On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 02:24:10PM +0100, Przemysław Sobala wrote:
> W dniu 01.01.2016 o 15:19, Michael Niedermayer pisze:
> (...)
> >
> >Also ill likely make another round of point releases from the
> >2.8/2.7/2.6/2.5 branches soon, that is if someone wants to backport
> >something or fix and back
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 02:44:07PM +0100, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > Przemysław Sobala grupawp.pl> writes:
> >
> >> I know it's a bit late but could you backport fixes for
> >> #4841, #4849, #5121, #5267
> >
> > None of these were reporte
W dniu 15.03.2016 o 14:40, Carl Eugen Hoyos pisze:
Przemysław Sobala grupawp.pl> writes:
I know it's a bit late but could you backport fixes for
#4841, #4849, #5121, #5267
None of these were reported as regresions and I don't think
any of them describe a security issue.
Generally, backports
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Przemysław Sobala grupawp.pl> writes:
>
>> I know it's a bit late but could you backport fixes for
>> #4841, #4849, #5121, #5267
>
> None of these were reported as regresions and I don't think
> any of them describe a security issue.
> Ge
Przemysław Sobala grupawp.pl> writes:
> I know it's a bit late but could you backport fixes for
> #4841, #4849, #5121, #5267
None of these were reported as regresions and I don't think
any of them describe a security issue.
Generally, backports should be held to a minimum to avoid
issues like
W dniu 01.01.2016 o 15:19, Michael Niedermayer pisze:
(...)
Also ill likely make another round of point releases from the
2.8/2.7/2.6/2.5 branches soon, that is if someone wants to backport
something or fix and backport ...
I know it's a bit late but could you backport fixes for #4841, #4849,
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 08:50:22AM +, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Carl Eugen Hoyos ag.or.at> writes:
>
> > Henrik Gramner gramner.com> writes:
> >
> > > The Ubuntu 16.04 LTS feature freeze is coming up next week,
> > > so it'd be nice to have a release before that.
> >
> > (I am all for it,
Carl Eugen Hoyos ag.or.at> writes:
> Henrik Gramner gramner.com> writes:
>
> > The Ubuntu 16.04 LTS feature freeze is coming up next week,
> > so it'd be nice to have a release before that.
>
> (I am all for it, I am not sure if it is still possible though.)
I was probably unclear yesterday:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 11:08:35PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 03:19:21PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > Its a while since 2.8 so unless there are objections i will make a
> > 2.9 or if people prefer a 3.0 within the next month or so
> >
> > A
On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 03:19:21PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Its a while since 2.8 so unless there are objections i will make a
> 2.9 or if people prefer a 3.0 within the next month or so
>
> Also ill likely make another round of point releases from the
> 2.8/2.7/2.6/2.5 bran
Michael Niedermayer niedermayer.cc> writes:
> > The following tickets are showstoppers imo:
> > #5090 and #5216
>
> 5090 and 5216 should be fixed by:
> 0212 11:21 Rodger Combs(2.0K) └─&─&─&─&─&─>
> Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavf/mov: add
> support for sidx fragment indexes
> please test an
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 07:34:26PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 04:04:29PM +, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > Henrik Gramner gramner.com> writes:
> >
> > > The Ubuntu 16.04 LTS feature freeze is coming up next week,
> > > so it'd be nice to have a release before th
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 04:04:29PM +, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Henrik Gramner gramner.com> writes:
>
> > The Ubuntu 16.04 LTS feature freeze is coming up next week,
> > so it'd be nice to have a release before that.
>
> (I am all for it, I am not sure if it is still possible though.)
>
>
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 06:04:36PM +, Γιώργος Μεταξάκης wrote:
> I have also fixed the #5008 have anyone checked it ?
> [patch] gdigrab-mouse-dpi-awareness
maybe matt or someone else who worked on similar stuff can take a look
at the code
>
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 8:03 PM Michael Niederma
I have also fixed the #5008 have anyone checked it ?
[patch] gdigrab-mouse-dpi-awareness
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 8:03 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 04:04:29PM +, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > Henrik Gramner gramner.com> writes:
> >
> > > The Ubuntu 16.04 LTS feature
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 04:04:29PM +, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Henrik Gramner gramner.com> writes:
>
> > The Ubuntu 16.04 LTS feature freeze is coming up next week,
> > so it'd be nice to have a release before that.
>
> (I am all for it, I am not sure if it is still possible though.)
>
>
On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 13:07:04 -0300
James Almer wrote:
> On 2/14/2016 1:04 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > Henrik Gramner gramner.com> writes:
> >
> >> The Ubuntu 16.04 LTS feature freeze is coming up next week,
> >> so it'd be nice to have a release before that.
> >
> > (I am all for it,
On 2/14/2016 1:04 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Henrik Gramner gramner.com> writes:
>
>> The Ubuntu 16.04 LTS feature freeze is coming up next week,
>> so it'd be nice to have a release before that.
>
> (I am all for it, I am not sure if it is still possible though.)
>
> The following tickets
Henrik Gramner gramner.com> writes:
> The Ubuntu 16.04 LTS feature freeze is coming up next week,
> so it'd be nice to have a release before that.
(I am all for it, I am not sure if it is still possible though.)
The following tickets are showstoppers imo:
#5215
#5090 and #5216
I wonder if the
On 2/14/2016 12:54 PM, Henrik Gramner wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> Its a while since 2.8 so unless there are objections i will make a
>> 2.9 or if people prefer a 3.0 within the next month or so
>
> The Ubuntu 16.04 LTS feature freeze is co
On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Its a while since 2.8 so unless there are objections i will make a
> 2.9 or if people prefer a 3.0 within the next month or so
The Ubuntu 16.04 LTS feature freeze is coming up next week, so it'd be
nice to have a release befo
Michael Niedermayer niedermayer.cc> writes:
> Also ill likely make another round of point releases
> from the 2.8/2.7/2.6/2.5 branches soon
Will you backport the fix for ticket #5096?
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
On 02.01.2016 21:03, James Almer wrote:
> On 1/2/2016 1:16 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>> On 02.01.2016 17:12, James Almer wrote:
>>> Some time ago it was argued that the ffmpeg version should for example
>>> get a major bump when some considerable changes were made to the CLI
>>> tools. Users tha
On 1/2/2016 1:16 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> On 02.01.2016 17:12, James Almer wrote:
>> On 1/2/2016 8:42 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>>> On 01.01.2016 15:19, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Its a while since 2.8 so unless there are objections i will make a
2.9 or if people prefer a 3.0 wit
On 02.01.2016 17:12, James Almer wrote:
> On 1/2/2016 8:42 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>> On 01.01.2016 15:19, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> Its a while since 2.8 so unless there are objections i will make a
>>> 2.9 or if people prefer a 3.0 within the next month or so
>>
>> I think using 3.0 wou
On 1/2/2016 8:42 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> On 01.01.2016 15:19, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> Its a while since 2.8 so unless there are objections i will make a
>> 2.9 or if people prefer a 3.0 within the next month or so
>
> I think using 3.0 would better due to the backwards incompatible
>
On 01.01.2016 15:19, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Its a while since 2.8 so unless there are objections i will make a
> 2.9 or if people prefer a 3.0 within the next month or so
I think using 3.0 would better due to the backwards incompatible
API changes.
We should do this always to give the major
On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 6:19 AM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Its a while since 2.8 so unless there are objections i will make a
> 2.9 or if people prefer a 3.0 within the next month or so
No opinion on 2.9 vs 3.0.
If going with 3.0, I propose the release name "Boole" or "Shannon" -
htt
Paul B Mahol gmail.com> writes:
> On 1/1/16, Michael Niedermayer niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > Its a while since 2.8 so unless there are objections i will make a
> > 2.9 or if people prefer a 3.0 within the next month or so
The number of open regressions is quite high atm...
> Ther
I think a 3.0 release needs more major things, so a 2.9 would make more
sense IMO.
On 1 January 2016 at 14:28, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 1/1/16, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > Its a while since 2.8 so unless there are objections i will make a
> > 2.9 or if people prefer a 3.0 with
On 1/1/16, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Its a while since 2.8 so unless there are objections i will make a
> 2.9 or if people prefer a 3.0 within the next month or so
>
> Also ill likely make another round of point releases from the
> 2.8/2.7/2.6/2.5 branches soon, that is if someone wa
Hi all
Its a while since 2.8 so unless there are objections i will make a
2.9 or if people prefer a 3.0 within the next month or so
Also ill likely make another round of point releases from the
2.8/2.7/2.6/2.5 branches soon, that is if someone wants to backport
something or fix and backport ...
32 matches
Mail list logo
