Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] 5 year plan & Inovation

2024-05-12 Thread Ondřej Fiala
On Sat May 4, 2024 at 9:05 PM CEST, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Sat, May 04, 2024 at 09:11:12AM +0800, flow gg wrote: > > [...] > > If you need to use git-send-email, I may not be able to submit any code > > If you do not need to use git-send-email, it is troublesome for the > > reviewer and th

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] 5 year plan & Inovation

2024-05-04 Thread Ondřej Fiala
On Sat May 4, 2024 at 3:11 AM CEST, flow gg wrote: > I have tried git-send-email, but it failed. You can say that I am stupid, > but I would say that this is because of various reasons such as my area and > the network. It is really not what I can solve. > Maybe I will spend a lot of energy trying

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] 5 year plan & Inovation

2024-05-04 Thread Ondřej Fiala
On Fri May 3, 2024 at 7:45 PM CEST, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > Le perjantaina 3. toukokuuta 2024, 20.30.16 EEST Ondřej Fiala a écrit : > > > You can't expect the whole community to accomodate your unwillingness to > > > run a web browser or update a ridiculous

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] 5 year plan & Inovation

2024-05-03 Thread Ondřej Fiala
On Fri May 3, 2024 at 4:41 PM CEST, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > Le perjantaina 3. toukokuuta 2024, 15.58.50 EEST Ondřej Fiala a écrit : > > > And in the end, I could be wrong, but I haven't seen you doing much code > > > review here. This is all about optimising the

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] 5 year plan & Inovation

2024-05-03 Thread Ondřej Fiala
On Fri May 3, 2024 at 7:46 AM CEST, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > > Since the Web and web > >browsers weren't meant for performing code review either. > > I was obviously and explicitly talking about Github and Gitlab web > applications, not the browsers. You're being ridiculous. By the way, speakin

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] 5 year plan & Inovation

2024-05-03 Thread Ondřej Fiala
On Thu May 2, 2024 at 10:06 PM CEST, epirat07 wrote: > On 2 May 2024, at 21:32, Ondřej Fiala wrote: > > Of course, the quality of your toolings matters a lot. If your email client > > can't pipe a bunch of emails to a shell command, it's not fit for being used > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] 5 year plan & Inovation

2024-05-03 Thread Ondřej Fiala
On Fri May 3, 2024 at 7:46 AM CEST, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > Le 2 mai 2024 22:32:16 GMT+03:00, "Ondřej Fiala" a écrit : > >On Thu May 2, 2024 at 4:38 PM CEST, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > >> Le torstaina 2. toukokuuta 2024, 17.25.06 EEST Ondřej Fiala a écrit : &g

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] 5 year plan & Inovation

2024-05-02 Thread Ondřej Fiala
On Thu May 2, 2024 at 7:44 PM CEST, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 10:35 AM Ondřej Fiala wrote: > > > [...] > > You will get similar selection bias anywhere else. Even if you handled > > such a conversation on a discussion site, the technology pow

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] 5 year plan & Inovation

2024-05-02 Thread Ondřej Fiala
On Thu May 2, 2024 at 4:38 PM CEST, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > Le torstaina 2. toukokuuta 2024, 17.25.06 EEST Ondřej Fiala a écrit : > > On Wed May 1, 2024 at 7:27 AM CEST, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > > > I don't use Gmail, and using email for review still sucks. No mat

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] 5 year plan & Inovation

2024-05-02 Thread Ondřej Fiala
On Thu May 2, 2024 at 4:20 PM CEST, Kieran Kunhya wrote: > > [...] > I feel it's a huge selection bias to have arguments about Gitlab vs Mailing > list handled on a mailing list. > > [...] You will get similar selection bias anywhere else. Even if you handled such a conversation on a discussion sit

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] 5 year plan & Inovation

2024-05-02 Thread Ondřej Fiala
On Wed May 1, 2024 at 7:27 AM CEST, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > Le 30 avril 2024 22:15:10 GMT+03:00, "Ondřej Fiala" a > écrit : > >On Tue Apr 30, 2024 at 9:06 PM CEST, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > >> I will take the replacement instead, thanks. Email is archaic. The &

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] 5 year plan & Inovation

2024-05-02 Thread Ondřej Fiala
On Wed May 1, 2024 at 1:01 AM CEST, Andrew Sayers wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 09:05:05PM +0200, Ondřej Fiala wrote: > > [...] > > IMHO, GitHub have improved that user experience significantly in recent years. > Yes you're still making a fork and pushing it, but the

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] 5 year plan & Inovation

2024-04-30 Thread Ondřej Fiala
On Tue Apr 30, 2024 at 9:06 PM CEST, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > I will take the replacement instead, thanks. Email is archaic. The > entire point is to get away from email, not dress it up. > SourceHut usage would likely make me even less interested then today. > > - Hendrik I guess that depends on h

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] 5 year plan & Inovation

2024-04-30 Thread Ondřej Fiala
On Mon Apr 29, 2024 at 9:04 PM CEST, Davy Durham wrote: > Presently do you not have to create an account on the devel mailing list to > contribute to ffmpeg? > > So on the flip side, I (actually) find it just as annoying to have to > create such accounts at every project rather than my having one a

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] 5 year plan & Inovation

2024-04-30 Thread Ondřej Fiala
On Tue Apr 30, 2024 at 2:11 AM CEST, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 6:44 PM Ondřej Fiala wrote: > > > > I would really suggest you look at SourceHut. > > While SourceHut might be a slight improvement over the current > situation (and only slight), it b

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] 5 year plan & Inovation

2024-04-29 Thread Ondřej Fiala
On Mon Apr 29, 2024 at 6:37 PM CEST, Ondřej Fiala wrote: > $ git format-patch master > $ git send-email ~username/project-de...@lists.sr.ht Should have checked what I'm writing. The second line should be $ git send-email --to ~username/project-de...@lists.sr.ht *.

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] 5 year plan & Inovation

2024-04-29 Thread Ondřej Fiala
On Mon Apr 29, 2024 at 8:03 AM CEST, Davy Durham wrote: > On 4/19/24 09:50, Niklas Haas wrote: > +1 from me too.  Please oh, please oh, /please/ modernize the patch > management.  I don't know what the opposition/inability to use github is > all about.  But gitlab should be a great improvement on

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] 5 year plan & Inovation

2024-04-27 Thread Ondřej Fiala
On Sat Apr 27, 2024 at 12:24 PM CEST, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > A phone originally was a tool to call and talk to someone, to be reachable by > voice communication. > Its not a tool to write letters, until it was > Its not a tool to browse the internet until it was > Its not an assitent you coul

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] 5 year plan & Inovation

2024-04-21 Thread Ondřej Fiala
On Fri Apr 19, 2024 at 12:45 AM CEST, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > a small change to trac is easy to do and easy to undo, if it helps, > iam not sure a switch to GitLab/Gitea/Forgejo will happen, or even if it is a > good idea. > > we lack people with time and interrest to review and apply patches

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Fwd: [PATCH] fftools/ffplay: split filters & show modes cycling into separate keys

2024-03-28 Thread Ondřej Fiala
Just want to make sure, since I am aware of some cases of large commercial email providers blocking my email provider... did anyone with a gmail address receive this patch? Thanks, Ondřej On Tue Mar 26, 2024 at 3:18 AM CET, Ondřej Fiala wrote: > I am forwarding a patch from December that se

[FFmpeg-devel] Fwd: [PATCH] fftools/ffplay: split filters & show modes cycling into separate keys

2024-03-25 Thread Ondřej Fiala
I am forwarding a patch from December that seems to have been overlooked. See the original threads in the archive: https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2023-December/318613.html https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2023-December/318654.html Forwarded message from Ondřej Fiala on Tue

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] fftools/ffplay: split filters & show modes cycling into separate keys

2023-12-20 Thread Ondřej Fiala
On Tue Dec 19, 2023 at 9:12 PM CET, Ondřej Fiala wrote: > ... > > diff --git a/fftools/ffplay.c b/fftools/ffplay.c > index 873ee8cc74..05182d9f49 100644 > --- a/fftools/ffplay.c > +++ b/fftools/ffplay.c > @@ -3370,14 +3370,11 @@ static void event_loop(VideoState *cur_stream

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] fftools/ffplay: split filters & show modes cycling into separate keys

2023-12-19 Thread Ondřej Fiala
Signed-off-by: Ondřej Fiala --- Simplified per Zhao Zhili's suggestion. doc/ffplay.texi | 5 - fftools/ffplay.c | 11 --- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/ffplay.texi b/doc/ffplay.texi index 93f77eeece..91d138a974 100644 --- a/doc/ffplay

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] fftools/ffplay: split filters & show modes cycling into separate keys

2023-12-18 Thread Ondřej Fiala
--- It's annoying to have to go through the audio visualization modes when you just want to switch back-and-forth between two video filters. It also makes the code simpler. doc/ffplay.texi | 5 - fftools/ffplay.c | 10 -- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git