On June 25, 2016 at 12:42:52 PM, Michael Niedermayer (mich...@niedermayer.cc)
wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 07:21:15PM +0200, Jan Gerber wrote:
> On 06/25/2016 06:50 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> git cherry-pick 1087f0dc172a9adf779e41bf2dc82639fb04ebd4
> >
> > is this or 0c9c4004ed57de210b4
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 07:21:15PM +0200, Jan Gerber wrote:
> On 06/25/2016 06:50 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> git cherry-pick 1087f0dc172a9adf779e41bf2dc82639fb04ebd4
> >
> > is this or 0c9c4004ed57de210b4d83c7b39bbfb00b86b9af preferred ?
>
> both are ok, would use 0c9c4004ed57de210b4d83c
On 06/25/2016 06:50 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> git cherry-pick 1087f0dc172a9adf779e41bf2dc82639fb04ebd4
>
> is this or 0c9c4004ed57de210b4d83c7b39bbfb00b86b9af preferred ?
both are ok, would use 0c9c4004ed57de210b4d83c7b39bbfb00b86b9af
to keep the delta to libav smaller.
__
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:00:48PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi all
>
> what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ?
>
> I still have these ideas from past suggestions:
> Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincaré, desitter, de broglie, Gauss,
> Galois, Viterbi, Darwin
>
> Are there other suggesti
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 03:02:30PM +0200, Jan Gerber wrote:
> On 06/25/2016 02:45 PM, Amancio Hasty wrote:
> > Most cool. Can you post the exact command line that you used to
> > test h264_omx?
>
> git remote add tmm1 https://github.com/tmm1/FFmpeg
> git fetch tmmi1
> git checkout -b omx
> git c
> On Jun 25, 2016, at 6:53 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Jan Gerber wrote:
>> On 06/25/2016 02:45 PM, Amancio Hasty wrote:
>>> Most cool. Can you post the exact command line that you used to
>>> test h264_omx?
>>
>> git remote add tmm1 https://github.com/tmm1/
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Jan Gerber wrote:
> On 06/25/2016 02:45 PM, Amancio Hasty wrote:
>> Most cool. Can you post the exact command line that you used to
>> test h264_omx?
>
> git remote add tmm1 https://github.com/tmm1/FFmpeg
> git fetch tmmi1
> git checkout -b omx
> git cherry-pick 2a
On 06/25/2016 02:45 PM, Amancio Hasty wrote:
> Most cool. Can you post the exact command line that you used to
> test h264_omx?
git remote add tmm1 https://github.com/tmm1/FFmpeg
git fetch tmmi1
git checkout -b omx
git cherry-pick 2a1fcc3775a390570679da7f507539a397fc7130
git cherry-pick 1087f0dc1
> On Jun 25, 2016, at 5:41 AM, Jan Gerber wrote:
>
> On 06/25/2016 11:17 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> where is that patch ?
>>> i see
>>> " --enable-omx-rpi enable encoding via OpenMAX IL for Raspberry Pi
>>> [no]"
>>> in ffmpeg git, what is missing?
>>
>> looking at tmm1/rebase-
On 06/25/2016 11:17 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> where is that patch ?
>> i see
>> " --enable-omx-rpi enable encoding via OpenMAX IL for Raspberry Pi
>> [no]"
>> in ffmpeg git, what is missing?
>
> looking at tmm1/rebase-omx i only see 2 one line patches that we
> dont have yet
> i c
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:03:27AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 09:54:54PM -0700, Amancio Hasty wrote:
> >
> > > On Jun 24, 2016, at 7:39 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 06:52:01PM -0700, Amancio Hasty wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 09:54:54PM -0700, Amancio Hasty wrote:
>
> > On Jun 24, 2016, at 7:39 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 06:52:01PM -0700, Amancio Hasty wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Jun 24, 2016, at 6:31 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Thu
> On Jun 24, 2016, at 7:39 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 06:52:01PM -0700, Amancio Hasty wrote:
>>
>>> On Jun 24, 2016, at 6:31 PM, Michael Niedermayer
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:00:48PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi all
>>
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:12:05PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 6/24/2016 10:31 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:00:48PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> Hi all
> >>
> >> what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ?
> >>
> >> I still have these ideas from past suggestions:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 06:52:01PM -0700, Amancio Hasty wrote:
>
> > On Jun 24, 2016, at 6:31 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:00:48PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> Hi all
> >>
> >> what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ?
> >>
> >> I still have these id
On 6/24/2016 10:31 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:00:48PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ?
>>
>> I still have these ideas from past suggestions:
>> Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincaré, desitter, de broglie, Gauss,
> On Jun 24, 2016, at 6:31 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:00:48PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ?
>>
>> I still have these ideas from past suggestions:
>> Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincaré, desitter, d
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:00:48PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi all
>
> what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ?
>
> I still have these ideas from past suggestions:
> Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincaré, desitter, de broglie, Gauss,
> Galois, Viterbi, Darwin
>
> Are there other suggesti
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ?
>
> I still have these ideas from past suggestions:
> Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincaré, desitter, de broglie, Gauss,
> Galois, Viterbi, Darwin
>
> Are there other suggestions?
> Is s
> From: ffmpeg-devel [mailto:ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org] On
> Behalf Of Wang Bin
> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 10:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name
>
> What about choosing a scientist who was born in FFmpeg release
> month?
Don't want it to loo
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel [mailto:ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org] On
> Behalf Of Michael Niedermayer
> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 5:01 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches de...@ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 3.1 name
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 23:00:48 +0200
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ?
> Are there other suggestions?
has fibonacci been used?
-compn
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/f
What about choosing a scientist who was born in FFmpeg release month?
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
2016.06.23. 23:23 keltezéssel, Paul B Mahol írta:
On 6/23/16, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
On 23 June 2016 at 22:00, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
Hi all
what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ?
I still have these ideas from past suggestions:
Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincare, desitter, de b
On 6/23/16, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> On 23 June 2016 at 22:00, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ?
>>
>> I still have these ideas from past suggestions:
>> Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincare, desitter, de broglie, Gauss,
>> Galois, Viterbi,
On 23 June 2016 at 22:00, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ?
>
> I still have these ideas from past suggestions:
> Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincaré, desitter, de broglie, Gauss,
> Galois, Viterbi, Darwin
>
> Are there other suggestions?
> Is somethin
Hi all
what shall FFmpeg 3.1 be called ?
I still have these ideas from past suggestions:
Von Neumann, Einstein, lorentz, poincaré, desitter, de broglie, Gauss, Galois,
Viterbi, Darwin
Are there other suggestions?
Is something preferred ?
In absence of any preferrance ill pick something randoml
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 10:23:20AM +0200, Matthieu Bouron wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 03:28:19AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > its time for making the next major release
> > If you want something in dont forget to push it to git master
>
> I'd like to have the 3 pendin
Am 06.06.2016 um 11:35 schrieb Timo Rothenpieler:
> I'd like to merge the cuvid decoder/hwaccel for 3.1.
Scratching that for now, will put some more work into that.
If it gets ready before 3.1, that's nice.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmp
On 6/6/2016 10:30 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 12:11:56AM -0300, James Almer wrote:
>> On 6/5/2016 10:28 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> its time for making the next major release
>>> If you want something in dont forget to push it to git master
>>>
>>>
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 03:48:43PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 03:28:19AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > its time for making the next major release
> > If you want something in dont forget to push it to git master
> >
> > If theres some bug yo
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 03:28:19AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi all
>
> its time for making the next major release
> If you want something in dont forget to push it to git master
>
> If theres some bug you care about or belive is important, please
> help fix them:
>
> regression bugs (
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 12:11:56AM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 6/5/2016 10:28 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > its time for making the next major release
> > If you want something in dont forget to push it to git master
> >
> > If theres some bug you care about or belive is im
hardware decoding dont work in the current git on osx. it is reported on
ticket 5595.
that with videotoolbox works in the current git on osx by the patch
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.ffmpeg.devel/214982 though
hardware decoding with vda dont work.
the pacth is need.
as mentioned on
Michael Niedermayer niedermayer.cc> writes:
> If you want something in dont forget to push it to git master
I don't know if is is easily possible but checkasm should be
disabled for ppc64 (be) in the release branch, not in git master.
This is ticket #5508.
Carl Eugen
I'd like to merge the cuvid decoder/hwaccel for 3.1.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 03:28:19AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi all
>
> its time for making the next major release
> If you want something in dont forget to push it to git master
I'd like to have the 3 pending MediaCodec patches merged before the
release.
I'll re-send to the ml the Medi
On 6/5/2016 10:28 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi all
>
> its time for making the next major release
> If you want something in dont forget to push it to git master
>
> If theres some bug you care about or belive is important, please
> help fix them:
>
> regression bugs (all, not just since
Hi all
its time for making the next major release
If you want something in dont forget to push it to git master
If theres some bug you care about or belive is important, please
help fix them:
regression bugs (all, not just since 3.0)
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/query?status=new&status=open&status=re
39 matches
Mail list logo
