Hi,
My mail server did some nasty things the other night, and I was forced to
rebuild without a backup to restore. Most users were ok since they had cached
copies of their emails, and could copy them to local folders, and the re-create
the server in their client and copy them to the server's f
- Original Message -
> From: "Milan Crha"
> To: "evolution-list"
> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 6:18:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [Evolution] IMAP server dead, but evolution has my emails
> On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 17:39 -0500, Greg Oliver wrote:
>>
&g
Hi, I am using (Fedora versions)
evolution-data-server-3.20.5-3.fc24.x86_64
evolution-ews-3.20.5-1.fc24.x86_64
evolution-3.20.5-1.fc24.x86_64
Something I have never encountered with evolution throughout the past 10+
years of using it is happening to me. When replying to an email, Evolution
is pu
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 3:13 AM, Pete Biggs wrote:
>
> > Something I have never encountered with evolution throughout the past
> > 10+ years of using it is happening to me. When replying to an email,
> > Evolution is putting the previous email reply (same thread email)
> > into the composing win
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Greg Oliver wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 3:13 AM, Pete Biggs wrote:
>
>>
>> > Something I have never encountered with evolution throughout the past
>> > 10+ years of using it is happening to me. When replying to an email,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 2:10 AM, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 12:04 -0500, Greg Oliver wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Greg Oliver
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Next email in thread, I hit reply all - Evolution is adding the
> > > rep
In the latest version I have:
evolution-3.22.1-2.fc25.x86_64
evolution-3.22.6-2.fc25.x86_64
evolution-data-server-3.22.1-1.fc25.x86_64
evolution-data-server-3.22.7-2.fc25.x86_64
evolution-ews-3.22.1-1.fc25.x86_64
evolution-ews-3.22.6-1.fc25.x86_64
evolution-help-3.22.1-2.fc25.noarch
evolution-help
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-08-11 at 17:04 -0500, Greg Oliver wrote:
> > In the latest version I have:
> >
> > evolution-3.22.1-2.fc25.x86_64
> > evolution-3.22.6-2.fc25.x86_64
> > evolution-data-server-3.22.1-1
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 6:02 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-08-11 at 17:22 -0500, Greg Oliver wrote:
> > webkitgtk4-2.16.3-1.fc25.x86_64
> >
> > [...]
>
> > webkitgtk-2.4.11-3.fc25.x86_64
>
> Two versions of Webkitgtk4?
>
>
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-08-11 at 17:04 -0500, Greg Oliver wrote:
> > Hitting reply to emails that are html formatted takes several seconds
> > (up to 30 on long emails!!!) before I can reply.
>
> Hi,
> is evolution fro
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Michael Hirmke
wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> since evolution-ews-3.26.3 handling of recurring appointments got even
> worse.
>
> Before, I had problems when modifying a single appointment in a series
> from evolution calendar gui. This lead to a duplicate entry:
> https://bu
Evolution 2.4.2.1
DS - the same
JESCS - 2.4.3
I started on Evo 2.2, then upgraded in hopes of this working.
The connector options show up in the new account type, etc, but when I
start Evolution, I never get the button for it like the FAQ states.
Anyone successfully using this? I get no mention
I just upgraded to 2.6.2 and gnome 2.14.2 - and a really annoying
feature was introduced.
Each time I create a new message, there is now a formatting toolbar
between the subject line and the message pane. I can tab twice to get
past it, but cannot shift-tab to get back above it to the subject lin
Evolution 2.4.2.1
DS - the same
JESCS - 2.4.3
I started on Evo 2.2, then upgraded in hopes of this working.
The connector options show up in the new account type, etc, but when I
start Evolution, I never get the button for it like the FAQ states.
Anyone successfully using this? I get no mention
hether it can work. Then start evolution to have a try.
>
> Harry
>
> On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 12:42 -0600, Greg Oliver wrote:
> > Evolution 2.4.2.1
> > DS - the same
> > JESCS - 2.4.3
> >
> > I started on Evo 2.2, then upgraded in hopes of this
escs. You can star it in a command
> line to see whether it can work. Then start evolution to have a try.
>
> Harry
>
> On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 12:42 -0600, Greg Oliver wrote:
> > Evolution 2.4.2.1
> > DS - the same
> > JESCS - 2.4.3
> >
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 10:33 AM Milan Crha via evolution-list
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2022-11-02 at 20:23 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> > It is clear that the vast majority simply do not want a mailing list.
>
> Hi,
> well, I believe that's a wrong assumption. You might also consider that
> if "ra
On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 9:58 AM Paul Smith wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2022-11-08 at 09:33 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > I know this is getting way of topic, but this is primarily why I shy
> > away from Flatpak. You download a blob of "stuff" and you have no
> > real idea what is in that - it could be some
Hi, i have a bunch of files I need to import one by one (too many to chug
through the 4 clicks in the GUI each time), so I found the import option,
but there is no way for me to get the rest of the command line options (if
they exist) for the command.
When I invode it from a shell for each file, i
Just wandering if this is something I can change somehow.
evolution-3.34.1-1.fc31.x86_64
evolution-ews-3.34.1-1.fc31.x86_64
evolution-data-server-langpacks-3.34.1-1.fc31.noarch
evolution-data-server-3.34.1-1.fc31.x86_64
evolution-langpacks-3.34.1-1.fc31.noarch
evolution-ews-langpacks-3.34.1-1.fc31
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 1:43 PM Greg Oliver wrote:
> Just wandering if this is something I can change somehow.
>
> evolution-3.34.1-1.fc31.x86_64
> evolution-ews-3.34.1-1.fc31.x86_64
> evolution-data-server-langpacks-3.34.1-1.fc31.noarch
> evolution-data-server-3.34.1-1.fc31.
Hi,
Using:
evolution-langpacks-3.34.4-1.fc31.noarch
evolution-ews-3.34.4-1.fc31.x86_64
evolution-ews-langpacks-3.34.4-1.fc31.noarch
evolution-data-server-langpacks-3.34.4-1.fc31.noarch
evolution-3.34.4-1.fc31.x86_64
evolution-data-server-3.34.4-1.fc31.x86_64
connected to Office 365, when perform
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 12:19 AM Milan Crha via evolution-list <
evolution-list@gnome.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 21:58 -0600, Greg Oliver via evolution-list
> wrote:
> > when performing a search with these versions, I can no longer moves
> > messages to folders
Hi,
When searching "message body" in evolution, it tries to invoke AT-SPI (with
Fedora anyhow). I disable AT-SPI completely, so the results never come :
Sep 17 15:50:17 localhost.localdomain dbus-broker-launch[1247]: Activation
request for 'org.a11y.atspi.Registry' failed.
Sep 17 15:50:17 localh
Hi,
Running Fedora 33 (this just started with an update)
Kernel 5.9.16-200.fc33.x86_64
evolution-data-server-langpacks-3.38.2-1.fc33.noarch
evolution-data-server-3.38.2-1.fc33.x86_64
evolution-langpacks-3.38.2-1.fc33.noarch
evolution-3.38.2-1.fc33.x86_64
evolution-ews-langpacks-3.38.2-1.fc33.noar
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 3:26 PM Andre Klapper via evolution-list <
evolution-list@gnome.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-01-15 at 15:17 -0600, Greg Oliver wrote:
> > Jan 15 15:13:41 carbon kernel: xfs filesystem being remounted at
> > /newroot/home/greg/.local/share/webkitg
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 6:15 PM Ángel wrote:
> On 2021-01-15 at 15:33 -0600, Greg Oliver wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 3:26 PM Andre Klapper wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2021-01-15 at 15:17 -0600, Greg Oliver wrote:
> > > > Any ideas why this is happening all of the
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 10:36 AM Pete Biggs wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-01-16 at 14:30 -0700, Zan Lynx wrote:
> > On 1/16/21 1:07 PM, Ángel wrote:
> > > This shows an ext4 on /, and a xfs filesystem on /home
> > >
> > >
> > > However, your dmesg messages:
> > >
> > > > [ 1357.401728] xfs filesystem bei
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 4:51 PM Pete Biggs wrote:
> >
> > I of course read all of those same google posts as well before I
> > posted here. I still do not see why starting evolution causes it.
> > It is definitively Evolution startup that makes it happen.
> >
> >
> > [ 579.985355] xfs filesyste
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 4:29 AM Milan Crha via evolution-list <
evolution-list@gnome.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-01-17 at 19:39 -0600, Greg Oliver via evolution-list
> wrote:
> > They converted their evolution package to flatpak once I downloaded
> > their sou
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 5:35 AM Sorin Srbu via evolution-list <
evolution-list@gnome.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-01-18 at 04:43 -0600, Greg Oliver via evolution-list wrote:
> > I still have the long standing issue of Webkit not utilizing SMP and it
> taking several seconds to ren
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 12:43 PM Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> Dnia 29.06.2022 o godz. 12:30:10 Tim McConnell via evolution-list pisze:
> > Unlikely but true, I copied one of the cron reports into an email and
> > attached the original one sent and sent it to myself in gmail.
> > My CPU stayed under 35%
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 5:46 AM Pelle Windestam via evolution-list <
evolution-list@gnome.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-10-10 at 11:36 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> > On Mon, 2022-10-10 at 10:55 +0200, Pelle Windestam via evolution-list
> > wrote:
> > > when I by accident looked at my
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 3:45 PM Andrea Veri wrote:
> And it seems I forgot both [1] and [2], there you go.
>
> [1]
> https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2022-August/msg4.html
> [2]
> https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2022-September/msg00018.html
>
I have to ag
think I
would just ditch it all. Just let me know.
> Thanks,
>
> [1]
> https://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2022-October/msg00144.html
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 10:51 PM Greg Oliver
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 3:45 PM Andrea Veri w
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 11:35 AM Steve Litt
wrote:
> Pete Biggs said on Fri, 21 Oct 2022 13:42:57 +0100
>
>
> >Yup. You're a new user so not trusted to do things. See
> >
> >https://blog.discourse.org/2018/06/understanding-discourse-trust-levels/
> >
> >It doesn't take much to get to Level 1 - I'
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 1:31 PM Andrea Veri wrote:
> Pete,
>
> Emmanuele is looking into it, thanks for all your efforts here! With any
> change it comes some pain, when we initially moved from cgit to GitLab a
> lot of people complained on with more features comes additional complexity,
> when w
37 matches
Mail list logo
