On Fri Apr 19, 2024 at 12:45 AM CEST, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > a small change to trac is easy to do and easy to undo, if it helps, > iam not sure a switch to GitLab/Gitea/Forgejo will happen, or even if it is a > good idea. > > we lack people with time and interrest to review and apply patches > switching the tools will cost more time, and working > with these tools would also add burden (at least to me) > > other projects also seem not to have switched if i look at LKML for > example > > IMO, if we can keep the mailing list workflow and at the same time > provide people who prefer it a "in browser" way to interact with > patches, submit, approve and so on. That would be best. > It seems patchwork does not fully fill this role. > Can something be done to improve patchwork so it works better maybe ?
Have you looked at SourceHut[1]? Their stated goal is building a FLOSS forge that works on top of email rather than sidetracking it like GitHub & its clones do. The whole software can AFAIK be self-hosted and includes an in-browser git viewer, issue tracker[2], and mailing lists with decent support for patches[3]. [1] https://sourcehut.org/ [2] example: https://todo.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/hare [3] example: https://lists.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/sr.ht-dev/patches _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
