Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-25 Thread Amancio Hasty
On June 25, 2016 at 12:42:52 PM, Michael Niedermayer (mich...@niedermayer.cc) wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 07:21:15PM +0200, Jan Gerber wrote: > On 06/25/2016 06:50 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > >> git cherry-pick 1087f0dc172a9adf779e41bf2dc82639fb04ebd4 > > > > is this or 0c9c4004ed57de210b4

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-25 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 07:21:15PM +0200, Jan Gerber wrote: > On 06/25/2016 06:50 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > >> git cherry-pick 1087f0dc172a9adf779e41bf2dc82639fb04ebd4 > > > > is this or 0c9c4004ed57de210b4d83c7b39bbfb00b86b9af preferred ? > > both are ok, would use 0c9c4004ed57de210b4d83c

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-25 Thread Jan Gerber
On 06/25/2016 06:50 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >> git cherry-pick 1087f0dc172a9adf779e41bf2dc82639fb04ebd4 > > is this or 0c9c4004ed57de210b4d83c7b39bbfb00b86b9af preferred ? both are ok, would use 0c9c4004ed57de210b4d83c7b39bbfb00b86b9af to keep the delta to libav smaller. __

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-25 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:00:48PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi all > > what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ? > > I still have these ideas from past suggestions: > Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincaré, desitter, de broglie, Gauss, > Galois, Viterbi, Darwin > > Are there other suggesti

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-25 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 03:02:30PM +0200, Jan Gerber wrote: > On 06/25/2016 02:45 PM, Amancio Hasty wrote: > > Most cool. Can you post the exact command line that you used to > > test h264_omx? > > git remote add tmm1 https://github.com/tmm1/FFmpeg > git fetch tmmi1 > git checkout -b omx > git c

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-25 Thread Amancio Hasty
> On Jun 25, 2016, at 6:53 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Jan Gerber wrote: >> On 06/25/2016 02:45 PM, Amancio Hasty wrote: >>> Most cool. Can you post the exact command line that you used to >>> test h264_omx? >> >> git remote add tmm1 https://github.com/tmm1/

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-25 Thread Hendrik Leppkes
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Jan Gerber wrote: > On 06/25/2016 02:45 PM, Amancio Hasty wrote: >> Most cool. Can you post the exact command line that you used to >> test h264_omx? > > git remote add tmm1 https://github.com/tmm1/FFmpeg > git fetch tmmi1 > git checkout -b omx > git cherry-pick 2a

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-25 Thread Jan Gerber
On 06/25/2016 02:45 PM, Amancio Hasty wrote: > Most cool. Can you post the exact command line that you used to > test h264_omx? git remote add tmm1 https://github.com/tmm1/FFmpeg git fetch tmmi1 git checkout -b omx git cherry-pick 2a1fcc3775a390570679da7f507539a397fc7130 git cherry-pick 1087f0dc1

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-25 Thread Amancio Hasty
> On Jun 25, 2016, at 5:41 AM, Jan Gerber wrote: > > On 06/25/2016 11:17 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >>> where is that patch ? >>> i see >>> " --enable-omx-rpi enable encoding via OpenMAX IL for Raspberry Pi >>> [no]" >>> in ffmpeg git, what is missing? >> >> looking at tmm1/rebase-

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-25 Thread Jan Gerber
On 06/25/2016 11:17 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >> where is that patch ? >> i see >> " --enable-omx-rpi enable encoding via OpenMAX IL for Raspberry Pi >> [no]" >> in ffmpeg git, what is missing? > > looking at tmm1/rebase-omx i only see 2 one line patches that we > dont have yet > i c

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-25 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:03:27AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 09:54:54PM -0700, Amancio Hasty wrote: > > > > > On Jun 24, 2016, at 7:39 PM, Michael Niedermayer > > > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 06:52:01PM -0700, Amancio Hasty wrote: > > >> > > >>

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-25 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 09:54:54PM -0700, Amancio Hasty wrote: > > > On Jun 24, 2016, at 7:39 PM, Michael Niedermayer > > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 06:52:01PM -0700, Amancio Hasty wrote: > >> > >>> On Jun 24, 2016, at 6:31 PM, Michael Niedermayer > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Thu

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-24 Thread Amancio Hasty
> On Jun 24, 2016, at 7:39 PM, Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 06:52:01PM -0700, Amancio Hasty wrote: >> >>> On Jun 24, 2016, at 6:31 PM, Michael Niedermayer >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:00:48PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: Hi all >>

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-24 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:12:05PM -0300, James Almer wrote: > On 6/24/2016 10:31 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:00:48PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > >> Hi all > >> > >> what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ? > >> > >> I still have these ideas from past suggestions:

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-24 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 06:52:01PM -0700, Amancio Hasty wrote: > > > On Jun 24, 2016, at 6:31 PM, Michael Niedermayer > > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:00:48PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > >> Hi all > >> > >> what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ? > >> > >> I still have these id

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-24 Thread James Almer
On 6/24/2016 10:31 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:00:48PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >> Hi all >> >> what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ? >> >> I still have these ideas from past suggestions: >> Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincaré, desitter, de broglie, Gauss,

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-24 Thread Amancio Hasty
> On Jun 24, 2016, at 6:31 PM, Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:00:48PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >> Hi all >> >> what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ? >> >> I still have these ideas from past suggestions: >> Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincaré, desitter, d

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-24 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:00:48PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi all > > what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ? > > I still have these ideas from past suggestions: > Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincaré, desitter, de broglie, Gauss, > Galois, Viterbi, Darwin > > Are there other suggesti

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-24 Thread Kyle Swanson
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi all > > what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ? > > I still have these ideas from past suggestions: > Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincaré, desitter, de broglie, Gauss, > Galois, Viterbi, Darwin > > Are there other suggestions? > Is s

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-24 Thread Gregory J Wolfe
> From: ffmpeg-devel [mailto:ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org] On > Behalf Of Wang Bin > Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 10:02 PM > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name > > What about choosing a scientist who was born in FFmpeg release > month? Don't want it to loo

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-24 Thread Gregory J Wolfe
> -Original Message- > From: ffmpeg-devel [mailto:ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org] On > Behalf Of Michael Niedermayer > Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 5:01 PM > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches de...@ffmpeg.org> > Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-23 Thread compn
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 23:00:48 +0200 Michael Niedermayer wrote: > what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ? > Are there other suggestions? has fibonacci been used? -compn ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/f

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-23 Thread Wang Bin
What about choosing a scientist who was born in FFmpeg release month? ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-23 Thread Bodecs Bela
2016.06.23. 23:23 keltezéssel, Paul B Mahol írta: On 6/23/16, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: On 23 June 2016 at 22:00, Michael Niedermayer wrote: Hi all what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ? I still have these ideas from past suggestions: Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincare, desitter, de b

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-23 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 6/23/16, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > On 23 June 2016 at 22:00, Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ? >> >> I still have these ideas from past suggestions: >> Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincare, desitter, de broglie, Gauss, >> Galois, Viterbi,

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-23 Thread Rostislav Pehlivanov
On 23 June 2016 at 22:00, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi all > > what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ? > > I still have these ideas from past suggestions: > Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincaré, desitter, de broglie, Gauss, > Galois, Viterbi, Darwin > > Are there other suggestions? > Is somethin

[FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name

2016-06-23 Thread Michael Niedermayer
Hi all what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ? I still have these ideas from past suggestions: Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincaré, desitter, de broglie, Gauss, Galois, Viterbi, Darwin Are there other suggestions? Is something preferred ? In absence of any preferrance ill pick something randoml