z!
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link
On 2/29/2024 3:43 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
Well, the attachment, which was only 50kB, got stripped off. I'm trying again.
Probably because it's HTML. Just drop the text in the email or include a
link to the page.
z!
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmp
On 2/29/2024 8:09 AM, Hervé ANSELME wrote:
Is this because my command line is missing some parameters, and if so, which
ones ?
Hard to tell because you haven't included the _complete_ command line.
Don't hesitate to let me know if you need any further technical
information ; thank you in ad
On 2/27/2024 10:55 AM, Herv� ANSELME wrote:
and here are the technical infos, displayed by the program, in the DOS window :
Please just cut/paste the output into the email, no images, no attachments
(also read the mailing list FAQ https://ffmpeg.org/mailing-list-faq.html).
z!
On 2/24/2024 9:16 AM, CMG DiGiTaL wrote:
[NULL @ 02738af86200] Unable to find a suitable output format for
'file=log.txt:level=16'
file=log.txt:level=16: Invalid argument
"log.txt:level=16" is not a valid filename here (you're on windoze, I
assume), you may need to escape the colon or
On 2/22/2024 12:11 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
Then the tee muxer is not suited to your needs.
To expand on that
21.53- "[Tee] is different from specifying several outputs to the ffmpeg
command-line tool. With the tee muxer, the audio and video data will be
encoded only once."
You need to use
On 2/13/2024 8:37 AM, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
"read time"
reaL time
z!
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpe
1 - 100 of 780 matches
Mail list logo
