Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 3:13 AM, Davinder Singh wrote: > On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 6:15 PM Robert Krüger > wrote: > > > [...] > > what is the way to best contribute with test cases? I have two samples > that > > I use for testing, so far the results look very, very promising but there > > are stil

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:20 PM Clément Bœsch wrote: > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:31:10AM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Robert Krüger > > > wrote: > > > > > > what is the way to best contribute with test cases? I have two samples > that > > > I use for testing,

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 6:15 PM Robert Krüger wrote: > [...] > what is the way to best contribute with test cases? I have two samples that > I use for testing, so far the results look very, very promising but there > are still a few artefact problems, so these could maybe serve as a good > test c

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:31:10AM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Robert Krüger > wrote: > > > > what is the way to best contribute with test cases? I have two samples that > > I use for testing, so far the results look very, very promising but there > > are still a

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Robert Krüger > wrote: > > > > what is the way to best contribute with test cases? I have two samples > that > > I use for testing, so far the results look very, very promising but there > > are still a few

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Robert Krüger wrote: > > what is the way to best contribute with test cases? I have two samples that > I use for testing, so far the results look very, very promising but there > are still a few artefact problems, so these could maybe serve as a good > test case. I

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Davinder Singh wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 5:01 AM Andy Furniss wrote: > > > > > > > I am testing with a somewhat artificial sample in that it's a framerate > > de-interlace + scale down of a 1080i master, though it is "real" in the > > sense that I may wan

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 08:17:03PM +, Davinder Singh wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 8:03 PM Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > > > [...] > > > > why do these not try predictors like epzs / umh ? > > i guess some paper doesnt say exlpicitly it should be done > > but really it should be done for

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 08:17:03PM +, Davinder Singh wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 8:03 PM Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > > > [...] > > > > why do these not try predictors like epzs / umh ? > > i guess some paper doesnt say exlpicitly it should be done > > but really it should be done for

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 5:01 AM Andy Furniss wrote: > > > I am testing with a somewhat artificial sample in that it's a framerate > de-interlace + scale down of a 1080i master, though it is "real" in the > sense that I may want to repair similar files where people have produced > a juddery mess b

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 8:03 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > [...] > > why do these not try predictors like epzs / umh ? > i guess some paper doesnt say exlpicitly it should be done > but really it should be done for all predictive zonal searches IMO > this should be in different patch. no? yeah

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 01:17:47PM +, Davinder Singh wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 5:38 AM Andy Furniss wrote: > > > [...] > > > > Nice I can see the edges are better than the last version. > > > > The doc/filters.texi hunk doesn't apply to git master. > > > > I was going to post some comp

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

Davinder Singh wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 5:38 AM Andy Furniss wrote: [...] Nice I can see the edges are better than the last version. The doc/filters.texi hunk doesn't apply to git master. I was going to post some comparisons with mcfps tonight, but I'll need to redo them to see what's

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 5:38 AM Andy Furniss wrote: > [...] > > Nice I can see the edges are better than the last version. > > The doc/filters.texi hunk doesn't apply to git master. > > I was going to post some comparisons with mcfps tonight, but I'll need > to redo them to see what's changed.

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

Davinder Singh wrote: On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:13 AM Davinder Singh wrote: [...] final patch attached. please review. this includes bug fixes and various other improvements. also added filter docs. Nice I can see the edges are better than the last version. The doc/filters.texi hunk does

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:13 AM Davinder Singh wrote: > [...] > final patch attached. please review. this includes bug fixes and various other improvements. also added filter docs. 0001-added-motion-estimation-and-interpolation-filters-v3F.patch Description: Binary data ___

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 06:39:17PM +, Davinder Singh wrote: > On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 5:45 PM Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > > > how does it perform with matrixbench instead of BBB ? > > > > as reference 100fps matrixbench generated with mcfps > > from https://github.com/michaelni/FFmpeg/tree

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 5:45 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > how does it perform with matrixbench instead of BBB ? > > as reference 100fps matrixbench generated with mcfps > from https://github.com/michaelni/FFmpeg/tree/mcfps > ./ffmpeg -i matrixbench_mpeg2.mpg -vf 'mcfps=3:100,setpts=4*PTS' > ou

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:59 PM Robert Krüger wrote: > [...] Impressive results, great job! thanks :) > > I just tried minterpolate=fps=250:mc_mode=aobmc:me=epzs and did have some > artefacts in one of my slowmo samples but overall the quality is very, very > nice! If you're interested in mor

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 07:26:39PM +, Davinder Singh wrote: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:52 PM Paul B Mahol wrote: > > > [...] > > > > i tried to modify EPZS. i removed the early termination threshold which > skip some predictors :-/ > new score: > $ tiny_psnr 60_source_2.yuv 60_bbb.yuv > st

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 8/19/16, Davinder Singh wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 3:27 AM Paul B Mahol wrote: > > > >> On 8/18/16, Paul B Mahol wrote: > >> > On 8/18/16, Davinder Singh wrote: > >> >> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:52 PM Paul B Mahol > wrote: >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On 8/19/16, Davinder Singh wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 3:27 AM Paul B Mahol wrote: > >> On 8/18/16, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> > On 8/18/16, Davinder Singh wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:52 PM Paul B Mahol wrote: >> >> >> >>> [...] >> >>> >> >> >> >> i tried to modify EPZS. i removed

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:19:22 +, Davinder Singh wrote: > > Same here and many other places. "!=" is a valid operator. ;) > > yes, that would be in case of == operator, not = operator, no? D'uh, stupid me, I missed that. Sorry! > will do. can you tell which is faster? I *believe* switch/c

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 3:27 AM Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 8/18/16, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On 8/18/16, Davinder Singh wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:52 PM Paul B Mahol wrote: > >> > >>> [...] > >>> > >> > >> i tried to modify EPZS. i removed the early termination threshold which > >> sk

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 1:50 AM Moritz Barsnick wrote: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 19:26:39 +, Davinder Singh wrote: > > > +@table @option > > +@item algo > > +Set the algorithm to be used. Accepts one of the following values: > > + > > +@table @samp > > +@item ebma > > +Exhaustive block matchi

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On 8/18/16, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 8/18/16, Davinder Singh wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:52 PM Paul B Mahol wrote: >> >>> [...] >>> >> >> i tried to modify EPZS. i removed the early termination threshold which >> skip some predictors :-/ >> new score: >> $ tiny_psnr 60_source_2.yuv 60_b

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On 8/18/16, Davinder Singh wrote: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:52 PM Paul B Mahol wrote: > >> [...] >> > > i tried to modify EPZS. i removed the early termination threshold which > skip some predictors :-/ > new score: > $ tiny_psnr 60_source_2.yuv 60_bbb.yuv > stddev: 1.02 PSNR: 47.94 MAXDIFF: 1

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 19:26:39 +, Davinder Singh wrote: > +@table @option > +@item algo > +Set the algorithm to be used. Accepts one of the following values: > + > +@table @samp > +@item ebma > +Exhaustive block matching algorithm. > +@end table > +Default value is @samp{ebma}. [...] > +

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:52 PM Paul B Mahol wrote: > [...] > i tried to modify EPZS. i removed the early termination threshold which skip some predictors :-/ new score: $ tiny_psnr 60_source_2.yuv 60_bbb.yuv stddev: 1.02 PSNR: 47.94 MAXDIFF: 186 bytes:476928000/474163200 original epzs: $ tiny

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On 8/18/16, Davinder Singh wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 1:47 AM Paul B Mahol wrote: > >> [...] > > > hi, > > made EPZS work correctly: > https://github.com/dsmudhar/FFmpeg/commit/0fc7a5490252a7f9832775b2773b35a42025553b > also reduced no of repeated predictors which increased the speed also.

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 1:47 AM Paul B Mahol wrote: > [...] hi, made EPZS work correctly: https://github.com/dsmudhar/FFmpeg/commit/0fc7a5490252a7f9832775b2773b35a42025553b also reduced no of repeated predictors which increased the speed also. > What about artifacts with UMH? > See for examp

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 5:46 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > [...] > > not sure i suggested it previously already but you can add yourself > to the MAINTAINERs file if you want to maintain / continue working on > the code after GSoC > i surely will. thanks __

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 12:18:56PM +, Davinder Singh wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 12:10 AM Davinder Singh wrote: > > > [...] > > > > latest changes: > https://github.com/dsmudhar/FFmpeg/blob/dev/libavfilter/vf_minterpolate.c > uses shared motion estimation code now, added options, improve

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016, 1:47 AM Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 8/15/16, Davinder Singh wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 1:40 AM Davinder Singh > wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 8:05 PM Paul B Mahol wrote: > >> > >>> [...] > >> > >> > >>> Also, why is there no code for scene change detection?

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On 8/15/16, Davinder Singh wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 1:40 AM Davinder Singh wrote: > >> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 8:05 PM Paul B Mahol wrote: >> >>> [...] >> >> >>> Also, why is there no code for scene change detection? >>> If scene changes abruptly it will give bad frame. >>> >> >> added s

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 1:40 AM Davinder Singh wrote: > On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 8:05 PM Paul B Mahol wrote: > >> [...] > > >> Also, why is there no code for scene change detection? >> If scene changes abruptly it will give bad frame. >> > > added scene change detection from framerate filter: > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 8:05 PM Paul B Mahol wrote: > [...] > Also, why is there no code for scene change detection? > If scene changes abruptly it will give bad frame. > added scene change detection from framerate filter: https://github.com/dsmudhar/FFmpeg/commit/1ad01c530569dfa1f085a31b6435597

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 12:18:56PM +, Davinder Singh wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 12:10 AM Davinder Singh wrote: > > > [...] > > > > latest changes: > https://github.com/dsmudhar/FFmpeg/blob/dev/libavfilter/vf_minterpolate.c > uses shared motion estimation code now, added options, improve

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 03:51:17PM +, Davinder Singh wrote: > On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 8:05 PM Paul B Mahol wrote: > > > On 8/13/16, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > > On 8/13/16, Davinder Singh wrote: > > >> > > >> patch attached. > > >> > > > > > > Please add EPZS to minterpolate. > > > > > > > Als

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 8:05 PM Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 8/13/16, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On 8/13/16, Davinder Singh wrote: > >> > >> patch attached. > >> > > > > Please add EPZS to minterpolate. > > > > Also, why is there no code for scene change detection? If scene changes abruptly it will g

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 7:28 PM Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 8/13/16, Davinder Singh wrote: > > > > patch attached. > > > > Please add EPZS to minterpolate. > added. https://github.com/dsmudhar/FFmpeg/commit/1ad40c3f405625075b93dde71a749593dc64f0e3 > __

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On 8/13/16, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 8/13/16, Davinder Singh wrote: >> >> patch attached. >> > > Please add EPZS to minterpolate. > Also, why is there no code for scene change detection? If scene changes abruptly it will give bad frame. ___ ffmpeg-deve

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On 8/13/16, Davinder Singh wrote: > > patch attached. > Please add EPZS to minterpolate. ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 12:10 AM Davinder Singh wrote: > [...] > > latest changes: https://github.com/dsmudhar/FFmpeg/blob/dev/libavfilter/vf_minterpolate.c uses shared motion estimation code now, added options, improved vsbmc i tried to make filter options as flexible as possible so that multipl

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 9:09 PM Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 8/10/16, Davinder Singh wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 9:35 AM Davinder Singh > wrote: > > > >> https://github.com/dsmudhar/FFmpeg/commits/dev > >> > >> The Paper 2 algorithm is complete. It seems good. If I compare Paper 2 > >> (whic

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On 8/10/16, Davinder Singh wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 9:35 AM Davinder Singh wrote: > >> https://github.com/dsmudhar/FFmpeg/commits/dev >> >> The Paper 2 algorithm is complete. It seems good. If I compare Paper 2 >> (which uses bilateral motion estimation) v/s motion vectors exported by >>

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 9:35 AM Davinder Singh wrote: > https://github.com/dsmudhar/FFmpeg/commits/dev > > The Paper 2 algorithm is complete. It seems good. If I compare Paper 2 > (which uses bilateral motion estimation) v/s motion vectors exported by > mEstimate filter: > > $ tiny_psnr 60_source

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 4:50 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 07:30:14PM +, Davinder Singh wrote: > > hi > > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 9:55 PM Ronald S. Bultje > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 5:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer > > > > > > wrote:

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 08:41:28AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 7:20 AM, Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 07:30:14PM +, Davinder Singh wrote: > > > hi > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 9:55 PM Ronald S. Bultje > > wrote: > > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

Hi, On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 7:20 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 07:30:14PM +, Davinder Singh wrote: > > hi > > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 9:55 PM Ronald S. Bultje > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 5:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer > > > > > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 07:30:14PM +, Davinder Singh wrote: > hi > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 9:55 PM Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 5:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer > > > > wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 04:05:54AM +, Davinder Singh wrote: > > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 1:06 AM Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Davinder Singh > wrote: > > > hi > > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 9:55 PM Ronald S. Bultje > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 5:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer > > > > > > wro

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

Hi, On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Davinder Singh wrote: > hi > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 9:55 PM Ronald S. Bultje > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 5:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer > > > > wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 04:05:54AM +, Davinder Singh wrote: > > > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

hi On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 9:55 PM Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 5:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 04:05:54AM +, Davinder Singh wrote: > > > https://github.com/dsmudhar/FFmpeg/commits/dev > > > So, correct me if I'm wrong, but

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 12:25:07PM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 5:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 04:05:54AM +, Davinder Singh wrote: > > > https://github.com/dsmudhar/FFmpeg/commits/dev > > > So, correct me if I'm wrong

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

Hi, On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 5:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 04:05:54AM +, Davinder Singh wrote: > > https://github.com/dsmudhar/FFmpeg/commits/dev So, correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems the complete ME code currently lives inside the filter. I wonder if tha

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 04:05:54AM +, Davinder Singh wrote: > https://github.com/dsmudhar/FFmpeg/commits/dev > > The Paper 2 algorithm is complete. It seems good. If I compare Paper 2 > (which uses bilateral motion estimation) v/s motion vectors exported by good! > mEstimate filter: > > $

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

https://github.com/dsmudhar/FFmpeg/commits/dev The Paper 2 algorithm is complete. It seems good. If I compare Paper 2 (which uses bilateral motion estimation) v/s motion vectors exported by mEstimate filter: $ tiny_psnr 60_source_2.yuv 60_mest-esa+obmc.yuv stddev:1.43 PSNR: 45.02 MAXDIFF: 17

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 4:33 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 09:54:15AM +, Davinder Singh wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 3:16 AM Michael Niedermayer > > > wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 08:19:00AM +, Davinder Singh wrote: > > > [...] > > > > Yes, I d

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 09:54:15AM +, Davinder Singh wrote: > On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 3:16 AM Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 08:19:00AM +, Davinder Singh wrote: > > [...] > > > Yes, I did that, after understanding it completely. It now works with the > > > moti

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 3:16 AM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 08:19:00AM +, Davinder Singh wrote: > [...] > > Yes, I did that, after understanding it completely. It now works with the > > motion vectors generated by mEstimate filter. Now I’m trying to improve > it > > b

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 11:45:51PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 08:19:00AM +, Davinder Singh wrote: [...] > Can i see your current "work in progress" ? I found https://github.com/dsmudhar/FFmpeg, i somehow wasnt aware of that repo even though you posted it in a p

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 08:19:00AM +, Davinder Singh wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:04 PM Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > > > Hi > > > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:43:38PM +, Davinder Singh wrote: > > > There’s a lot of research done on Motion Estimation. Depending upon the > > > inten

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:04 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:43:38PM +, Davinder Singh wrote: > > There’s a lot of research done on Motion Estimation. Depending upon the > > intended application of the resultant motion vectors, the method used for > > motion

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

Hi On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:43:38PM +, Davinder Singh wrote: > There’s a lot of research done on Motion Estimation. Depending upon the > intended application of the resultant motion vectors, the method used for > motion estimation can be very different. > > Classification of Motion Estimati

[FFmpeg-devel] [GSoC] Motion Interpolation

There’s a lot of research done on Motion Estimation. Depending upon the intended application of the resultant motion vectors, the method used for motion estimation can be very different. Classification of Motion Estimation Methods: Direct Methods: In direct methods we calculate optical flow