2016-10-18 13:11 GMT+02:00 Moritz Barsnick :
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 00:21:42 +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> In any case, your second patch is acceptable, should not have
>> any adversary effects and we have significantly worse cosmetic
>> patches in our tree, so it is ok imo.
>
> I only see o
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 23:23:31 +0200, Michael Behrisch wrote:
> My main reason is that we are compiling with different compilers for
> different platforms
If you're trying to keep ffmpeg more portable, you could at least try
the real-life thing and actually attempt to build with Sun Studio or
ne
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 00:21:42 +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> In any case, your second patch is acceptable, should not have
> any adversary effects and we have significantly worse cosmetic
> patches in our tree, so it is ok imo.
I only see one patch - did I miss one? - , and if that's the one
2016-10-18 0:17 GMT+02:00 Michael Behrisch :
> I am not claiming that -Wpedantic is the only way to achieve this.
> I only think it helps or at least I assume that was the intention
> when it was invented.
("If gcc does it this way, it must be a good idea.")
This is an extremely unconvincing arg
Hi Ronald,
Am 17.10.2016 um 23:45 schrieb Ronald S. Bultje:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Michael Behrisch wrote:
>
>> Hi Ronald,
>>
>> Am 17.10.2016 um 21:37 schrieb Ronald S. Bultje:
>>> Hi Michael,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Michael Behrisch
>>> wrote:
>>>
Hi Michael,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Michael Behrisch wrote:
> Hi Ronald,
>
> Am 17.10.2016 um 21:37 schrieb Ronald S. Bultje:
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Michael Behrisch
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Am 17.10.2016 um 15:29 schrieb Michael Niedermayer:
> >>> On Mon,
Hi Ronald,
Am 17.10.2016 um 21:37 schrieb Ronald S. Bultje:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Michael Behrisch
> wrote:
>
>> Am 17.10.2016 um 15:29 schrieb Michael Niedermayer:
>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 01:34:55PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 13:09:36 +0200 Mich
Hi Michael,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Michael Behrisch wrote:
> Am 17.10.2016 um 15:29 schrieb Michael Niedermayer:
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 01:34:55PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
> >> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 13:09:36 +0200
> >> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:07:42
Am 17.10.2016 um 15:29 schrieb Michael Niedermayer:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 01:34:55PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
>> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 13:09:36 +0200
>> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:07:42AM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
Le sextidi 26 vendémiaire, an CCXXV, Michael Ni
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 01:34:55PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 13:09:36 +0200
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:07:42AM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> > > Le sextidi 26 vendémiaire, an CCXXV, Michael Niedermayer a écrit :
> > > > probably, yes
> > >
>
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 13:09:36 +0200
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:07:42AM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> > Le sextidi 26 vendémiaire, an CCXXV, Michael Niedermayer a écrit :
> > > probably, yes
> >
> > I would have said exactly the opposite. It is nothing but a waste
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:11:08AM +0200, Michael Behrisch wrote:
> Am 16.10.2016 um 23:24 schrieb Clément Bœsch:
> > On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 09:46:20PM +0200, Michael Behrisch wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >> first of all thanks for providing this great library.
> >>
> >> Today my pull request https://git
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:07:42AM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le sextidi 26 vendémiaire, an CCXXV, Michael Niedermayer a écrit :
> > probably, yes
>
> I would have said exactly the opposite. It is nothing but a waste of time
> and a pollution of the history.
My idea here is to maximize the nu
Le sextidi 26 vendémiaire, an CCXXV, Michael Niedermayer a écrit :
> probably, yes
I would have said exactly the opposite. It is nothing but a waste of time
and a pollution of the history.
--
Nicolas George
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:11:08AM +0200, Michael Behrisch wrote:
> Am 16.10.2016 um 23:24 schrieb Clément Bœsch:
> > On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 09:46:20PM +0200, Michael Behrisch wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >> first of all thanks for providing this great library.
> >>
> >> Today my pull request https://git
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Michael Behrisch wrote:
> Am 16.10.2016 um 23:24 schrieb Clément Bœsch:
> > On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 09:46:20PM +0200, Michael Behrisch wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >> first of all thanks for providing this great library.
> >>
> >> Today my pull request https://githu
Am 16.10.2016 um 23:24 schrieb Clément Bœsch:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 09:46:20PM +0200, Michael Behrisch wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> first of all thanks for providing this great library.
>>
>> Today my pull request https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pull/237 has been
>> rejected which tried to remove the
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 09:46:20PM +0200, Michael Behrisch wrote:
> Hi all,
> first of all thanks for providing this great library.
>
> Today my pull request https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pull/237 has been
> rejected which tried to remove the comma at the end of enumerator lists
> which trigger
On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 21:51:32 +0200
Nicolas George wrote:
> Le quintidi 25 vendémiaire, an CCXXV, Michael Behrisch a écrit :
> > Today my pull request https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pull/237 has been
> > rejected which tried to remove the comma at the end of enumerator lists
> > which triggers a
Le quintidi 25 vendémiaire, an CCXXV, Michael Behrisch a écrit :
> Today my pull request https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pull/237 has been
> rejected which tried to remove the comma at the end of enumerator lists
> which triggers a warning when compiling with gcc and -Wpedantic. I still
> think it
20 matches
Mail list logo
