> On Jun 24, 2016, at 6:31 PM, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> > wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:00:48PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >> Hi all >> >> what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ? >> >> I still have these ideas from past suggestions: >> Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincaré, desitter, de broglie, Gauss, >> Galois, Viterbi, Darwin >> >> Are there other suggestions? >> Is something preferred ? >> >> In absence of any preferrance ill pick something randomly > > Laplace (Rostislav, Bodecs) > Carl (Paul) > Lorentz (Bodecs) > fibonacci (Compn) > [list of people from june] (Gregory) > Hypatia (Kyle) > > Laplace got suggested twice, everything else once > Thus the winner is Laplace > > i intend to make the release tomorrow (saturday) from what is in git > master unless people want me to wait ? > > [...] > > -- > Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB > > Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little > temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety -- Benjamin Franklin > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
Can we till Aman finishes his omx/h264 encoding? Again lots of people in the RPI commute are waiting for this and it looks like the finishing touch does not required much work… Amancio _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
