Re: [Evolution] What do I do now? V2

2022-11-02 Thread Greg Oliver via evolution-list
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 10:33 AM Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > > On Wed, 2022-11-02 at 20:23 +0800, Bret Busby wrote: > > It is clear that the vast majority simply do not want a mailing list. > > Hi, > well, I believe that's a wrong assumption. You might also consider that > if "ra

Re: [Evolution] Have I pushed Evolution beyond where it is designed to go?

2022-11-08 Thread Greg Oliver via evolution-list
On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 9:58 AM Paul Smith wrote: > > On Tue, 2022-11-08 at 09:33 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > I know this is getting way of topic, but this is primarily why I shy > > away from Flatpak. You download a blob of "stuff" and you have no > > real idea what is in that - it could be some

[Evolution] evolution -i (import)

2019-04-16 Thread Greg Oliver via evolution-list
Hi, i have a bunch of files I need to import one by one (too many to chug through the 4 clicks in the GUI each time), so I found the import option, but there is no way for me to get the rest of the command line options (if they exist) for the command. When I invode it from a shell for each file, i

[Evolution] Reversed To: recipients displayed

2019-11-07 Thread Greg Oliver via evolution-list
Just wandering if this is something I can change somehow. evolution-3.34.1-1.fc31.x86_64 evolution-ews-3.34.1-1.fc31.x86_64 evolution-data-server-langpacks-3.34.1-1.fc31.noarch evolution-data-server-3.34.1-1.fc31.x86_64 evolution-langpacks-3.34.1-1.fc31.noarch evolution-ews-langpacks-3.34.1-1.fc31

Re: [Evolution] Reversed To: recipients displayed

2019-11-07 Thread Greg Oliver via evolution-list
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 1:43 PM Greg Oliver wrote: > Just wandering if this is something I can change somehow. > > evolution-3.34.1-1.fc31.x86_64 > evolution-ews-3.34.1-1.fc31.x86_64 > evolution-data-server-langpacks-3.34.1-1.fc31.noarch > evolution-data-server-3.34.1-1.fc31.x86_64 > evolution-lan

[Evolution] Folders Unavailable During Searches

2020-03-05 Thread Greg Oliver via evolution-list
Hi, Using: evolution-langpacks-3.34.4-1.fc31.noarch evolution-ews-3.34.4-1.fc31.x86_64 evolution-ews-langpacks-3.34.4-1.fc31.noarch evolution-data-server-langpacks-3.34.4-1.fc31.noarch evolution-3.34.4-1.fc31.x86_64 evolution-data-server-3.34.4-1.fc31.x86_64 connected to Office 365, when perform

Re: [Evolution] Folders Unavailable During Searches

2020-03-06 Thread Greg Oliver via evolution-list
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 12:19 AM Milan Crha via evolution-list < evolution-list@gnome.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 21:58 -0600, Greg Oliver via evolution-list > wrote: > > when performing a search with these versions, I can no longer moves > > messages to folders

[Evolution] Message Search without AT-SPI

2020-09-17 Thread Greg Oliver via evolution-list
Hi, When searching "message body" in evolution, it tries to invoke AT-SPI (with Fedora anyhow). I disable AT-SPI completely, so the results never come : Sep 17 15:50:17 localhost.localdomain dbus-broker-launch[1247]: Activation request for 'org.a11y.atspi.Registry' failed. Sep 17 15:50:17 localh

[Evolution] XFS being remounted at Evo Startup

2021-01-15 Thread Greg Oliver via evolution-list
Hi, Running Fedora 33 (this just started with an update) Kernel 5.9.16-200.fc33.x86_64 evolution-data-server-langpacks-3.38.2-1.fc33.noarch evolution-data-server-3.38.2-1.fc33.x86_64 evolution-langpacks-3.38.2-1.fc33.noarch evolution-3.38.2-1.fc33.x86_64 evolution-ews-langpacks-3.38.2-1.fc33.noar

Re: [Evolution] XFS being remounted at Evo Startup

2021-01-15 Thread Greg Oliver via evolution-list
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 3:26 PM Andre Klapper via evolution-list < evolution-list@gnome.org> wrote: > On Fri, 2021-01-15 at 15:17 -0600, Greg Oliver wrote: > > Jan 15 15:13:41 carbon kernel: xfs filesystem being remounted at > > /newroot/home/greg/.local/share/webkitgtk/databases supports > > time

Re: [Evolution] XFS being remounted at Evo Startup

2021-01-16 Thread Greg Oliver via evolution-list
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 6:15 PM Ángel wrote: > On 2021-01-15 at 15:33 -0600, Greg Oliver wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 3:26 PM Andre Klapper wrote: > > > On Fri, 2021-01-15 at 15:17 -0600, Greg Oliver wrote: > > > > Any ideas why this is happening all of the sudden? > > > > > > What does thi

Re: [Evolution] XFS being remounted at Evo Startup

2021-01-17 Thread Greg Oliver via evolution-list
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 10:36 AM Pete Biggs wrote: > On Sat, 2021-01-16 at 14:30 -0700, Zan Lynx wrote: > > On 1/16/21 1:07 PM, Ángel wrote: > > > This shows an ext4 on /, and a xfs filesystem on /home > > > > > > > > > However, your dmesg messages: > > > > > > > [ 1357.401728] xfs filesystem bei

Re: [Evolution] XFS being remounted at Evo Startup

2021-01-17 Thread Greg Oliver via evolution-list
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 4:51 PM Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > I of course read all of those same google posts as well before I > > posted here. I still do not see why starting evolution causes it. > > It is definitively Evolution startup that makes it happen. > > > > > > [ 579.985355] xfs filesyste

Re: [Evolution] XFS being remounted at Evo Startup

2021-01-18 Thread Greg Oliver via evolution-list
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 4:29 AM Milan Crha via evolution-list < evolution-list@gnome.org> wrote: > On Sun, 2021-01-17 at 19:39 -0600, Greg Oliver via evolution-list > wrote: > > They converted their evolution package to flatpak once I downloaded > > their sou

Re: [Evolution] XFS being remounted at Evo Startup

2021-01-18 Thread Greg Oliver via evolution-list
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 5:35 AM Sorin Srbu via evolution-list < evolution-list@gnome.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2021-01-18 at 04:43 -0600, Greg Oliver via evolution-list wrote: > > I still have the long standing issue of Webkit not utilizing SMP and it > taking several seconds to ren

Re: [Evolution] Help me understand something please

2022-06-29 Thread Greg Oliver via evolution-list
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 12:43 PM Jaroslaw Rafa wrote: > Dnia 29.06.2022 o godz. 12:30:10 Tim McConnell via evolution-list pisze: > > Unlikely but true, I copied one of the cron reports into an email and > > attached the original one sent and sent it to myself in gmail. > > My CPU stayed under 35%

Re: [Evolution] High disk usage

2022-10-10 Thread Greg Oliver via evolution-list
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 5:46 AM Pelle Windestam via evolution-list < evolution-list@gnome.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2022-10-10 at 11:36 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > > On Mon, 2022-10-10 at 10:55 +0200, Pelle Windestam via evolution-list > > wrote: > > > when I by accident looked at my

Re: [Evolution] Announcement: this mailing list will be retired by the end of Oct 2022

2022-10-20 Thread Greg Oliver via evolution-list
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 3:45 PM Andrea Veri wrote: > And it seems I forgot both [1] and [2], there you go. > > [1] > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2022-August/msg4.html > [2] > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2022-September/msg00018.html > I have to ag

Re: [Evolution] Announcement: this mailing list will be retired by the end of Oct 2022

2022-10-20 Thread Greg Oliver via evolution-list
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 3:58 PM Andrea Veri wrote: > Greg, > > nobody is requiring you to use a web forum, the only time where you need > to use it is the first time where you'd be configuring the tag you want to > watch, in this case the evolution one. Once that has happened you'll get > all the

Re: [Evolution] Discourse -- Insufficient Trust Level

2022-10-21 Thread Greg Oliver via evolution-list
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 11:35 AM Steve Litt wrote: > Pete Biggs said on Fri, 21 Oct 2022 13:42:57 +0100 > > > >Yup. You're a new user so not trusted to do things. See > > > >https://blog.discourse.org/2018/06/understanding-discourse-trust-levels/ > > > >It doesn't take much to get to Level 1 - I'

Re: [Evolution] Oh for heavens sake ....

2022-10-21 Thread Greg Oliver via evolution-list
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 1:31 PM Andrea Veri wrote: > Pete, > > Emmanuele is looking into it, thanks for all your efforts here! With any > change it comes some pain, when we initially moved from cgit to GitLab a > lot of people complained on with more features comes additional complexity, > when w