On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:12:05PM -0300, James Almer wrote: > On 6/24/2016 10:31 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:00:48PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > >> Hi all > >> > >> what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ? > >> > >> I still have these ideas from past suggestions: > >> Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincaré, desitter, de broglie, Gauss, > >> Galois, Viterbi, Darwin > >> > >> Are there other suggestions? > >> Is something preferred ? > >> > >> In absence of any preferrance ill pick something randomly > > > > Laplace (Rostislav, Bodecs) > > Carl (Paul) > > Lorentz (Bodecs) > > fibonacci (Compn) > > [list of people from june] (Gregory) > > Hypatia (Kyle) > > > > Laplace got suggested twice, everything else once > > Thus the winner is Laplace > > > > i intend to make the release tomorrow (saturday) from what is in git > > master unless people want me to wait ? >
> Rodger Combs still hasn't pushed his auto-bsf patchset. > IMO at least a part of it should be applied for 3.1 to get rid of the > memleak. I agree, that shouldnt really cause any delay anyway ... can someone please apply what should be applied from it. thanks [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Awnsering whenever a program halts or runs forever is On a turing machine, in general impossible (turings halting problem). On any real computer, always possible as a real computer has a finite number of states N, and will either halt in less than N cycles or never halt.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
