hread.c
> index 2654b40058..8777d380bf 100644
> --- a/libavcodec/vvc/thread.c
> +++ b/libavcodec/vvc/thread.c
> @@ -293,10 +293,14 @@ static void schedule_inter(VVCContext *s,
> VVCFrameContext *fc, const SliceContex
> CTU *ctu = fc->tab.ctus + rs;
> for (int lx = 0; lx < 2; lx++) {
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
https://jbkempf.com/
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg
_name(xmlNodePtr parent, const char
> *name_utf8);
> +
> +/**
> + * Parse a ASSETMAP XML file to extract the UUID-URI mapping of assets.
> + * @param s the current format context, if any (can be NULL).
> + * @param doc the XML documen
till think so. ( :D )
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmp
.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
>
> Attachments:
> * signature.asc
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
5.x.x
version until the next major.
jb
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-deve
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021, at 15:23, James Almer wrote:
> On 10/7/2021 10:07 AM, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Wed, 6 Oct 2021, at 11:35, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> I do plan to make releases from
>>> 4.4, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0, 3.4, 3.2, 2.8 branch
allows to support oneVPL (mfx 2.0) if people want.
As long as this is a user choice, I don't see why this shouldn't be merged;
knowing also that upstream tells us that they only support 2.0, with less
features.
(This is the issue always with upgrades of external libraries, even worse when
On Wed, 20 Oct 2021, at 01:00, Soft Works wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of
>> Jean-Baptiste Kempf
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 11:19 PM
>> To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
>> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v6 00/10
vote rights but add active developers each
> jan/july
>
> Is a more honest choice for the "opposition" than "never update"
That's an extra choice, in my opinion, and we could also have it, but it's a
bit annoying that you say it now.
But it's doable.
Be
On Tue, 10 Oct 2023, at 14:42, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
>> There was no real prior discussion on the mailing list about this.
>
http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2023-September/314772.html
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 67
explain many times why the opportunity has passed for 6.1, but you,
once again, don't listen, or refuse to be on the means where we discuss.
Again, a personal attack, from you.
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel maili
anything and is not an
> argument.
Refusing to attend the developer meetups and also refusing to be on one of the
major discussion media and then complaining about not receiving information is
a problem in an open source community.
jb
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - Pre
On Sun, 29 Oct 2023, at 15:17, Nicolas George wrote:
> Jean-Baptiste Kempf (12023-10-29):
>> > Unsubstantiated opinion, let us ignore it.
>> Again, a personal attack, from you.
>
> YOU are not an OPINION, so, no, this is not a personal attack,
Because instead of doing the
not enough new things to cut a
release.
So I'm not against a release for 6.1 at all, but I believe focusing on minor
releases for security and on 7.0 with the next major deprecations is more
important.
If we can do all of those, and keep more or less the timing for 7.0, please be
my guest
On Sun, 29 Oct 2023, at 17:40, Nicolas George wrote:
> Jean-Baptiste Kempf (12023-10-29):
>> Because instead of doing the polite and normal thing which would be:
>
> Politeness or not does not make it a personal attack. Moving goalposts
> much?
Being not polite to someone is
On Sun, 29 Oct 2023, at 17:49, James Almer wrote:
> On 10/29/2023 1:42 PM, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Sat, 28 Oct 2023, at 18:49, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> noone mentioned 5.1.x and 6.0.x to me before
>>
>> Our last releases from
nd a longer email to explain.
> cannot blame anyone for not following live discussion like VDD or IRC.
Sorry, I can. Being on IRC is necessary, IMHO.
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ff
On Sun, 29 Oct 2023, at 19:12, Nicolas George wrote:
> Jean-Baptiste Kempf (12023-10-29):
>> Sorry, I can. Being on IRC is necessary, IMHO.
>
> Completely unacceptable and fortunately not true at all.
We'll have to agree to disagree.
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - Presi
On Sun, 29 Oct 2023, at 19:31, Nicolas George wrote:
> Jean-Baptiste Kempf (12023-10-29):
>> We'll have to agree to disagree.
>
> So you disagree that ffmpeg is not a corporate project where developers
> can be forced to have fixed work hours. Interesting.
IRC has logs
On Sun, 29 Oct 2023, at 19:46, Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
> Am 29.10.23 um 18:56 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Kempf:
>> On Sun, 29 Oct 2023, at 18:20, Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
>>> In this case as well, I think you
>>> should have transported your reaso
scribe".
>
> Attachments:
> * 0002-aacdec-correctly-skip-padding-at-the-start-of-frames.patch
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-
go with the above for the
> actual vote tomorrow.
This has been launched.
You should be able to vote until Sunday 5th Nov, 23:59
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023, at 11:33, Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
> Am 30.10.23 um 09:18 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Kempf:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Sun, 29 Oct 2023, at 10:33, Anton Khirnov wrote:
>>> vote question (unchanged):
>>> How do we update the list of
ists (+ the scripts) only give emails, and not names.
So I'll need to remap that manually to have the list of names. It will take a
bit of time, but I'll do it.
jb
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mail
g will it take you ?
Sorry, I got quite sick, like many people who came from Demuxed.
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscri
tion for the voting system I could also add some switches to the
> script to print only names, only emails or name and email for example.
That would be helpful, tbh.
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
aken, with a bi-annual update.
Patches for the documentation are welcome.
Best,
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - Vice
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit
Hello,
On Mon, 6 Nov 2023, at 16:56, Alexander Strasser wrote:
> Hi all,
> hi J-B!
>
> On 2023-11-06 07:10 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
>> Yo,
>>
>> Time is up, results are here:
>> https://vote.ffmpeg.org/cgi-bin/civs/results.pl?id=E_029f7195fed7aadf
>
{ "0", "1", "2" } },
> +{ AV_HWDEVICE_TYPE_D3D12VA,
> + { "0", "1", "2" } },
> { AV_HWDEVICE_TYPE_OPENCL,
> { "0.0", "0.1", "1.0&q
anymore.
Best,
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with
his is not acceptable for a vote.
How so? Do you go to and see the list of all the voters in Austria before doing
a vote ?
Especially, here, it is to bootstrap a new way of voting.
If the vote was close, maybe there could be discussion, but here, this is not
the case.
And stop smearing
and now the new list was written by Anton
with the new script.
Whatever the old script was, and how wrong it was, I don't think it would
change the result of the re-bootstrapping vote.
And now we have a clean list for the extra members of the GA.
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672
ld step forward and say so publicly that they are candidates.
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023, at 23:49, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 08:30:15PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 9 Nov 2023, at 19:15, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 07:53:33PM +0200, Rémi Denis-Courmo
an being, who understand his limitations.
People have asked for people becoming candidates to post publicly on this
mailing list, I don't see what the big deal in that.
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffm
Private Information, according to a GDPR and that you are a process of this
PI, and therefore liable to the law.
However, neither YOU nor the legal owner FFmpeg.org explain how you will retain
this information, process it further, OR, as the most important part,
mx.at
>> i could vote twice.
>
> I am confused: you would get the same token in the second mail, you
> would not be able to use it twice.
Nicolas is very correct here: in some of the test voting, some people got the
email twice, and could vote only once.
TBH, all e-voting syste
documented official limit?
jb
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmp
$subject
See attachment.
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734From 13eb5105ff6fe664d4a45da6970875ceb763dfe0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jean-Baptiste Kempf
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 10:56:55 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] doc: mention that for RISC-V, we prefer .S files
---
doc
mail
> ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
>
> Attachments:
> * 0001-MAINTAINERS-remove-myself-from-FFmpeg.patch
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.
On Thu, 7 Dec 2023, at 09:59, Nicolas George wrote:
> Jean-Baptiste Kempf (12023-12-07):
>> Why?
>
> Because after twelve years libav has finally managed to take control and
> FFmpeg is now essentially dead.
You are delusional. libav is dead since a long time.
The fact that
On Thu, 7 Dec 2023, at 10:10, Nicolas George wrote:
> Jean-Baptiste Kempf (12023-12-07):
>> You are delusional.
>
> Oh, this is absolutely appropriate, especially from somebody who just
> got elected to apply the code of conduct.
Keep antagonizing more people in the community,
On Thu, 7 Dec 2023, at 10:14, Nicolas George wrote:
> The community is dead. And you never belonged to it anyway, with your
> superior attitude.
You calling someone "superior attitude" is amazing.
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
gram A that includes library B, which itself would include C.
> So yes, your interpretation looks correct to me (IANAL).
I got bitten by it, in the past, that's why I now know.
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-dev
ve ever seen that done however
Google release of Sparrow on iOS is a clear case of this: to allow effective
changing of the LGPL library in it, they gave all the objects pre-linking. So
you could recompile the LGPL library part completely, and relink and reship on
your device.
--
Jean-Baptiste Kemp
0 Google Search result?
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg
.
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
has a EULA), I would
suggest a vote only on this part.
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
On Sun, 28 Apr 2019, at 22:02, Marton Balint wrote:
> 2) Should patches using closed source libraries which are not considered
> "System Libraries" according to the GPL be rejected?
You mean "major components"?
(at no point does the GPLv2 mention "System Libra
GPLv3 did not help on that part,
and makes it more confusing (and many other parts).
My understanding of major components of the OS, in GPLv2sense, is
kernel+libc+compiler+init/shell+drivers+libraries-installed-with-the-previous.
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
__
looked at it closely.
Because of [1], people looked at [2] and realized that this was not OK, and
different from the rest of the FFmpeg project, especially since we refused
librmhd and other closed-source libraries.
So please don't make it a vote about [1], when it is a vote about [2].
--
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019, at 07:51, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> Where does this license come from?
Original file.
Very classical BSD-3
> Is that even GPL-compatible?
Yes, of course.
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg
pposed to go through all files one by one and check the
> license and copy the license text?
> Should we not at very least provide and maintain a correct "list of
> licenses" file?
Well, yes/no. In practice many overlap.
--
Jean-Baptiste Kem
repos
without asking anyone.
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.or
es.
Gitlab on videolan is the open source version, since we only rely on open
source software for the whole infrastructure,
and you can use gitlab in CLI, and/or disable MR if you want (basically using
it like a dumb git repo, if you want).
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
d, then we won't get anything done.
If you know how to fix those things in a proper way, please tell us. I am sure
we could even sponsor you for doing this work.
Best,
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019, at 09:57, Rodger Combs wrote:
> This avoids using the CUDA SDK at all; instead, we provide a minimal
> reimplementation of the basic functionality that lavfi actually uses.
> It generates very similar code to what NVCC produces.
Very very cool.
--
Jean-Bapti
___
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf
> > ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
> >
> > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
> ___
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019, at 11:48, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> When and how to organize this?
You have the choice:
- IBC
- GSoC summit
- VDD
Best,
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
ht
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019, at 09:45, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 8:17 AM Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
>
> > You need to explain why. A "NAK" is not enough.
> >
> > 16k pixels x 16k is a large size already for vc1.
> >
>
> And for any o
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019, at 11:02, Tomas Härdin wrote:
> mån 2019-08-19 klockan 08:17 +0200 skrev Jean-Baptiste Kempf:
> > You need to explain why. A "NAK" is not enough.
> >
> > 16k pixels x 16k is a large size already for vc1.
>
> Why not fix the ca
ee it is difficult to "make sense" in an answer to
> > something that makes no sense.
>
> Please consult doctors.
Those kind of remarks are not OK.
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing li
decided to move it into a separate library, but its not like they actually
> asked for arguments.
Arguments have been asked to numerous people, who just might have a different
opinion that yours.
Also, it was not 'moved' to a separate library, but created elsewhere.
--
Jean-Baptis
On Sat, 29 Sep 2018, at 17:32, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 4:37 PM Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 29 Sep 2018, at 15:14, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> > > I'm still a bit annoyed that this wasn't even a consideration when it was
t contributes .Net as MIT, Google and Microsoft work together on
numerous frameworks, most go, js, python projects are licensed under MIT/BSD,
and they still have thousand of contributors, not people forking all the time.
The reason is because the money is on services, not just software.
x27;s weekly
> temporary bannings I've heard of).
We banned 2 times 1 person from IRC 24hours, and banned someone once from the
mailing-list, in the many years (7?) that our CoC existed. Please don't spread
misinformation.
I don't see how that is abusing or overusing...
--
Jean-B
FFmpeg license and the GPL.
Best,
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
rivers, are usually considered part of the
OS. This is a bit weird, but this extend the Linux way to other (broken) OSes.
That would make nvenc and such acceptable.
NDI is not hardware. (Nor is faac)
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
__
> Again: What message would this send to future license violators?
A bad one.
I would remove this.
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffm
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018, at 23:14, Marton Balint wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Dec 2018, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Dec 2018, at 19:48, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > Libraries to access hardware, notably those that are talking directly with
> > something that was shipped with the
it is useful to someone.
Including shims for Adobe, Dolby and others.
And what is the incentive to do open source alternatives?
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
rything under the world,
starting with librv11, and Eve and so on.
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
use cases to do it?"
I remember that last year, there was an extractqp for h264 patches from Google,
for example.
Any other question is basically less important.
If that is useful, then, we should update the API and remove the old API.
If it is not, then, let's remove everything.
Be
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020, at 15:46, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 2/26/20, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> > Yo,
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020, at 14:27, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
> >> > The patch in your link is not using this API. Precisely because this API
> >> > is
The question remains if any of the people arguing
> for keeping those filters are also willing to do the conversion.
Lynne? Juan? Can it be done with the new API patches?
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing
> for keeping those filters are also willing to do the conversion.
>
> I am willing to help, the time ATM is not great though because theres
Thanks.
I think the next major API bump is months away, so I'm not sure there is any
urgency here :)
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 67
for them and not found.
Separating I/O from demuxers would bring a lot of interesting things for
security and for custom protocols.
But I agree on subtitles decoders, which is the topic here.
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
're replacing with democracy and voting.
> I do not want to be part of such community any more.
Blackmails of type "if you don't do as I want, I will leave" have been tested
since a long time on numerous OSS projects and here, and it never works.
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf -
int8_t el_present_flag;
> +uint8_t bl_present_flag;
> +uint8_t dv_bl_signal_compatibility_id;
> +} AVDOVIDecoderConfigurationRecord;
> +
> +#endif /* AVUTIL_DOLBY_VISION_META_H */
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> ___
> ffmpeg-devel m
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020, at 03:22, myp...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 10:18 PM Jean-Baptiste Kempf
> wrote:
> >
> > I really do not think it is a good idea to have a header with the name
> > dolby in it.
> >
> Can you give some details, I don
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020, at 15:00, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> You are very ignorant or very stupid or both.
Whatever the technical merit, please do not insult people.
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffm
> > gstreamer" is not really helpful for us either...)
>
> You must know that out of tree filters will never be supported.
Why?
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https:/
, (and same for audio), should be nice
to have.
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
uint8_t dv_bl_signal_compatibility_id;
> +} AVDOVIDecoderConfigurationRecord;
> +
> +#endif /* AVUTIL_DOVI_META_H */
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> ___
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/lis
>>>> >>> + }
> >>>> >>> +
> >>>> >>> +av_bprintf(&sdp, "m=%s %d RTP/AVP %d\r\n",
> >>>> >>> + par->codec_type == AVMEDIA_TYPE_DATA ?
> >>>> >>
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020, at 16:28, Ross Nicholson wrote:
> How do you mean? What’s that problem?
You've used Ross Nicholson for committing, and now you
only use
phunkyfish .
Since you are not anonymous, why not use your actual name?
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672
---
doc/dev_community/resolution_process.md | 91 +
1 file changed, 91 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 doc/dev_community/resolution_process.md
diff --git a/doc/dev_community/resolution_process.md
b/doc/dev_community/resolution_process.md
new file mode 100644
index 0
---
doc/dev_community/resolution_process.md | 91 +
1 file changed, 91 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 doc/dev_community/resolution_process.md
diff --git a/doc/dev_community/resolution_process.md
b/doc/dev_community/resolution_process.md
new file mode 100644
index 0
ickly.
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
your
> > commit made it consistently wrong. This shows up in my tests and is also
>
> You are mistaken. It fixed race. Prove it does not.
> Another patch is supposed to fix output for both single and multi threads.
Which patch fixes everything?
--
Jean-Bapti
Hello,
If you are a voter part of the FFmpeg General Assembly, you should have
received an email to allow you to vote on this.
Best,
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021, at 11:46, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> ---
> doc/dev_community/resolution_process.md | 91 +
> 1 file ch
On Mon, 1 Mar 2021, at 15:48, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> What is ranked choice voting?
https://ballotpedia.org/Ranked-choice_voting_(RCV)
For a binary vote, though, the interest is limited :)
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffm
agenda topic, if you want/can.
Best,
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ
Hello,
This is a reminder about the vote. This is closing soon, and most of you have
not voted yet!
Best,
On Mon, 1 Mar 2021, at 15:29, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If you are a voter part of the FFmpeg General Assembly, you should have
> received an email to allow yo
://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2021-February/276046.html
Best,
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link
---
doc/dev_community/community.md | 2 +-
doc/dev_community/resolution_process.md | 91 +
2 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 doc/dev_community/resolution_process.md
diff --git a/doc/dev_community/community.md b/doc/dev_community
What is the hardware supported?
Does it work for rPI?
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President
+33 672 704 734
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or ema
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021, at 11:17, Steven Liu wrote:
> > 2021年3月12日 下午5:12，Jean-Baptiste Kempf 写道：
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, at 23:09, suji.velupil...@broadcom.com wrote:
> >> Initial commit to add VKAPI hardware accelerator implementation.
> >> The depeden
1 - 100 of 474 matches
Mail list logo
