On Tue Apr 30, 2024 at 2:11 AM CEST, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 6:44 PM Ondřej Fiala <ofi...@airmail.cc> wrote: > > > > I would really suggest you look at SourceHut. > > While SourceHut might be a slight improvement over the current > situation (and only slight), it being fundamentally still based on > email makes it inherit a lot of limitations and problems, and the > functionality of the web interface is severely lacking, as key > functions like commenting on patches are relegated back to your email > client. I think that's sort of the point, that you don't need a modern web browser to do code review. The web interface is meant to supplement email in the process, not replace it.
> Patch display functionality isn't any better then a mail client with a > bit of syntax highlighting, nevermind bespoke review tools that are > entirely absent, as it just sends you to your email client to respond. Personally I don't see much added value in GitHub's pull request model compared to inline comments on patches in an email thread, but I suppose that's probably not what you're comparing SourceHut against here. Perhaps you could list the "bespoke review tools" whose features you're missing explicitly? > At least thats what I see when checking the SourceHut instance of > SourceHut itself. > > As far as solutions go, this isn't one that I would imagine, I'm > afraid. It's essentially a mailing list with patchwork. We have that > now. I read someone complain that it's difficult to see which patches were accepted with patchwork. I didn't verify whether that's true, but it's certainly not an issue when using SourceHut. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
