On 8/19/16, Davinder Singh <ds.mud...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 3:27 AM Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 8/18/16, Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On 8/18/16, Davinder Singh <ds.mud...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:52 PM Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> [...] >> >>> >> >> >> >> i tried to modify EPZS. i removed the early termination threshold which >> >> skip some predictors :-/ >> >> new score: >> >> $ tiny_psnr 60_source_2.yuv 60_bbb.yuv >> >> stddev: 1.02 PSNR: 47.94 MAXDIFF: 186 bytes:476928000/474163200 >> >> >> >> original epzs: >> >> $ tiny_psnr 60_source_2.yuv 60_bbb.yuv >> >> stddev: 1.07 PSNR: 47.51 MAXDIFF: 186 bytes:476928000/474163200 >> >> >> >> epzs uses small diamond pattern. a new pattern could also help. >> >> >> >> Please post patch like last time. >> >>> >> >> >> >> latest patch attached. >> >> >> > >> > UMH ME is still somehow buggy. >> > >> > EPZS seems good, great work! >> > > what epzs did that i couldn't be able to do with umh is, it fixed lot of > artifacts that require bigger search window. if i increase search param > with umh it increase the artifacts. same happen with esa. > i guess umh uses less predictors but a better search pattern. if we combine > both epzs and uhm, it should increase the quality further. > > >> Actually after second look EPZS is not much better than UMH here. >>
720p parkjoy sample looks fine with EPZS it seems. > > please give me link to the video that you tested. http://samples.ffmpeg.org/benchmark/testsuite1/matrixbench_mpeg2.mpg Too much dark scenes. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
