Re: [Evolution] High disk usage

On Mon, 2022-10-10 at 20:04 +0200, Pelle Windestam via evolution-list wrote: > On Mon, 2022-10-10 at 09:59 -0500, Greg Oliver via evolution-list > wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 5:46 AM Pelle Windestam via evolution-list > > wrote: > > > On Mon, 2022-10-10 at 11:36 +0200, Milan Crha via evolut

Re: [Evolution] High disk usage

On Tue, 2022-10-11 at 20:26 +0200, Pelle Windestam via evolution-list wrote: > > Hi, > > can the received messages be large, like with some attachments or > > inline images? Check size of those directories under ~/.cache/, > > where > > the folders.db files are stored. Then you can check th

Re: [Evolution] How do you retroactively train Bogofilter's spam / ham filters on multiple computers using existing messages (on an IMAP account)?

On Fri, 2022-10-14 at 09:34 -0400, Jeff via evolution-list wrote: > I see! > Thank you very much for the confirmation that I can simply sync the > Bogofilter wordlist file, and the "insert an unmarked message into > the > email folder" training workaround (if I ever need to re-train the > whole > t

Re: [Evolution] Mailing list?

On Sat, 2022-10-15 at 22:55 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > Personally, I wish I could turn off users doing Reply-all to mailing > lists. I'd vote for that. In fact it wouldn't appear to be hard to do. If Evolution sees that the replied-to message has the appropriate list headers, it could simply turn

Re: [Evolution] Announcement: this mailing list will be retired by the end of Oct 2022

On Thu, 2022-10-20 at 13:09 +0200, Andrea Veri wrote: > Hi, > > As we have been communicating during the past few months GNOME's > Mailman > platform is being decommissioned (python2 deprecation, major burden > in > managing lists spam). The deadline is currently set to the end of > October > 2022

Re: [Evolution] What do I do now?

On Thu, 2022-10-20 at 11:38 -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > If we don't all find an alternate way to communicate with each other > during October, > many of us will be unable to use discourse (does it depend on systemd > or pulseaudio, > for instance, because I don't have those, don't want them, and I'm

Re: [Evolution] Announcement: this mailing list will be retired by the end of Oct 2022

On Thu, 2022-10-20 at 19:10 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > I am a moderator of the Evolution list, and this is the first I've > > heard of this. I think that 10 days notice of such a radical change > > is > > not reasonable. Most people here, including myself, will have no > > idea > > what this

Re: [Evolution] Announcement: this mailing list will be retired by the end of Oct 2022

On Thu, 2022-10-20 at 22:44 +0200, Andrea Veri wrote: > And it seems I forgot both [1] and [2], there you go. > > [1] > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2022-August/msg4.html > [2] > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2022-September/msg00018.html > > On Thu,

Re: [Evolution] Announcement: this mailing list will be retired by the end of Oct 2022

On Thu, 2022-10-20 at 23:03 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > Have you ever read "Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy"? You took the words out of my mouth. For those who don't get the reference: “But Mr Dent, the plans have been available in the local planning office for the last nine months.” “Oh yes, we

Re: [Evolution] Announcement: this mailing list will be retired by the end of Oct 2022

On Fri, 2022-10-21 at 11:27 +0200, Andrea Veri wrote: > > One glaring omission in [1] and [2] is *this* *list*. Are you > > expecting > > everyone on this list to also be on the Gnome devel and foundation > > lists? Many people who use this list don't even use Gnome, have no > > interest in Gnome,

Re: [Evolution] Automatic tagging as "important"

On Fri, 2022-10-21 at 09:07 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > On Thu, 2022-10-20 at 17:33 -0500, Tim McConnell via evolution-list > wrote: > > On Thu, 2022-10-20 at 23:10 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > No, there's no headers like that. I was wondering if there is > > > some > > > logic somewhere that pars

Re: [Evolution] Announcement: this mailing list will be retired by the end of Oct 2022

On Fri, 2022-10-21 at 09:50 +, Sorin Srbu via evolution-list wrote: > Ah, seems like Discourse closes topics after fourteen days with no > traffic. > Might this be a problem when revisiting the same topic but later? > One can create a new topic of course, and refer to the old one, but > this >

Re: [Evolution] My first attempt to migrate to Discourse

On Fri, 2022-10-21 at 13:29 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list wrote: > 18. I muted the bell icon. I've got no idea how to continue to > subscribe >     to a mailing list behaviour, let alone that I still would have to >     change the GitHub mail account for Discourse to my Evolution >     mai

Re: [Evolution] What do I do now?

On Fri, 2022-10-21 at 13:00 +0100, ja wrote: > > Using Chrome. > > Try starting typing evolution in the Watched field. Evolution > > should show > > up; it did for me. > > > > > Yes that was it - type it in! > The window is only active when the list is pulled down! > > Also received the same ans

Re: [Evolution] Announcement: this mailing list will be retired by the end of Oct 2022

On Fri, 2022-10-21 at 14:10 +0200, Andrea Veri wrote: > That's about correct, and I see where that can be seen as a > limitation. You > can only filter by category in the way that you're mentioning AFAIK. > One > way would be to include an [Evolution] or [$APP] tag in the subject > line > and filte

Re: [Evolution] Announcement: this mailing list will be retired by the end of Oct 2022

On Fri, 2022-10-21 at 20:04 -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > Brewster Gillett said on Fri, 21 Oct 2022 09:50:24 -0700 > > > > Excellent question. I'll toss out this possibility: > > > > > > > > We're using groups.io for a couple of the Mensa discussion lists > > I'm > > on. Mostl

Re: [Evolution] What do I do now?

On Fri, 2022-10-21 at 14:02 +0100, Mark Stanton wrote: > On Fri, 2022-10-21 at 14:09 +0200, Jaroslaw Rafa via evolution-list > wrote: > > Dnia 21.10.2022 o godz. 13:04:15 Patrick O'Callaghan pisze: > > > > > > It seems to take some time. I suspect Discourse

Re: [Evolution] What do I do now?

On Sat, 2022-10-22 at 08:50 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > On Sat, 2022-10-22 at 13:42 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > I seem to be getting them now. Trouble is, I'm also getting stuff > > that has absolutely nothing to do with Evolution, despite having > > set >

Re: [Evolution] Announcement: this mailing list will be retired by the end of Oct 2022

On Sat, 2022-10-22 at 09:53 -0500, Anonymous Japhering via evolution- list wrote: > The free level only allows up to 100 members -- how many folks are in > the current list? Around 850 at the moment. > All levels have restrictions on archive size:  1GB, 30GB, 1TB. Anyone > know how big, size wise

Re: [Evolution] Thoughts on Discourse and use as a mailing list

On Sat, 2022-10-22 at 19:51 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list wrote: > On Sat, 2022-10-22 at 17:36 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > > First, a thought about the demise of the Mailman mailing list. > > A while back FreeBSD migrated from Mailman to another Software and > the > still provide the old M

Re: [Evolution] Thoughts on Discourse and use as a mailing list

On Sat, 2022-10-22 at 17:36 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > I thought I would put together some of my thoughts about using > Discourse that I have gained in just a day of using it. A day is not > very long and I may not have fully understood everything - but there > again, I am, apparently, the top post

Re: [Evolution] Discourse and the situation for Mailman lists hosted by Gnome.org

On Sun, 2022-10-23 at 13:13 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > On Sun, 2022-10-23 at 13:45 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list > wrote: > > On Sun, 2022-10-23 at 12:31 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > The PTB would all say that this is not abrupt. > >   ^^^ > >   Pass the bong :D > > > > What is

Re: [Evolution] Discourse and the situation for Mailman lists hosted by Gnome.org

On Sun, 2022-10-23 at 15:35 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > > I have worked with a number of professional organizations that are > > maintained primarily by volunteer staff and effort.  The "powers > > that > > be" are usually people who are doing a lot of work for free -- even > > if > > the people at

Re: [Evolution] Discourse and the situation for Mailman lists hosted by Gnome.org

On Sun, 2022-10-23 at 16:40 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sun, 2022-10-23 at 15:35 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > I have worked with a number of professional organizations that > > > are > > > maintained primarily by volunteer staff and effort.  T

Re: [Evolution] Let's unite the power of all mailing list subscribers who are affected by GNOME's ruling

On Sun, 2022-10-23 at 17:57 +0200, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: > * Google Groups - free, no positive / negative experience I briefly used Google Groups a long time ago, though I think it has changed since then. They do offer a fairly broad range of facilities, including email access, admin and moderato

Re: [Evolution] [Gimp-user] Let's unite the power of all mailing list subscribers who are affected by GNOME's ruling

On Sun, 2022-10-23 at 14:49 -0500, Daniel Smith via evolution-list wrote: > Here’s another article about it. My experience is they have a very > wide > vest amount of information there. I think it personally it would be a > good > idea to put your list there because a lot of people from other > tec

Re: [Evolution] [rebellion attempt] Fight back!

On Mon, 2022-10-24 at 08:25 +, Werner LEMBERG via evolution-list wrote: > > > a lot of the Evolution mailing list members, including myself, > > tested the mailing list ability of Discourse. I was not allowed to > > start a new thread by email, because my gamification level was 0. > > You are

Re: [Evolution] Let's unite the power of all mailing list subscribers who are affected by GNOME's ruling

On Mon, 2022-10-24 at 14:11 +0200, Jaroslaw Rafa via evolution-list wrote: > Dnia 24.10.2022 o godz. 12:49:00 Patrick O'Callaghan pisze: > > > > I briefly used Google Groups a long time ago, though I think it has > > changed since then. They do offer a fairly bro

Re: [Evolution] Let's unite the power of all mailing list subscribers who are affected by GNOME's ruling

On Mon, 2022-10-24 at 09:30 -0400, Matt Connell wrote: > On Mon, 2022-10-24 at 14:11 +0200, Jaroslaw Rafa via evolution-list > wrote: > > Dnia 24.10.2022 o godz. 12:49:00 Patrick O'Callaghan pisze: > > > > > > I briefly used Google Groups a long time ago, though

Re: [Evolution] Let's unite the power of all mailing list subscribers who are affected by GNOME's ruling

On Mon, 2022-10-24 at 07:46 -0700, Brewster Gillett wrote: > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > I briefly used Google Groups a long time ago, though I think it has > > changed since then. They do offer a fairly broad range of > > facilities, > > including email access

Re: [Evolution] Announcement: this mailing list will be retired by the end of Oct 2022

On Tue, 2022-10-25 at 18:59 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list wrote: > On Tue, 2022-10-25 at 18:26 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list > wrote: > > My personal opinion is to use a free mailing list service. > > Expecting > > there will be people not moving to the new location, thus the > > lo

Re: [Evolution] Announcement: this mailing list will be retired by the end of Oct 2022

On Tue, 2022-10-25 at 18:26 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > On Thu, 2022-10-20 at 13:09 +0200, Andrea Veri wrote: > > After the deadline of the end of October Mailman archives will > > remain > > alive in read only mode for posterity. If the mailing list was used > > behind an alias,

Re: [Evolution] Announcement: this mailing list will be retired by the end of Oct 2022

On Wed, 2022-10-26 at 07:34 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > On Tue, 2022-10-25 at 22:23 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > Can you ask them? Probably better not to have several people asking > > the same questions. > > Hi, > I can ask Da

Re: [Evolution] Announcement: this mailing list will be retired by the end of Oct 2022

On Fri, 2022-10-21 at 13:09 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > They do, an example set of headers from one of the replies I got > > recently: > > > > Reply-To: GNOME Discourse > > <03e7e14d32e53136f623f8ab8e9...@discourse.gnome.org> > > Message-ID: > > > > References: > > The threading informati

Re: [Evolution] Announcement: this mailing list will be retired by the end of Oct 2022

On Wed, 2022-10-26 at 12:29 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > On Wed, 2022-10-26 at 11:13 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > My personal opinion is that the Freedesktop site looks more > > promising, purely in terms of the number of lists they host > >    

Re: [Evolution] How to include pre-made custom headers in outgoing mail?

On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 23:11 -0700, Per wrote: > ​Aha, I see that while the Message-id header is changed each time, the > References header 'references' all previous Message-id values, in this > format: > > References: > ​ > That should work as long as your correspondents respect threading stand

Re: [Evolution] [Bulk] Fast full-text search of e-mails?

On 3 November 2014 16:36, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > I doubt there is a MUA that is going to nicely handle full-text search > of very large mailboxes. > Actually there is at least one: Gmail. But of course that has other baggage which not everyone wants. Personally I use Gmail via IMAP on Evo

Re: [Evolution] [Bulk] Fast full-text search of e-mails?

On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 13:10 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > IMAP SEARCH doesn't work? Why ask me? The search issue was brought up by someone else who appears to be having trouble with it. However, since you ask, I tested a full body search on the string "ews" over the entire account where I r

Re: [Evolution] [Bulk] Fast full-text search of e-mails?

On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 06:39 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 00:05 +0000, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 13:10 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > > IMAP SEARCH doesn't work? > > Why ask me? > > You are th

Re: [Evolution] [Bulk] Fast full-text search of e-mails?

On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 07:34 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 21:41 +0000, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 06:39 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > > So either > > > (a) Evolution did not ask the server to do the searc

Re: [Evolution] [Bulk] Fast full-text search of e-mails?

On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 16:43 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > I think it depends on the search itself, but the IMAPx tries to > search > > as much on the server as it can. Searching in summary headers is > left > > for a local search, of course. > > Inter

Re: [Evolution] Not able to send mail using EWS?

On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 12:46 +0100, Bjørn T Johansen wrote: > Just installed Evolution with EWS plugin to connect to our Exchange server > and I see all my folder en can read email, both old and new. > But I can not send any emails, I just get an error after a long time, telling > me that it could

Re: [Evolution] Not able to send mail using EWS?

On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 13:34 +0100, Bjørn T Johansen wrote: > Yes, I know it is a test version, that's why I asked if this was a > known problem with that version... When you said it was "the latest version", it wasn't clear that you understood it's not released or supported. I was merely clarifyin

Re: [Evolution] FOREIGN KEY constraint failed

On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 09:35 +1100, Araluen wrote: > Any suggestions? Yes, the same suggestion I give everyone who wants to ask a question here. Help people to help you by stating what version of Evolution you have. The fact that's on Debian is largely irrelevant but the version information is not.

Re: [Evolution] FOREIGN KEY constraint failed 3.12.7

On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 22:15 -0500, Daye Liu wrote: > Second that this problem had been observed for a while. > Evolution 3.12.7 under Fedora 21. > Would be glad to provide any related information. Please respect threading if referring to some previous post. It's also useful to quote the relevant p

Re: [Evolution] Evolution performance bottleneck

On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 14:16 -0800, N B Day wrote: > It has all worked very well for > me since I installed spamassassin (which doesn't get installed by > default for some reason). It's not installed by default because there are other anti-spam tools, including Bogofilter which I personally prefer

Re: [Evolution] Fedora 20 - Evolution - Gnome gui freezes

On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 17:27 -0600, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > -Original Message- > From: Pete Biggs > To: evolution-list@gnome.org > Subject: Re: [Evolution] Fedora 20 - Evolution - Gnome gui freezes > Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 22:51:00 + > > > > > Sorry to ask a beginner question her

Re: [Evolution] [Bulk] Re: Evolution performance bottleneck

On Thu, 2014-11-13 at 06:49 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > PS: Since we are writing about quoting styles in another thread. The > footnote usually isn't automatically quoted and shouldn't be quoted. +1 poc ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@g

Re: [Evolution] Evo freezes during rendering of very large messages

On Fri, 2014-11-14 at 09:29 -0800, Per wrote: > Evo 3.10.4 > > I receive some very large log files by email (text format, logs in email > body). > > When I click to select/view the message, Evo CPU usage jumps and then > becomes unresponsive (did not have patience to wait > 5 min). Evo has to be

[Evolution] Keyring problems (again)

Problems with Evo and keyrings seem to pop up from time to time. I haven't had any for quite a while so I guess this was about due. This is Evo 3.10.4 on Fedora 20. I'm running KDE 4.14 for what it's worth. I haven't changed any part of my Evo configuration in several months, though I do update my

Re: [Evolution] Keyring problems (again)

On 18 November 2014 22:33, Bart wrote: > 'm using openSuse 13.1 with Evo 3.10.4 and KDE only 4.11 and am also > using the Gnome keyring. I do not have this problem. I also have Gnome > installed and still do not see the problem UNLESS my mail server is > unreachable for whatever reason. > My m

Re: [Evolution] Keyring problems (again) - SOLVED

On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 17:00 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > Problems with Evo and keyrings seem to pop up from time to time. I > haven't had any for quite a while so I guess this was about due. I had Google two-step authentication turned on. Once I visited the 2FA page on Goog

Re: [Evolution] Keyring problems (again) - SOLVED

On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 01:13 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 23:56:04 + > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > till the next time > > To version lock the evolution package and a few dependencies might put > off the evil day. This is what I did for Arc

Re: [Evolution] [SOLVED] Evo freezes during rendering of very large messages

On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 17:36 +, Emilio Recio wrote: > I don't believe this is solved. I had an issue with this as well. I > cannot even read large text messages (10mb)... Have you tried opening > the email in a normal window? The suggestion was to close the preview pane as a workaround to avo

Re: [Evolution] IMAP Namespace in 3.10.4

On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 08:16 -0600, Sajan Parikh wrote: > I just moved over to Fedora 20 from Ubuntu and haven't used Evolution > all too much in the past. > > I need to set an IMAP Path or namespace on my IMAP account. A quick > Google shows tons of refereneces to an option titled to the effect o

Re: [Evolution] IMAP Namespace in 3.10.4

On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 11:09 -0600, Sajan Parikh wrote: > On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 16:56 +0000, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > I don't recall ever seeing that in Evolution. The namespace is normally > > defined at the server end. Why do you want to override it? > > &g

Re: [Evolution] IMAP Namespace in 3.10.4

On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 21:47 +0100, Ángel González wrote: > > My Sent, Junk, Trash folders are all being shown as a subfolder of > > Inbox. In Thunderbird, I was able to set a IMAP Path prefix to > INBOX > > and everything became a top level folder as expected. > > The server should be returning t

Re: [Evolution] Disable Password For NSS User Private Key and Certificate Store

On Thu, 2014-11-20 at 08:07 -0600, Sajan Parikh wrote: > I use S/MIME certificates to encrypt and sign email, but there seems to > be a password prompt the first time the keys and certs are used in each > session of Evolution. > > Is there a way for me to disable this security feature and keep the

Re: [Evolution] Saving Preference Changes

On Sat, 2014-11-22 at 16:29 -0600, Kim Foltz wrote: > I am using Evolution 3.12.7 in Opensuse 13.2. The Evolution Preferences > Panel will display but checking a box anywhere in the panel will not > stay set. The same problem exists in the Plugin Manager panel. There > isn't an apply button on any

Re: [Evolution] [most likely solved] Filter incoming messages by recipients

On Mon, 2014-11-24 at 12:06 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Mon, 2014-11-24 at 11:58 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-11-24 at 10:31 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > > > > > is there a way, that a filter rule can take care about the header's > > > > "X-Apparently-To"? Filtering recipien

Re: [Evolution] Opening links in Firefox

On Sun, 2014-11-30 at 17:44 -0600, Chris wrote: > On Sun, 2014-11-30 at 23:26 +0100, Ángel González wrote: > > On Chris wrote: > > > No joy on that one. Still wants to open Firefox in my Evo window and it > > > brings up my homepage and not the link clicked on. > > > > Join me to the list of peopl

Re: [Evolution] exchange online account not showing in evolution

On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 22:21 +0100, Maurizio Vivarelli wrote: > ubuntu gnome 1410 You need to give the version of Evolution, not the Linux distro. See Help->About. poc ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options

Re: [Evolution] birthday in evolution-calender

On Sun, 2014-12-07 at 21:12 +0100, Bernhard wrote: > What should I do? You should remember to give the version of Evolution you're asking about (see Help->About). poc ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options

Re: [Evolution] evolution 3.2.3

On Mon, 2014-12-15 at 18:52 -0500, Theodore R Sloper wrote: > Ooops! I meant to download version 3.10.4. SORRY A few points: * You don't say what Linux distro you have. 3.10.4 is the Evolution version used on Fedora 20. Other distros have different versions. * It's much easier to use the latest

Re: [Evolution] A UI anomaly

On Tue, 2014-12-16 at 20:50 +, Guy Stalnaker wrote: > P.S. > > Just for funzies, here's something the UI team should know about. > > If I click on the "[Search] in [Current Folder]" dropdown menu to scope > the Search, and leave it dropped down (that is, it remains active), and > then click o

Re: [Evolution] Evolution fails loading Office365 calendar

On Tue, 2014-12-16 at 20:42 +, Guy Stalnaker wrote: > What can I do to help you trouble-shoot this? For one thing, report it to Bugzilla. Post the bug number here for good measure, but BZ is the way to communicate with the developers and keep track of bugs. poc __

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 113, Issue 17

On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 18:03 +, Guy Stalnaker wrote: > Thanks gentlemen. Bug is submitted. GDB shows an SEGFPE with the default > daily view which occurs so quickly I cannot change to another view. Please don't reply to digests. You can reply to a specific message within the digest and maintai

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 113, Issue 17

On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 18:03 +, Guy Stalnaker wrote: > Thanks gentlemen. Bug is submitted. GDB shows an SEGFPE with the default > daily view which occurs so quickly I cannot change to another view. Also, you didn't give the bug number. poc ___ evol

Re: [Evolution] Executing evolution logs the user out

On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 20:06 +0200, Alexis Alexopoulos wrote: > I am running Debian stable with xfce. Telling us it's Debian is just so much noise for the majority of list members who don't use that system. Same would happen if it was Ubuntu or Fedora or Mint or ... The basic information needed

Re: [Evolution] Executing evolution logs the user out

On Fri, 2014-12-19 at 07:14 +, Tom Davies wrote: > Hi :) > Hmm, i wonder why the Evolution Community keeps shrinking! Do you have evidence for that (in comparison with other MUAs)? > Not long ago someone did give their version number only to be scolded > for not saying which distro! Not by m

Re: [Evolution] Executing evolution logs the user out

On Fri, 2014-12-19 at 15:39 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > Which guys are you referring to? You seem to be under the > > misapprehension that those of us who try to answer questions here are > > all developers. Let me assure that the great majority of us aren't. > > We're mere users like you. Sometim

Re: [Evolution] Executing evolution logs the user out

On Fri, 2014-12-19 at 15:26 +, Tom Davies wrote: > That it wasn't you scolding the new person last time is not the point. It is the point if I'm being accused of something I'm not responsible for. If you had cited a specific instance of someone being scolded rather than simply asked for inform

Re: [Evolution] Error while Unknown background operation.

On Fri, 2014-12-19 at 16:40 +, Guy Stalnaker wrote: > "Cannot get message with message ID 48286: No such message available." > > This error has occurred every day I have used Evolution. I cannot remove it > except by restarting Evolution. Seems to be in some sort of loop. The "Cancel > the c

Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 113, Issue 20

On Fri, 2014-12-19 at 17:53 +, Guy Stalnaker wrote: > The error that prompted my email to the list occurred in Evolution > during the time I walked to the Union to grab a cup of coffee and I > was not checking my mail with wither HTC or Samsung device, but I can > figure the only way a message

Re: [Evolution] Executing evolution logs the user out

On Sun, 2014-12-21 at 10:32 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > If you have the list config set to not send duplicates, then when you > are sent a direct copy of the mail, you never receive the list copy, > so have no idea that it hadn't been seen by everyone. You do see the CC header though. > I was goin

Re: [Evolution] UTF-8: Non-ASCII in subject: –

On Sun, 2014-12-21 at 12:55 +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: > Dear Evolution folks, > > > with Debian Sid/unstable and Evolution 3.12.9~git20141130.241663-1 using > the sign – in the subject line, it is incorrectly shown in the message > list, but correctly shown in the message view. Let’s see if you c

Re: [Evolution] Executing evolution logs the user out

On Sun, 2014-12-21 at 15:23 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > On Sun, 2014-12-21 at 11:30 +0000, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Sun, 2014-12-21 at 10:32 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > If you have the list config set to not send duplicates, then when you > > > are sen

Re: [Evolution] Learning/understanding Evolution

On Mon, 2014-12-22 at 01:55 +, Deslich, Jeffery J (IS) wrote: > I'm a Systems Engineer that recently took on the role of system > administration for a medium sized data center. I've no previous experience > with Evolution. Does anyone have suggestions on reference/learning materials > or cla

Re: [Evolution] Deleted messages not really deleted

On Mon, 2014-12-22 at 16:08 -0600, Chris wrote: > Now to make sense of my subject. If I deleted the messages in my 'Spam' > folder they are moved to 'Trash' however, they are still in > ~/Maildir/.Spam/cur. I've noticed this when I moved some false positives > from the spam folder to my Inbox and r

Re: [Evolution] Deleted messages not really deleted

On Mon, 2014-12-22 at 19:55 -0600, Chris wrote: > On Tue, 2014-12-23 at 00:21 +0000, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-12-22 at 16:08 -0600, Chris wrote: > > > Now to make sense of my subject. If I deleted the messages in my 'Spam' > > > folder t

Re: [Evolution] Pleas add MATE ..

On Wed, 2014-12-24 at 13:28 +, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > On Wed, 2014-12-24 at 14:17 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-12-24 at 11:13 +, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > .. in /etc/xdg/autostart/evolution-alarm-notify.desktop: > > > OnlyShowIn=GNOME;Unity;XFCE;Dawati; > > > should

Re: [Evolution] Exchange support for Evolution

On Sun, 2014-12-28 at 12:37 +0100, Harvey Nimmo wrote: > > On Sun, 2014-12-28 at 00:00 -0700, Anbu S wrote: > > Hi > > I'm having difficulties with getting the exchange support MAPI added to > > my version of Evolution 3.13. It gives me a package dependency error > > when i try to install using Ub

Re: [Evolution] Exchange support for Evolution

On Sun, 2014-12-28 at 12:24 -0700, anb...@me.com wrote: > How do I do that? I'm new to Ubuntu - so I eed help Ask on a Ubuntu list. The Evolution list is not platform-specific. poc ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your

Re: [Evolution] [EWS] Losing messages in Evolution with Android phone also configured

On Fri, 2015-01-02 at 21:26 -0800, Colin Kincaid Williams wrote: > For another email account, I have a Samsung phone and setup my mail > configuration with an app similar to below: > > http://www.samsung.com/us/support/supportOwnersHowToGuidePopup.do?howto_guide_seq=7046&prd_ia_cd=N003&map_seq

Re: [Evolution] Evolution not starting

On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 21:50 +0530, SanthanaKrishnan wrote: > Dear All, > > We use evolution mail in our small office of 20 staff. In one system > evolution would not start and I re installed. > > Now it says "evolution: symbol lookup error: evolution: undefined > symbol: ical_set_unknown_token_h

Re: [Evolution] Evolution not starting (SanthanaKrishnan)

On Sat, 2015-01-10 at 14:01 +, Tom, Yahoo wrote: > It would be MUCH better to simply upgrade to Fedora 20 or to their > "Rawhide" (which will probably become 21 eventually). As Pete says, Fedora 21 is already released. However I would absolutely NOT recommend anyone other than an expert intere

Re: [Evolution] Evolution not starting (SanthanaKrishnan)

On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 15:50 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > RHEL is not an exact match though to a Fedora version - there are > things > in RHEL that were never in Fedora (mainly commercial enterprise > things) > - and similarly, CentOS isn't an exact match to RHEL either in that > some > things retain

Re: [Evolution] Evolution not starting (SanthanaKrishnan)

On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 12:59 +0530, SanthanaKrishnan wrote: > Dear All, > > Thanks for the detailed reply to my query. I am really surprised the way > the open source community work and the passion everyone show towards it. > > Lot of members from the group had helped by giving their advice. Our >

Re: [Evolution] Evolution not starting (SanthanaKrishnan)

On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 13:38 +, Tom Davies wrote: > Hi :) [Please don't top-post on the list] > I think it can be upgraded but to do that you would probably need to > download Evo from the official website. Evo is in synch with the version of Gnome, so updating to a radically different versio

Re: [Evolution] Endless "Empty cache file" errors

On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 22:47 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > If you still can't find out what's causing it, then try running Evo > from the command line with some debugging variables turned on - I > thought there was one specifically to debug filters, but I can't find > it at the moment. It's actually a

Re: [Evolution] Automatically downloading all e-mails from IMAP server

On Tue, 2015-01-20 at 12:36 +0100, Francesco Turco wrote: > I have Evolution 3.12.10. I'd like to automatically download all e-mails > from my IMAP server every time I run Evolution, but the Send/Receive > button doesn't do that. It just downloads new e-mails, not old ones. I > need this for backup

Re: [Evolution] Automatically downloading all e-mails from IMAP server

On Tue, 2015-01-20 at 13:01 +0100, Francesco Turco wrote: > On Tue, 2015-01-20 at 11:52 +0000, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-01-20 at 12:36 +0100, Francesco Turco wrote: > > > I have Evolution 3.12.10. I'd like to automatically download all e-mails >

Re: [Evolution] Automatically downloading all e-mails from IMAP server

On Tue, 2015-01-20 at 18:52 +0100, Francesco Turco wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015, at 17:35, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > Do you regularly access the same account from some other client? I'm > > trying to understand why some emails are not new but have not previ

Re: [Evolution] Automatically downloading all e-mails from IMAP server

On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 14:14 -0700, Bart wrote: > On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 11:40 +0100, Karsten Kloss wrote: > > Sorry, but is POP3 not available? Change to POP3 and you have your > > backup. > > > > regards > > Karsten > > > > Oh oh! You said the "P" word! :) > > The next 14 messages will be ab

Re: [Evolution] Messages vanish from Junk folder (apparently) when it is opened

On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 17:23 -0800, Andre Klapper wrote: > So messages **marked as deleted** vanish from the junk folder. > > That's expected behavior as Evolution purges folders that include > messages marked as deleted when switching/updating folders. Not necessarily. That's a configuration opti

Re: [Evolution] Messages vanish from Junk folder (apparently) when it is opened

On Sun, 2015-01-25 at 13:52 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Sun, 2015-01-25 at 12:45 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > On Sat, 2015-01-24 at 16:10 -0500, Dennis Reichel wrote: > > > It seems that the Junk folder is not virtual because the the messages > > > reside in the Junk folder, not their original

Re: [Evolution] EWS Timezone error?

On Fri, 2015-01-30 at 13:27 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > Please say which version of Evolution and Evolution-EWS you are using. > (But I see from the headers it's 3.13.10 - what is this recent desire > for people to run development versions of Evo??) Actually that just gives the version used to post

Re: [Evolution] Evolution password troubles

On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 12:06 +0100, rabre hispeed wrote: > Hi there, > > with Evolution 3.12.9 and 8 new Debian / KDE do I have to Evolution > 3.12.9 > Start typing the password to utilize the Evolution 3.12.9. > > However, I had to start again today after X a password for the > Enter e-mail addr

Re: [Evolution] Evolution password troubles

On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 13:42 +0100, rabre hispeed wrote: > ok just now I installed the seahorse/seahorse-deamon > I prefer KDE But what means SDDM? [Please don't top-post as it annoys a lot of people] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_Desktop_Display_Manager poc ___

Re: [Evolution] Evolution] Caja "send to" option doesn't open a new message

On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 18:34 -0300, Néstor wrote: > Setting: linux mint 17.1 MATE with Caja file manager and Evolution > 3.10.4 as the default email client > When right clicking on a file and choosing the send to option Evolution > doesn't open a new message window. > It seems that Evolution is "rea

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >