On 03/12/2016 10:28 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 10:25 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 10:16 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 06:39 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 04:37:39PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 04:33 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 10:25 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 10:16 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 06:39 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 04:37:39PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 04:33 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 04:29 PM, Michael Niedermayer
On 03/12/2016 10:16 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 06:39 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 04:37:39PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 04:33 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 04:29 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 02:54:45PM +01
On 03/12/2016 06:39 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 04:37:39PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 04:33 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 04:29 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 02:54:45PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 02:52
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 04:37:39PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> On 03/12/2016 04:33 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
> >On 03/12/2016 04:29 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >>On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 02:54:45PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> >>>On 03/12/2016 02:52 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sat
On 03/12/2016 04:42 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 04:37 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 04:33 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 04:29 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 02:54:45PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 02:52 PM, Michael Niedermayer
On 03/12/2016 04:37 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 04:33 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 04:29 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 02:54:45PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 02:52 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 02:36:59PM +01
On 03/12/2016 04:33 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 04:29 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 02:54:45PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 02:52 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 02:36:59PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 02:26
On 03/12/2016 04:29 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 02:54:45PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 02:52 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 02:36:59PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 02:26 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 12:53
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 02:54:45PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> On 03/12/2016 02:52 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 02:36:59PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> >>On 03/12/2016 02:26 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
> >>>On 03/12/2016 12:53 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sat
On 03/12/2016 03:00 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 02:54 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 02:52 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 02:36:59PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 02:26 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 12:53 PM, Michael Niedermayer
On 03/12/2016 02:54 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 02:52 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 02:36:59PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 02:26 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 12:53 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 07:14:16AM +01
On 03/12/2016 02:52 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 02:36:59PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 02:26 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 12:53 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 07:14:16AM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
Here's an interestin
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 02:36:59PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> On 03/12/2016 02:26 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
> >On 03/12/2016 12:53 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >>On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 07:14:16AM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> >>>Here's an interesting one. Windows Media Player won't make any
On 03/12/2016 02:26 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 12:53 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 07:14:16AM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
Here's an interesting one. Windows Media Player won't make any palette
changes without the xxpc chunks beeing indexed.
Fixing the logic
On 03/12/2016 12:53 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 07:14:16AM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
Here's an interesting one. Windows Media Player won't make any palette
changes without the xxpc chunks beeing indexed.
Fixing the logic for reading and seeking with xxpc chunks in t
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 07:14:16AM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> Here's an interesting one. Windows Media Player won't make any palette
> changes without the xxpc chunks beeing indexed.
>
> Fixing the logic for reading and seeking with xxpc chunks in the
> demuxer is a future task. Now the muxing
On 03/12/2016 08:31 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 07:14 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
Here's an interesting one. Windows Media Player won't make any palette
changes without the xxpc chunks beeing indexed.
Fixing the logic for reading and seeking with xxpc chunks in the demuxer
is a future
On 03/12/2016 07:14 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
Here's an interesting one. Windows Media Player won't make any palette
changes without the xxpc chunks beeing indexed.
Fixing the logic for reading and seeking with xxpc chunks in the demuxer
is a future task. Now the muxing of video with xxpc chunk
Here's an interesting one. Windows Media Player won't make any palette
changes without the xxpc chunks beeing indexed.
Fixing the logic for reading and seeking with xxpc chunks in the demuxer
is a future task. Now the muxing of video with xxpc chunks works
properly at least.
Try playing the
20 matches
Mail list logo
