On 01.01.2016 15:19, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Its a while since 2.8 so unless there are objections i will make a > 2.9 or if people prefer a 3.0 within the next month or so
I think using 3.0 would better due to the backwards incompatible API changes. We should do this always to give the major version a defined meaning. That way we would use semantic versioning[1]. > Also ill likely make another round of point releases from the > 2.8/2.7/2.6/2.5 branches soon, that is if someone wants to backport > something or fix and backport ... I have a couple of fixes in preparation. Happy new year, Andreas 1: http://semver.org _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
