Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

Kieran Kunhya (2018-03-05): > Ladies and Gentleman I present you exhibit A, Michael Wait, what? "exhibit"? When did this thread become a trial? Regards, -- Nicolas George signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list f

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

On Sun, 4 Mar 2018 at 22:59 Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 09:45:03AM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 9:24 AM, Compn wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 06:59:45 -0500, "Ronald S. Bultje" > > > wrote: > > > > Again, please: no advertis

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 09:45:03AM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 9:24 AM, Compn wrote: > > > On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 06:59:45 -0500, "Ronald S. Bultje" > > wrote: > > > Again, please: no advertising, no politics. It was fun while it lasted > > but > > > it's turning

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

On Sun, Mar 4, 2018, at 10:54 AM, Compn wrote: > > I still have not seen an argument for why politics should not be > involved on ffmpeg. only some strawman argument about kittens on > youtube. ___

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

On Sun, 4 Mar 2018 20:18:49 +0100, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > Everyone is entitled to their opinion and their own politics, but you > should also be respectful of those that do not want politics involved > in FFmpeg. Its not the place for it. software patents directly affect ffmpeg, should we igno

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 8:13 PM, Compn wrote: > On Sun, 04 Mar 2018 16:40:55 +, Kieran Kunhya > wrote: > >> >> +1 > > just you wait until net neutrality is really dead. your rival > broadcast encoder vendors will pay the extra $5k and have your site > slowed or de-listed from the internet, kie

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

On Sun, 04 Mar 2018 16:40:55 +, Kieran Kunhya wrote: > > +1 just you wait until net neutrality is really dead. your rival broadcast encoder vendors will pay the extra $5k and have your site slowed or de-listed from the internet, kieran. Then you can just pay the ISP $5k per year to get off

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

On Sun, Mar 4, 2018, at 5:45 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > > I'm so sick of everything being about politics, everything being > politicized, everything being presented about the end of the world, and > everything being pushed in my face and everyone being forced to > continuously pay attention, hav

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

On Sun, 4 Mar 2018 09:45:03 -0500, "Ronald S. Bultje" wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 9:24 AM, Compn wrote: > > > On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 06:59:45 -0500, "Ronald S. Bultje" > > wrote: > > > Again, please: no advertising, no politics. It was fun while it lasted > > but > > > it's turning in

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

On Sun, 4 Mar 2018 at 14:50 Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 9:24 AM, Compn wrote: > > > On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 06:59:45 -0500, "Ronald S. Bultje" > > wrote: > > > Again, please: no advertising, no politics. It was fun while it lasted > > but > > > it's turning into somethin

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

Hi, On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 9:24 AM, Compn wrote: > On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 06:59:45 -0500, "Ronald S. Bultje" > wrote: > > Again, please: no advertising, no politics. It was fun while it lasted > but > > it's turning into something semi-permanent now, I really have significant > > issues with this.

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 06:59:45 -0500, "Ronald S. Bultje" wrote: > Hi, > > Again, please: no advertising, no politics. It was fun while it lasted but > it's turning into something semi-permanent now, I really have significant > issues with this. this isnt advertising. what is your significant issu

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 13:17:08 +0100, wm4 wrote: > On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 11:49:16 + > Ricardo Constantino wrote: > > > On 1 March 2018 at 01:19, Michael Niedermayer > > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:33:55PM -0900, Lou Logan wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018, at 11:25 AM, Jan E

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 11:49:16 + Ricardo Constantino wrote: > On 1 March 2018 at 01:19, Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:33:55PM -0900, Lou Logan wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018, at 11:25 AM, Jan Ekström wrote: > > > > > > > > Looking at how much it got updat

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

Hi, On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 6:49 AM, Ricardo Constantino wrote: > There's a lot more places where people can get their armchair politics > satisfied than ffmpeg.org. > I 100% agree with this ... > A banner or a news post would make more sense. ... but I pretty strongly disagree with this. L

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

On 1 March 2018 at 01:19, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:33:55PM -0900, Lou Logan wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018, at 11:25 AM, Jan Ekström wrote: > > > > > > Looking at how much it got updated the last time when it misbehaved > > > shows really well how that worked the l

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 07:52:56PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 3:41 PM, Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > > > ATM IIUC one more vote is needed in the senate > > > Yikes. I would prefer if we don't meddle into politics like this. > > You ignore the fact that a

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:33:55PM -0900, Lou Logan wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018, at 11:25 AM, Jan Ekström wrote: > > > > Looking at how much it got updated the last time when it misbehaved > > shows really well how that worked the last time. Sorry if I sound > > facetious, but I do use ffmpeg-al

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

Hi, On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 3:41 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > ATM IIUC one more vote is needed in the senate Yikes. I would prefer if we don't meddle into politics like this. You ignore the fact that any legislation needs to go through the US House of Representatives, and then it should b

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018, at 11:25 AM, Jan Ekström wrote: > > Looking at how much it got updated the last time when it misbehaved > shows really well how that worked the last time. Sorry if I sound > facetious, but I do use ffmpeg-all.html a lot and it got /really/ > irritating. +1. I object to the

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

On 28 February 2018 at 20:41, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 03:25:51PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Michael Niedermayer < > > mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > > > > > The widget has new content. > > > > > > Could you elabo

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 03:25:51PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Michael Niedermayer < > mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > > > The widget has new content. > > > Could you elaborate on what the new content is? yes, of course > What political campai

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

Hi, On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Michael Niedermayer < mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > The widget has new content. Could you elaborate on what the new content is? What political campaign will we as project members support by applying this patch? Thanks, Ronald ___

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 10:10 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 09:52:19PM +0200, Jan Ekström wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 7:17 PM, Michael Niedermayer >> wrote: >> > +https://widget.battleforthenet.com/widget.js"; >> > async> >> >> Please use >> https://deve

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 21:00:27 +0100 Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 07:17:25PM +, Ricardo Constantino wrote: > > On 28 February 2018 at 19:13, Michael Niedermayer > > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 06:28:44PM +, Ricardo Constantino wrote: > > > > On 28

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 09:52:19PM +0200, Jan Ekström wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 7:17 PM, Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > > +https://widget.battleforthenet.com/widget.js"; > > async> > > Please use > https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/Subresource_Integrity > . Th

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 07:17:25PM +, Ricardo Constantino wrote: > On 28 February 2018 at 19:13, Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 06:28:44PM +, Ricardo Constantino wrote: > > > On 28 February 2018 at 17:17, Michael Niedermayer > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > The

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 7:17 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > +https://widget.battleforthenet.com/widget.js"; > async> Please use https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/Subresource_Integrity . That way this third-party entity will only get loaded if the content matches a

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 07:39:23PM +0100, wm4 wrote: > On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 18:17:42 +0100 > Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > The widget has new content. > > > > This reverts commit 9275cd54eddb83faf5bd40ffaccb5717de8b798d. > > --- > > src/template_head2 | 23 +++ > > 1 file

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

On 28 February 2018 at 19:13, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 06:28:44PM +, Ricardo Constantino wrote: > > On 28 February 2018 at 17:17, Michael Niedermayer > > > wrote: > > > > > The widget has new content. > > > > > > > > Does it shut itself up when the time's passed n

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 06:28:44PM +, Ricardo Constantino wrote: > On 28 February 2018 at 17:17, Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > > > The widget has new content. > > > > Does it shut itself up when the time's passed now? we can disable it manually easily if it does not > Or check if the vi

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 18:17:42 +0100 Michael Niedermayer wrote: > The widget has new content. > > This reverts commit 9275cd54eddb83faf5bd40ffaccb5717de8b798d. > --- > src/template_head2 | 23 +++ > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/src/template_head2 b/src/te

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

On 28 February 2018 at 17:17, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > The widget has new content. > Does it shut itself up when the time's passed now? Or check if the visitor's IP isn't from USA? > > This reverts commit 9275cd54eddb83faf5bd40ffaccb5717de8b798d. > --- > src/template_head2 | 23 ++

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Remove battleforthenet widget"

The widget has new content. This reverts commit 9275cd54eddb83faf5bd40ffaccb5717de8b798d. --- src/template_head2 | 23 +++ 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/template_head2 b/src/template_head2 index a0b11ab..71daf07 100644 --- a/src/template_head2 +++ b/src/te