Hello, On Tue, 10 Oct 2023, at 13:56, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > a vote on the General Assembly composition was apparently initiated with > a duration of 6 days, i saw this in my inbox: > "1009 23:49 Jean-Baptiste K (3,4K) Poll: FFmpeg AG members rules" > > There was no real prior discussion on the mailing list about this.
https://github.com/videolabs/libspatialaudio > There are 2 choices which are similar > (update the list before each vote and update it twice a year) > And a 3rd option that is probably not what the "opposition" wants I think > (use the 2020 version, never update) Those 3 were mentioned at VDD in the FFmpeg meeting you were in. It was also already discussed at FOSDEM this year and the previous, and people complained that I did not do that vote before. > First its neccessary to give the community a chance to discuss the GA > composition > choices, collect suggestions and then do a vote I think this was done. > Now iam quite unprepared to really suggest something as i also didnt > think about this > much or expect this vote now but at least something like > * keep everyone who had vote rights but add active developers each > jan/july > > Is a more honest choice for the "opposition" than "never update" That's an extra choice, in my opinion, and we could also have it, but it's a bit annoying that you say it now. But it's doable. Best, -- Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President +33 672 704 734 _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
