On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 4:29 AM Milan Crha via evolution-list < evolution-list@gnome.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-01-17 at 19:39 -0600, Greg Oliver via evolution-list > wrote: > > They converted their evolution package to flatpak once I downloaded > > their source and looked inside it. > > Hi, > apparently they did not. Fedora offers both Flatpak and RPM Evolution. > You can choose which you install. (Kind of) Sadly, GNOME Software > prefers the Flatpak version over the RPM version (which causes > confusion to the users). You did not install the Evolution through > GNOME Software though, because you do not have it installed, thus I > miss how you could get the Flatpak version of it. Maybe due to using > Silverblue? You know. > > One thing, maybe I'm wrong, but WebKitGTK 2.30.x defaults to use its > own sandbox, which has some limitations (one of the most common is an > inability to print from the Evolution). The sandbox use can be disabled > with: > > $ WEBKIT_FORCE_SANDBOX=0 evolution > bingo! I was in fact webkit. I mistakenly assumed it was flatpak when I saw the flatpak files in the RPM from fedora for evolution. Man I hate Webkit more and more every day. I am eventually going to have to stop using evolution because of it :( I still have the long standing issue of Webkit not utilizing SMP and it taking several seconds to render a reply window on very large HTML email replies. It has been years, but I still cannot get used to having to wait to start typing a reply with CPU usage sitting @ 100% on a single core until it finishes, but that's a separate topic. Thanks again Milan - > As it runs bubble wrap in the background, which is used in Flatpak too, > it can be related. Just a guess from my side, though. > > Bye, > Milan > >
_______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
