I think a 3.0 release needs more major things, so a 2.9 would make more sense IMO.
On 1 January 2016 at 14:28, Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 1/1/16, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > > Hi all > > > > Its a while since 2.8 so unless there are objections i will make a > > 2.9 or if people prefer a 3.0 within the next month or so > > > > Also ill likely make another round of point releases from the > > 2.8/2.7/2.6/2.5 branches soon, that is if someone wants to backport > > something or fix and backport ... > > There were major bump, so 3.0 makes more sense.... > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
