On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 10:18 -0400, Piotr Romanus wrote:
> I am running evo 2.22.3.1 on Ubuntu 8.04. This morning after starting
> Evo I have not been able to connect to the exchange server. It worked
> perfectly yesterday and I have not changed any configuration lately.
> So I started Evo from a t
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 10:18 -0400, Piotr Romanus wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 10:27 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
>
> > I don't really know what would be the best way to fix it. Maybe have
> > the subject line background a different color from the sender, instead
> >
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 13:35 -0400, Doctor Who wrote:
> I would obviously like to get *all* the mails back. What might be the
> issue here? I believe the exchange backend is 2003, but it may be
> 2000.
I believe this is an instance of bug 478151:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478151
On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 23:11 +0530, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> Is there a way to configure exchange address book in Evolution. I am
> running Evolution on Ubuntu 8.04 Linux
Sure. This is called the "Global Address List" in Exchange.
If you already have an account created for your Exchange mailbox,
On Thu, 2008-08-14 at 19:06 +0530, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> I am using Evolution 2.22.3.1 on Ubuntu 8.04 Desktop Linux,I could not
> see "Global Address List/Active Directory " option in Receiving
> Options tab.
As others have mentioned, your email account must be of type "exchange"
to access the
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 16:24 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> It's trivial to test. Create a backup and do:
>
> tar tvf backup.tar.gz
>
> to get a list of what's there.
Or, if you're not a CLI kind of guy, you can open it from the file
manager and take a look.
_
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 07:44 +1000, Ian Mortimer wrote:
> The last time I connected Evolution to Exchange was with 2.12.
> At that time it followed the Exchange model: deleted messages were
> moved to the "Deleted Items" folder.
This is indeed how it works: it uses the Exchange model. As far as
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 15:55 +0200, Valent Turkovic wrote:
> I tracked the issue and got a confirmation on irc that the port 135
> needs to be opened on corporate firewall in order for mapi-provider to
> work. I thought that ports 80 and 443 were enough because older
> evolution-exchange provider wo
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 08:23 +0200, Valent Turkovic wrote:
> >> The Evolution Exchange connector uses the Exchange Open Web Access (OWA)
> >> interface, which is essentially the Exchange webmail interface, to
> >> contact Exchange. Thus, to use the connector you need to have the Web
> >> ports open
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 12:15 +0200, Valent Turkovic wrote:
> I'm running Fedora 9 with Gnome 2.22.3 and Evolution 2.22.3.1
>
> Any suggestions? Can somebody help me troubuleshoot this issue?
I don't think you can use the MAPI provider with this version of
Evolution. That provider only works with
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 08:56 +0530, Suman Manjunath wrote:
> Paul, the MAPI provider RPMs in our repository[1] have been built for
> Fedora 8/9, openSUSE 10.3/11.0 :-)
That doesn't mean anything to me, since I don't use either Fedora or
OpenSUSE, but because you responded I'll assume that those ver
On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 21:39 +0200, Nigel Atherton wrote:
> When I send emails from my evolution client, I have my exchange
> account set up as the default. However, if I send emails from the
> evolution computer, they go to sent its in 'on this computer' and not
> sent items to the exchange accoun
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 11:06 -0400, Reid.Thompson wrote:
> Setting $EDITOR to "gvim -f" results in invocation
> failure.
Have you tried writing a script that runs gvim -f, then using that
script as $EDITOR?
I can't recall whether it's generally considered "OK" for $EDITOR to
contain any arguments;
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 20:23 +0200, Nigel Atherton wrote:
> So I purchased a laptop, put Ubuntu on it and loaded Evolution with
> the exchange connection.
>
> Problem is, the emails downloaded to evolution don't keep in sync with
> the exchange server. I spent today deleting and tidying up emails
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 20:43 +0200, Nigel Atherton wrote:
> Evolution version 2.22.3.1
>
> Ubuntu is fully patched and on hardy.
>
> The system has been working for about two months now. I haven't tried
> send and receive and after a while (about an hour) the email did seem
> to sync eventually.
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 11:15 -0700, MHR wrote:
> It would be REALLY nice if the list defaulted to sending replies to
> everyone on the list instead of the article sender, like most other
> email lists of this type.
First, this comes up every so often so it's worth it to look for
previous threads.
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 13:53 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I just use Ctrl-L (Message->Reply to List).
I just use "Reply to All".
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 11:36 -0700, MHR wrote:
> Interesting - I don't actually belong to too many email discussion
> lists, all them are technical, like this one, and all the others
> (CentOS, GNOME, rpmforge, OOo) use the reply-to-all as the default.
I belong to a LOT of GNU lists and none of the
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 14:18 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Reply-to-all and reply-to-list are not the same. Usually it doesn't
> matter, but as a rule I prefer to reply only on the list (and not via
> a cc) unless someone explicitly requests otherwise.
I know they're not the same but most mai
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 18:18 -0400, Brian Sammon wrote:
> > Nope, it's a PITA to you and some others, but it's absolutely the
> > preferred behavior for me and some others on this list. And, probably,
> > there are some who don't care one way or the other :-).
> >
> > FYI: http://www.unicom.com/pw
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 05:55 +0100, Alpár Jüttner wrote:
> > > And then follow it up with "reply to considered useful":
> > > http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml
> >
> > But you cannot forget the coupe de grace, "'Reply-To' Munging Still
> > Considered Harmful. Really."
> > http://wo
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 14:47 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> In 2.12 left clicking on an address opens up a new message, not a
> reply to the one you were reading. Don't know if it's different in
> 2.22.
Oh right. D'oh! Shouldn't post when I'm thinking about my soccer
(err... football for many of you
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 17:02 +0200, Nigel Atherton wrote:
> When I sent out the original email, the messages that had been deleted
> at work all still appeared in evolution.
>
> Much later (longer than an hour) the folder just magically seemed to
> update and remove the files that had been deleted.
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 10:02 -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 20:32 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> > I just checked and the MA Ubuntu user's group list also doesn't set
> > reply-to
> If you are referring to a Massachusetts Loco group list, I can tell
&g
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 17:51 +0200, Nigel Atherton wrote:
> sorry for only reverting now.
>
> I have tried the send receive. It took a good half hour to finish and
> did not solve the problem.
That's not good. Does it do this only the first time, or every time you
press Send/Receive? The first
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 14:58 -0500, Bunny Henry wrote:
> Whenever I reply-to-all, the first address in the original TO list
> remains in the TO field and all the other addresses are removed to the
> CC field. Why? How can this be corrected?I expected that all
> addresses in the TO field should
On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 08:11 -0400, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> A while back Evolution lost this feature. It appears that all
> searches are now by subject or sender only.
In my version (2.22) you can still do all those things. In the search
field there is an icon with a magnifying glass. Click it and
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 00:50 -0400, jim wrote:
> Thanks Patrick. I may end up making this icon myself as it seems to
> lock up all the time for me. Does anyone have any explanations or
> solution to this Evolution instability??
I've had this a few releases ago, but since Evo 2.20 and especially 2.2
On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 10:26 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Can you explain how mail gets to external destinations, such as this
> list, if a) your firewall blocks external SMTP from your machine, and
> b) Exchange doesn't "offer" SMTP? (I'm not sure what you mean by
> "offer").
If you have an
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 20:33 -0500, 1620 user wrote:
> How do I edit the 'from' line when creating a new message (short of
> going thru the hassle of adding a new account).
You can't.
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.g
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 10:35 -0800, David Graves wrote:
> Pretty please, with sugar on top, update the fscking folder once in a
> while
I'm not saying that you're wrong but FYI the way I have developed to
keep this from burning me is:
I go through my Junk folder regularly, including before I l
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 15:27 +0100, William John Murray wrote:
> > You haven't said how you retrieve mail from the server: pop, imap,
> > exchange??
>Sorry...exchange connector.
If you really do mean Exchange rather than IMAP, then FYI I've never
gotten junk mail filtering to work properly wit
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 15:54 -0500, Reid Thompson wrote:
> Appears to be a bug to me ( running SVN head via Exchange OWA ). I get
> the same results. Any email that i mark as Junk becomes invisible to
> evo and does not show up in a search folder defined to display emails
> with status Junk.
I se
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 09:05 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On 03/02/09 02:20, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> > That's why I have some dozen or more bugs filed.
>
> Doesn't it occur to you that giving actual references to these bugs
> would add weight to your message?
I agree; when I was trying t
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 16:09 +1100, Nick Jenkins wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A few weeks ago, I read how on this list how someone (maybe poc?) used
> to post their list of Evolution bugs that annoyed them, with their bug
> numbers / bugzilla links.
I think you're thinking of me.
I think this is useful a
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 18:01 +0800, Daniel.Li wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 17:59 +0800, Daniel.Li wrote:
> > Thanks, I can't wait to see 2.26.0 release. Common fellows, I have
> > seen 2.25.91 unstable version. :)
>
> Come on, fellows. Sorry about typo :(
> >
> > Hope to hear the good news soon:
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 13:12 -0400, Sal Valente wrote:
> When I see an old message in some folder other than the Junk folder, I
> know that one of three things has happened. Either:
>
> 1. bogofilter said the message was 100% ham, and the message was
> learned.
> 2. bogofilter said the message was
Hi; my company switched from Exchange 2003 to 2007 in December (just a
few months too early... drat!) and I simply don't have time to do the
from-source building right now. I've been using Outlook via Crossover
Linux but I've gotten so fed up with it that now I'm using it only for
calendaring and
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 06:28 -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
> I highly doubt it will make it into 8.10, but perhaps 9.04.
>
> If it doesn't, I may set up a PPA myself, assuming I can get support
> getting it compiled.
Ubuntu never backports major releases like this to earlier versions.
Heck, often the
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 17:14 +0200, Thomas Novin wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have experienced two major bugs with evolution-mapi in Ubuntu Jaunty.
>
> The Calendar doesn't work at all
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=577333
>
> Can't see any Contacts
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?i
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 18:45 +0200, Oliver Horn wrote:
> > Trash is done the way it is because that's how IMAP is defined. Deletion
> > of a message is done in two stages, a) mark the message as \Deleted, b)
> > at some later date Expunge the folder. Other mailers do this
> > differently, mainly bec
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 10:42 -0500, Sandro Taglione wrote:
> I want to quit this list.
>
> Evolution-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Go to the link here. Look at the bottom of the page. It says:
> To unsubscribe from Evolution-list, get a password reminde
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 13:11 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> > How to teach Nautilus about that? Saving the file it becomes a pdf-file
> > as all other .pdfs? An example is application/acrobat (file.pdf)
> > I have not found of anything about attachments in Nautilus.
>
> See http://mail.gnome.org/ar
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 14:27 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 14:21 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 13:11 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> > > > How to teach Nautilus about that? Saving the file it becomes a pdf-file
> > > >
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 20:42 +0200, Frédéric SOSSON wrote:
> My plateform is Ubuntu 9.04, I compiled Evolution 2.26.2 through
> dpkg-buildpackage using "debian" folder from Evolution 2.26.0 source
> package provided in Ubuntu 9.04.
>
> When I say "it crashes" I mean that the window configuration
>
> 2009/7/9 Johnny Jacob :
> > On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 16:26 +0200, Frédéric SOSSON wrote:
> >> This is the output from the console:
> >>
> >> ** (evolution:4482): DEBUG: Loading Exchange MAPI Plugin
> >>
> >> ** (evolution:4482): DEBUG: MAPI listener is constructed with 0 listed
> >> MAPI accounts
>
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 18:12 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Attached is a patch which changes the Makefile v2.12 from
> http://mad-scientist.us/evolution.html so that it checks out sources
> from the new git.gnome.org instead of the obsolete svn.gnome.org.
>
> I've checked a few situation
Hi all;
I'm trying to create a new Address Book in Evolution (I've tried both
2.26 and 2.27.92) which attaches to my Exchange server using LDAP. I
was able to get this to work in Thunderbird on Linux so it could in
theory work.
When I try it in Evolution, though, I am not able to resolve any
sea
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 09:19 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Either upgrade Ubuntu, or compile Evo from source. Paul Smith has a page
> which should help you compile for Ubuntu:
> http://mad-scientist.us/evolution.html
Just a note that my makefile is woefully out of date... for
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 08:47 -0500, Barbara Tobias wrote:
> Is there a way to have the update manager automatically download the
> latest stable release of Evolution when it is doing other updates? I am
> using Evolution 2.26.1 under Ubuntu Linux 9.04. I'm also relatively new
> to Linux and not v
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 18:14 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> > I'm probably going to be upgrading within the next 30 days.
> > I've been considering Ubuntu 9.04. Any suggestions?
>
> Within the next 30 days ? Wait for Ubuntu 9.10, this one will come with
> LTS (Long Term Support), and apparently that
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 11:12 -0700, bg wrote:
> > what specs does your box have?
>
> Athlon 2.6 with 1Gb RAM, 160Gb RAID Level 1 array.
>
> I've been experimenting with Ubuntu 8.10 on another machine.
> One of the things that both looks attractive about Ubuntu,
> and also generates a bit of appreh
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 15:01 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
> if you recall offhand the steps, i'd appreciate a quick posting of how
> to configure it to work the old way.. if you have to think more than
> a min for the steps don't bother, i'll figure it out/google it
No problem. It's a bit non-obvi
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 16:21 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > Also, when mentioning a BZ report here on the list it's conventional to
> > give the bug number (or better, the URL of the BZ page) in case someone
> > wants to add anything.
>
> Also quite right. It's bug 528393.
> https://bugz
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 21:56 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 23:42 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > If you mean http://bugzilla.gnome.org (which is where you need to create
> > a login to report bugs and enhancement requests such as this one), what
> > exactly is the prob
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 01:57 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 00:48 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> > Most importantly, you MUST always describe your environment
> > completely:
> > for Evo in particular this means what type of email are you reading?
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 15:02 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> I have a neat little script which I use to get stack
> traces:
Good stuff! I modified it to just display the output on stdout, then I
can put it where I want it by hand.
Just a note: if you add "set pagination off" to your GDB script,
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 11:11 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 11:43 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 15:02 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> > > I have a neat little script which I use to get stack
> > > traces:
> >
>
Hi all.
Thanks to help from Patrick and a few others, I have a new version of my
makefile to build Evolution from source, that works with the new GIT
repositories. It currently builds the latest content of the gnome-2.28
GIT branch (I didn't try the MASTER branch since I think it's unstable
due t
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:02 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> ... They responded that that wasn't
> really the idea, since the poster is meant to edit the quote (removing
> irrelevant material and inserting comments) and that's easier to do from
> the top down. Nevertheless they did agree to incl
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 12:44 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
> > I hope Paul was talking about MAPI calendars only, not about all remote
> > calendars. Both need an investigation for sure, as for me the MAPI
> > calendar seems to fetch and show some items and I can create an item
> > there as well. And
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 13:55 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
> I can also successfully
> configure an LDAP lookup against our Exchange server.
Hm. I've not been able to get LDAP connections working for our Exchange
server. Can you give me any hints as to how you did it?
_
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 20:00 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> > Note if you guys are able to connect to OWA, it means your Exchange
> > server is Exchange 2003 or earlier. I hope that Milan, at least, has
> > access to an Exchange 2007 server to do testing;
>
> Even I can on both, then I tried this on 2
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 14:37 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
> search base OU= Users,DC=,DC=com
> search scope Sub
> search filter (objectclass=person)
Thanks, this was REALLY helpful. I had to use "CN=Users, DC=,
DC=com" for the base. I also changed the scope to be "one" because it
seems faster
agnostic text
to your system administrator.
Then there are some headers attached, and the destination header has a
bizarre format, like this:
From: Paul Smith
To: psmith
I pretty much can't use Evo with MAPI if I can't send email :-/.
A few othe
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 03:21 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> Here's the killer: I cannot SEND any email. Every email I try to send
> is bounced back to me with an error like this for each recipient:
More info here: if I send to an external address, such as my home
address, then the mail i
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 14:00 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> The composer of Evo breaks (correctly) on insert of text around column
> 72; sometimes I want to insert longer lines and not want to have them
> broken, for example lines of log files or compiler output,...
>
> How could this be done?
Cha
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 15:17 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> maybe try http://davmail.sourceforge.net/
That looks interesting. Does anyone have any instructions for using
this with Evolution? I tried to configure each of Mail, Calendar, and
LDAP with DavMail, and was unsuccessful for all of them. It
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 19:21 +, Art Alexion wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 15:01 -0400, Milan Crha wrote:
> > I've configured an OWA URL in DavMail as this:
> >https://exchange2007.example.com/owa
>
> However, the above url is not working.
Heh. Just in case you're not kidding, I think Mil
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 16:05 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> It's not the OS, it's the distribution that's the issue - we all
> (mostly) run the same OS, i.e. Linux! (OK, I know there's some BSDers
> and Windows users out there - but you know what I mean.)
>
> But there does seem to be more problems wit
On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 22:22 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> I haven't touched my Buntu install for ages, so I have no idea what
> version Karmic has. You should check, and lobby for 2.28.1 if you have
> to.
Karmic has 2.28.1.
I've also updated my makefile for building code from the Gnome sources
so it
The answer is "definitely not: run far far away"...
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=600600
:-(
I used the Exchange OWA backend for years and it was great. This new
one is definitely not ready for prime time yet.
___
Evolution-list mailing
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 16:08 -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> The answer is "definitely not: run far far away"...
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=600600
>
> :-(
>
> I used the Exchange OWA backend for years and it was great. This new
> one is defin
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 13:29 -0700, Capehart, William J wrote:
> I've just started experimenting with the Exchange 2008 mapi w/
> Evolution and while the setup was a breeze, I have two problems with
> the Calendar component.
>
> 1) my recurring appointments do not show up.
>
> 2) More importantl
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 14:07 -0800, Bryan Karlan wrote:
> I want to try 2.29 to see what it has improved upon. I have little
> experience with Linux. I have Ubuntu 9.10. I have downloaded the
> file and have extracted it. However, I find no install or setup file
> as you would in Windows. I sti
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 13:38 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> My *personal* opinion is that there seems to be so many problems and
> restrictions with evo-mapi and so many ways that DavMail succeeds when
> evo-mapi doesn't that the developers should look closely at
> integrating DavMail into Evo - perhaps
On Sat, 2010-01-02 at 15:12 -0800, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> I use spamassasin to check for junk (local tests only). Suddenly I'm
> getting lots of good messages in the Junk folder, usually about 40 per
> day (I'm on a lot of mailing lists (8-)). There have always been some
> misfiled good messag
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 14:23 -0500, Philippe LeCavalier wrote:
> As of Evo 2.28 I can't drag and drop message attachments from the
> preview pane to the compose window. In 2.28.1 Evo simply ignored the
> action. But since my last update (I still have Evo 2.28.1 but I
> imagine some libraries have ch
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 14:23 -0500, Philippe LeCavalier wrote:
> As of Evo 2.28 I can't drag and drop message attachments from the
> preview pane to the compose window. In 2.28.1 Evo simply ignored the
> action.
FYI, (this is mainly if any evo-hackers are reading this) if I try to
reply to Philippe
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 19:06 -0500, James Pifer wrote:
> One problem I'm having is searching multiple address books when
> composing email. I have several local address books and one that uses
> ldap. How can I get evolution to search all my address books when
> composing mail? Right now it seems to
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 14:04 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 12:51 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > But changing the footer to "To change your settings or unsubscribe..."
> > will at least make the ire even more justified [it won't actually help,
> > they still won't read i
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 07:52 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> Paul Smith wrote up a custom Makefile to automate most of the process
> of building Evolution from git. See
> http://mad-scientist.net/evolution.html
I've been working to get this going with Karmic (don't have Lucid
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 02:31 +0200, Thomas Mittelstaedt wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 29.04.2010, 10:03 -0400 schrieb Reid Thompson:
> > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 09:29:40AM -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 07:52 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> &
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 21:57 +0200, Thomas Mittelstaedt wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 11.05.2010, 17:21 +0100 schrieb Dianne Reuby:
> > > I'm running Evo 2.28.3 on Ubuntu 10.04
>
> As far as I know, the latest version of evolution on ubuntu 10.04 ist
> 2.30.xx, not 2.28.3.
This is not true. The Ubunt
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 23:32 -0400, Christopher Koeber wrote:
> I am trying to connect my instance of Evolution (running on Gentoo) to
> Microsoft Exchange Server (running the 2007 version).
Evolution's OWA support only works with Exchange 2003. It does not work
with Exchange 2007.
The only way t
o try it for yourself, though: it must work to some
extent for some people.
> From: Paul Smith [mailto:p...@mad-scientist.net]
> The only way to connnect to an Exchange 2007 server with Evolution 2.26 is
> to configure MAPI on the Exchange server and use that--obviously you get no
&
On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 13:43 -0400, Jerry LeVan wrote:
> I have an Exchange Account at the University where I retired from.
>
> There is a owa web interface and I can specify my username and
> password on the 'initial page' of owa and log into my account.
> What sort of questions should I ask the h
On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 17:09 -0400, Jerry LeVan wrote:
> They are running Exchange 2007. I am currently using IMAP and it works
> but I have to send email through my ISP.
I'm not sure why that would be: is it because your server admins don't
allow sending mail via IMAP? I can send mail via IMAP to
On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 18:19 -0400, Jerry LeVan wrote:
> I tried all of the servers I could think of and was never able to
> authenticate using the evolution-mapi backend...
What version of Evolution are you using?
There were some issues with some older, broken versions that required
you to use th
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 06:45 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> IMAP is for reading mail, SMTP is for sending (most likely). I've not
> heard of IMAP being useable for sending email.
Yes, you're right. What I meant was that my exchange server allows
sending mail as well, using normal SMTP, not requiring MA
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 08:26 +0800, William Kenworthy wrote:
> Ive never been able to get evolution mapi or evolution exchange
> working to exchange 2003! - evo ver 2.26, I have just upgraded to
> gnome 2.28 and will retry it again soon, but dont hold out much hope.
As of Gnome 2.22 and later I had
On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 18:14 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I just upgraded from Fedora 12 to Fedora 13, which brings in Evolution
> 2.30. So far so good, but who decided to make the icons for Delete and
> Junk nearly identical? This slows me down every time because I can't
> remember which is
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 10:49 -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
> DavMail works well with 2007 & evolution if you don't want to use
> lookout. Lookout 2007 is admittedly bloated, but seems to have a
> superior interface to any prior version. I run it for group
> calendaring under VirtualBox.
I tried DavMa
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 13:27 -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 11:13 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> > I tried DavMail last fall for about 30m and couldn't get it working
> > right so I gave up--too quickly I admit. Maybe I'll give it another
> > go.
>
Hi all. I'm trying to get Evo 2.30.2 (latest gnome-2.30 git branch
code) working with DavMail to my Exchange 2003 server. I'm making
progress but these are two major issues I'm having. The first one
is that whenever I send email, it takes a couple of minutes to "go
through".
I have tried sendin
I've had to give up on DavMail. It seemed OK at the start, but there
are far too many problems.
I can't get the IMAP interface through DavMail working properly at all.
I'm constantly getting errors from DavMail with things like "B4 BAD
unable to handle request: Unable to update message proper
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 16:18 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > So how would you get Reply to Author if it _is_ a list message?
> >
> > Message->Reply To Author
>
> That's a *really* bad idea. The standard reply button and Ctrl-R should
> give a *private* reply. Changing that to suddenly send *pu
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 17:30 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > You could add a third button, I suppose... but then why bother making
> > it change to 'Reply to All' for non-list messages, when there's an
> > existing 'Reply to All' button right next to it? (As there is in the
> > Message menu).
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 18:34 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Ctrl-R: Uses the Reply-To: header if valid, else the From: header.
> Ctrl-Shift-R: Uses the same as Ctrl-R, and adds the Cc: recipients.
> Ctrl-L: Uses the List-Post: header if valid, else same as Ctrl-Shift-R.
I feel like I'm trailing
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 16:20 -0400, George Reeke wrote:
> I've been trying to follow all this but am missing a key concept--
> could someone just tell me and anybody else who doesn't already know:
> what is a "munged list"?
A "munged list" is one where the mailing list software resets the
Reply-To:
301 - 400 of 431 matches
Mail list logo
