On 5/28/2025 2:37 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
There are probably extremely few instances where a name would
rationally
be reused;
Name even a single such instance, Carl. Name reuse to a better filter
could be covered by the
documentation.
Your mission is failed.
My challenge was to Carl.
Nope, it's your assertion (to reuse), you defend it. Experience tells us
that name reuse for different functionality does not end well.
As for "it ought to be documented", then get with it; ffmpeg is open
source- you can download the source, make patches, and see if they're
accepted. Do not ask me, or anyone else really, to do it for you. (And
please don't bother with the "I'm not a programmer" or similar stuff, if
you can get that far down into the weeds of video formats, a 'git clone'
+ edit + test + 'git send-email' (see
https://www.ffmpeg.org/developer.html#toc-Submitting-patches-1)
shouldn't be that difficult.
Later,
z!
(who doesn't answer to 'carl', so stop using it)
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
