On 28 February 2018 at 20:41, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 03:25:51PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Michael Niedermayer < > > mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > > > > > The widget has new content. > > > > > > Could you elaborate on what the new content is? > > yes, of course > > > > What political campaign > > will we as project members support by applying this patch? > > Its the same goal as previous, to protect net neutrality > ATM IIUC one more vote is needed in the senate > Its certainly imaginable that in a few days something else will be > suggested by the widget to protect net neutrality as the situation > changes ... > Except most of the information in https://www.battleforthenet.com/onemorevote/ only mentions yesterday's date. So what's the point of adding this now? > > Thats also why its not usfull at all to copy this widget locally or > to use a checksum on it. It has to be able to adapt to changes in the > political situation surrounding net neutrality > > Thanks > > > [...] > -- > Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB > > Asymptotically faster algorithms should always be preferred if you have > asymptotical amounts of data > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
