On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:07:42AM +0200, Nicolas George wrote: > Le sextidi 26 vendémiaire, an CCXXV, Michael Niedermayer a écrit : > > probably, yes > > I would have said exactly the opposite. It is nothing but a waste of time > and a pollution of the history.
My idea here is to maximize the number of developers
And if in cases where one doesnt really care much either way and
someone else seems caring more one says, "ok" that may result in a happy
new contributor.
Saying "no" is more likely to turn someone away.
and again, it doesnt really matter if the , is there after a
final sentinel /count entry as no next field would ever be added
And ATM the "," thing is not consistent either way
git grep '_NB$' |wc
53 114 2123
git grep '_NB,$' |wc
30 76 1499
Making this more consistent shouldnt be a bad thing if the people who
want it also do the work ... (and it doesnt end as some rule that
causes future work to people not caring ...)
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Why not whip the teacher when the pupil misbehaves? -- Diogenes of Sinope
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
