On 03/12/2016 04:33 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 04:29 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 02:54:45PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 02:52 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 02:36:59PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 02:26 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/12/2016 12:53 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 07:14:16AM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
Here's an interesting one. Windows Media Player won't make any
palette
changes without the xxpc chunks beeing indexed.
Fixing the logic for reading and seeking with xxpc chunks in the
demuxer is a future task. Now the muxing of video with xxpc chunks
works properly at least.
Try playing the resulting test.avi file from the command line below
with Windows Media Player, with and without this patch.
ffmpeg -i TOON.AVI -c:v copy -c:a copy test.avi
Mats
--
Mats Peterson
http://matsp888.no-ip.org/~mats/
libavformat/avi.h | 6 +++-
libavformat/avienc.c | 56
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
tests/ref/lavf-fate/avi_cram | 4 +--
3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
2cf2565f9e258ee1a2bfcb83e4f30ecb1c13296d
0002-Add-xxpc-entries-to-index.patch
From 50f6c1dd38f503e77d53e0e6cdbadfe511282126 Mon Sep 17
00:00:00 2001
From: Mats Peterson <matsp...@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 07:00:33 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] lavf/avienc: Add xxpc entries to index
---
libavformat/avi.h | 6 ++++-
libavformat/avienc.c | 56
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
tests/ref/lavf-fate/avi_cram | 4 +--
3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavformat/avi.h b/libavformat/avi.h
index 34da76f..af21f2c 100644
--- a/libavformat/avi.h
+++ b/libavformat/avi.h
@@ -32,7 +32,11 @@
#define AVI_MASTER_INDEX_SIZE 256
#define AVI_MAX_STREAM_COUNT 100
+/* stream header flags */
+#define AVISF_VIDEO_PALCHANGES 0x00010000
+
/* index flags */
-#define AVIIF_INDEX 0x10
+#define AVIIF_INDEX 0x00000010
+#define AVIIF_NO_TIME 0x00000100
#endif /* AVFORMAT_AVI_H */
diff --git a/libavformat/avienc.c b/libavformat/avienc.c
index ad50379..b731bc2 100644
--- a/libavformat/avienc.c
+++ b/libavformat/avienc.c
@@ -44,13 +44,14 @@
*/
typedef struct AVIIentry {
- unsigned int flags, pos, len;
+ char tag[5];
the tag should be 4 bytes
5 is ugly, it requires padding and bloats the structure with a zero
byte
OK.
+ unsigned int flags;
+ unsigned int pos;
+ unsigned int len;
} AVIIentry;
#define AVI_INDEX_CLUSTER_SIZE 16384
-#define AVISF_VIDEO_PALCHANGES 0x00010000
-
typedef struct AVIIndex {
int64_t indx_start;
int64_t audio_strm_offset;
@@ -612,9 +613,13 @@ static int avi_write_idx1(AVFormatContext *s)
}
if (!empty) {
avist = s->streams[stream_id]->priv_data;
- avi_stream2fourcc(tag, stream_id,
+ if (*ie->tag)
==18406== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s,
==18406== at 0x598D80: avi_write_idx1 (avienc.c:616)
==18406== by 0x599D6D: avi_write_trailer (avienc.c:859)
==18406== by 0x64A234: av_write_trailer (mux.c:1124)
==18406== by 0x43A729: transcode (ffmpeg.c:4173)
==18406== by 0x43ACE3: main (ffmpeg.c:4334)
OK.
It's not really uninitalised, is it? Since it isn't used by anything
but my own code, it's all zero bytes, right?
after this patch snow encoding failed, i run valgrind and saw this
so there was something wrong, i dont know for sure if it was this
OK. By the way, are you in the process of applying patch 1 at least?
patch one has a list of exceptions, this list contains every single
case for which evidence has been provided
that is all evidence provided so far is consistent in that a biSize
of 40 is wrong for non palette global headers.
40 is exactly what it should be, in *all* cases, regardless of what
follows the BITMAPINFOHEADER. Read below.
The spec says:
"A stream format chunk ('strf') must follow the stream header chunk.
The stream format chunk describes the format of the data in the
stream. The data contained in this chunk depends on the stream type.
For video streams, the information is a BITMAPINFO structure,
including palette information if appropriate. For audio streams, the
information is a WAVEFORMATEX structure."
If that chunk is a BITMAPINFO structure + a palette then formats
without a palette would likely have biSize similar to the chunk
size ...
its quite possible iam missing some details of course ...
You're missing the specification of the BITMAPINFOHEADER. It states that
biSize is the size of the structure, i.e. the BITMAPINFOHEADER itself.
No less, no more.
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/dd183376%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
Now, the HuffYUV author has invented his own spec-breaking
BITMAPINFOHEADER, and for asv1/asv2, I can accept a biSize of 48 since
that's what ASUS writes to their files. But that's it.
Mats
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
